收入差距、不公平厌恶与医疗保健制度设计

J. Leach
{"title":"收入差距、不公平厌恶与医疗保健制度设计","authors":"J. Leach","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9442.2009.01564.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An ex post social welfare function is used to evaluate alternative healthcare systems. If a society is averse to inequality and there is some income disparity, social welfare under private healthcare insurance is sometimes higher and sometimes lower than social welfare under public healthcare. However, a third system - public healthcare with the option to purchase supplemental healthcare insurance - is always socially preferred to private healthcare insurance. Moreover, it is either socially preferred to public healthcare or equivalent to it.","PeriodicalId":316250,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income Disparity, Inequity Aversion and the Design of the Healthcare System\",\"authors\":\"J. Leach\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1467-9442.2009.01564.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An ex post social welfare function is used to evaluate alternative healthcare systems. If a society is averse to inequality and there is some income disparity, social welfare under private healthcare insurance is sometimes higher and sometimes lower than social welfare under public healthcare. However, a third system - public healthcare with the option to purchase supplemental healthcare insurance - is always socially preferred to private healthcare insurance. Moreover, it is either socially preferred to public healthcare or equivalent to it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":316250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2009.01564.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Social Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2009.01564.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

事后社会福利函数用于评估替代性医疗保健系统。如果一个社会反对不平等,并且存在一定的收入差距,那么私人医疗保险下的社会福利有时高于公共医疗保险下的社会福利,有时低于公共医疗保险下的社会福利。然而,第三种制度——可以选择购买补充医疗保险的公共医疗——总是比私人医疗保险更受社会青睐。此外,它要么在社会上比公共医疗保健更受欢迎,要么与公共医疗保健相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Income Disparity, Inequity Aversion and the Design of the Healthcare System
An ex post social welfare function is used to evaluate alternative healthcare systems. If a society is averse to inequality and there is some income disparity, social welfare under private healthcare insurance is sometimes higher and sometimes lower than social welfare under public healthcare. However, a third system - public healthcare with the option to purchase supplemental healthcare insurance - is always socially preferred to private healthcare insurance. Moreover, it is either socially preferred to public healthcare or equivalent to it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信