面向对象软件中用于确定缺陷类的机器学习算法的评估

Prabhpahul Singh, R. Malhotra
{"title":"面向对象软件中用于确定缺陷类的机器学习算法的评估","authors":"Prabhpahul Singh, R. Malhotra","doi":"10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software defect prediction is a well renowned field of software engineering. Determination of defective classes early in the lifecycle of a software product helps software practitioners in effective allocation of resources. More resources are allocated to probable defective classes so that defects can be removed in the initial phases of the software product. Such a practice would lead to a good quality software product. Although, hundreds of defect prediction models have been developed and validated by researchers, there is still a need to develop and evaluate more models to draw generalized conclusions. Literature studies have found Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to be effective classifiers in this domain. Thus, this study evaluates four ML algorithms on data collected from seven open source software projects for developing software defect prediction models. The results indicate superior performance of the Multilayer Perceptron algorithm over all the other investigated algorithms. The results of the study are also statistically evaluated to establish their effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":357118,"journal":{"name":"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of machine learning algorithms for determining defective classes in an object-oriented software\",\"authors\":\"Prabhpahul Singh, R. Malhotra\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software defect prediction is a well renowned field of software engineering. Determination of defective classes early in the lifecycle of a software product helps software practitioners in effective allocation of resources. More resources are allocated to probable defective classes so that defects can be removed in the initial phases of the software product. Such a practice would lead to a good quality software product. Although, hundreds of defect prediction models have been developed and validated by researchers, there is still a need to develop and evaluate more models to draw generalized conclusions. Literature studies have found Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to be effective classifiers in this domain. Thus, this study evaluates four ML algorithms on data collected from seven open source software projects for developing software defect prediction models. The results indicate superior performance of the Multilayer Perceptron algorithm over all the other investigated algorithms. The results of the study are also statistically evaluated to establish their effectiveness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 6th International Conference on Reliability, Infocom Technologies and Optimization (Trends and Future Directions) (ICRITO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRITO.2017.8342425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

软件缺陷预测是软件工程中一个非常著名的领域。在软件产品生命周期的早期确定有缺陷的类有助于软件从业者有效地分配资源。将更多的资源分配给可能有缺陷的类,以便在软件产品的初始阶段消除缺陷。这样的实践将产生高质量的软件产品。尽管研究人员已经开发和验证了数百个缺陷预测模型,但是仍然需要开发和评估更多的模型来得出一般化的结论。文献研究发现,机器学习(ML)算法是该领域有效的分类器。因此,本研究评估了从七个开源软件项目收集的数据上的四种ML算法,用于开发软件缺陷预测模型。结果表明,多层感知器算法的性能优于所有其他研究算法。对研究结果进行了统计评估,以确定其有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of machine learning algorithms for determining defective classes in an object-oriented software
Software defect prediction is a well renowned field of software engineering. Determination of defective classes early in the lifecycle of a software product helps software practitioners in effective allocation of resources. More resources are allocated to probable defective classes so that defects can be removed in the initial phases of the software product. Such a practice would lead to a good quality software product. Although, hundreds of defect prediction models have been developed and validated by researchers, there is still a need to develop and evaluate more models to draw generalized conclusions. Literature studies have found Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to be effective classifiers in this domain. Thus, this study evaluates four ML algorithms on data collected from seven open source software projects for developing software defect prediction models. The results indicate superior performance of the Multilayer Perceptron algorithm over all the other investigated algorithms. The results of the study are also statistically evaluated to establish their effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信