离开印度教:反宗教化为解放

Michael Stausberg
{"title":"离开印度教:反宗教化为解放","authors":"Michael Stausberg","doi":"10.1163/9789004331471_009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Leaving one religion, and in its place committing to another one, tends to appear as two sides of one coin, or as two steps in one process. Conversion narratives typically emphasise dissatisfaction with and imperfections of the former and the superiority of the new religion respectively. Another model of conversion is the adoption of a religious self-assertion by previously religiously uncommitted persons who discover religion and a religion; or, alternatively, the dissolution of a religious identification and the adoption of a non-religious one;. for example, former religious believers now profess new identities as humanists or atheists. Leaving religion, however, is not the same as leaving a religion. In this chapter, we will consider the case of a public person who decided to leave Hinduism, the religion he was thrown into by birth in colonial Western India. The decision to leave this religion, however, did not emerge in the process of converting to another religion, nor did he leave religion altogether – in fact, he did not profess to be nonor anti-religious but he found religion useful and necessary. Apparently, he was not tempted to create a religion of his own making. Instead he proceeded to adopt some already extant religion, but this protracted or retarded quest for the religion he would adopt went on over several decades. The religion he and several hundred thousand of his followers adopted eventually, Buddhism, was being remade in the process. The person is question was Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar (1891–1956), often hailed as the ‘father of the Indian constitution’.","PeriodicalId":364665,"journal":{"name":"Handbook of Leaving Religion","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Leaving Hinduism: Deconversion as Liberation\",\"authors\":\"Michael Stausberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004331471_009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Leaving one religion, and in its place committing to another one, tends to appear as two sides of one coin, or as two steps in one process. Conversion narratives typically emphasise dissatisfaction with and imperfections of the former and the superiority of the new religion respectively. Another model of conversion is the adoption of a religious self-assertion by previously religiously uncommitted persons who discover religion and a religion; or, alternatively, the dissolution of a religious identification and the adoption of a non-religious one;. for example, former religious believers now profess new identities as humanists or atheists. Leaving religion, however, is not the same as leaving a religion. In this chapter, we will consider the case of a public person who decided to leave Hinduism, the religion he was thrown into by birth in colonial Western India. The decision to leave this religion, however, did not emerge in the process of converting to another religion, nor did he leave religion altogether – in fact, he did not profess to be nonor anti-religious but he found religion useful and necessary. Apparently, he was not tempted to create a religion of his own making. Instead he proceeded to adopt some already extant religion, but this protracted or retarded quest for the religion he would adopt went on over several decades. The religion he and several hundred thousand of his followers adopted eventually, Buddhism, was being remade in the process. The person is question was Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar (1891–1956), often hailed as the ‘father of the Indian constitution’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":364665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handbook of Leaving Religion\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handbook of Leaving Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004331471_009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook of Leaving Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004331471_009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

离开一种宗教,转而信仰另一种宗教,似乎是一枚硬币的两面,或者是一个过程中的两个步骤。皈依叙事通常分别强调对旧宗教的不满和不完善,以及新宗教的优越性。另一种皈依模式是,以前不信教的人在发现宗教和一种宗教后,采用一种宗教自我主张;或者解除宗教身份,采用非宗教身份;例如,以前的宗教信徒现在宣称新的身份是人文主义者或无神论者。然而,离开宗教并不等于离开宗教。在本章中,我们将考虑一个公众人物决定离开印度教的案例,他出生在殖民地西印度。然而,离开这个宗教的决定并不是在皈依另一个宗教的过程中出现的,他也没有完全离开宗教——事实上,他并没有声称自己是非宗教或反宗教的,但他发现宗教是有用的和必要的。显然,他并不想创造一个自己创造的宗教。相反,他开始接受一些已经存在的宗教,但这种对他将要接受的宗教的漫长或迟滞的追求持续了几十年。在这个过程中,他和数十万追随者最终信奉的宗教——佛教——正在被重塑。这个人是Bhimrao Ambedkar博士(1891-1956),经常被誉为“印度宪法之父”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Leaving Hinduism: Deconversion as Liberation
Leaving one religion, and in its place committing to another one, tends to appear as two sides of one coin, or as two steps in one process. Conversion narratives typically emphasise dissatisfaction with and imperfections of the former and the superiority of the new religion respectively. Another model of conversion is the adoption of a religious self-assertion by previously religiously uncommitted persons who discover religion and a religion; or, alternatively, the dissolution of a religious identification and the adoption of a non-religious one;. for example, former religious believers now profess new identities as humanists or atheists. Leaving religion, however, is not the same as leaving a religion. In this chapter, we will consider the case of a public person who decided to leave Hinduism, the religion he was thrown into by birth in colonial Western India. The decision to leave this religion, however, did not emerge in the process of converting to another religion, nor did he leave religion altogether – in fact, he did not profess to be nonor anti-religious but he found religion useful and necessary. Apparently, he was not tempted to create a religion of his own making. Instead he proceeded to adopt some already extant religion, but this protracted or retarded quest for the religion he would adopt went on over several decades. The religion he and several hundred thousand of his followers adopted eventually, Buddhism, was being remade in the process. The person is question was Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar (1891–1956), often hailed as the ‘father of the Indian constitution’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信