没有按照NFPA 70E进行电压“活-死-活”测试是否足够?

George T. Cole
{"title":"没有按照NFPA 70E进行电压“活-死-活”测试是否足够?","authors":"George T. Cole","doi":"10.1109/ESW49992.2023.10188329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the second to last step for an electrically safe work condition (ESWC) to exist, testing for the absence of voltage, commonly called “Live-Dead-Live” testing, is one of the most critical tools to ensure the safety of workers from electric shock and arc flash hazards. It has been required by NFPA 70E® - Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace [1] since the 2004 edition, with slight changes between revisions. The 2021 version houses this very important practice in article 120.5(7) which states in part “Use an adequately rated portable test instrument to test each phase conductor or circuit part to test for the absence of voltage. Test each phase conductor or circuit part both phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground.” However, the term “phase-to-phase” is synonymous with only alternate current (ac) systems and “phase-to-ground” with only intentionally grounded ac systems. Contrary to this, ungrounded distribution systems and now with the proliferation of direct current (dc) circuits, especially with the electric vehicle charging stations, solar power plants and dc distribution systems, the terms “phase-to-phase” and “phase-to-ground” doesn't appear to be adequate or applicable in today's ever-changing world of electrical technology. Secondly is the frequency to reperform absence of voltage testing once the initial has been performed per 120.4(6) seems inadequate as currently stipulated. This paper will provide a basis that article 120 should be updated for greater technical accuracy and clarity which will provide greater safety margin for workers who are exposed to additional electrical hazards found in today's modern equipment.","PeriodicalId":167800,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Absence of Voltage “Live-Dead-Live” Testing According to NFPA 70E Adequate?\",\"authors\":\"George T. Cole\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ESW49992.2023.10188329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the second to last step for an electrically safe work condition (ESWC) to exist, testing for the absence of voltage, commonly called “Live-Dead-Live” testing, is one of the most critical tools to ensure the safety of workers from electric shock and arc flash hazards. It has been required by NFPA 70E® - Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace [1] since the 2004 edition, with slight changes between revisions. The 2021 version houses this very important practice in article 120.5(7) which states in part “Use an adequately rated portable test instrument to test each phase conductor or circuit part to test for the absence of voltage. Test each phase conductor or circuit part both phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground.” However, the term “phase-to-phase” is synonymous with only alternate current (ac) systems and “phase-to-ground” with only intentionally grounded ac systems. Contrary to this, ungrounded distribution systems and now with the proliferation of direct current (dc) circuits, especially with the electric vehicle charging stations, solar power plants and dc distribution systems, the terms “phase-to-phase” and “phase-to-ground” doesn't appear to be adequate or applicable in today's ever-changing world of electrical technology. Secondly is the frequency to reperform absence of voltage testing once the initial has been performed per 120.4(6) seems inadequate as currently stipulated. This paper will provide a basis that article 120 should be updated for greater technical accuracy and clarity which will provide greater safety margin for workers who are exposed to additional electrical hazards found in today's modern equipment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":167800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESW49992.2023.10188329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ESW49992.2023.10188329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为电气安全工作条件(ESWC)存在的倒数第二步,无电压测试通常被称为“活-死-活”测试,是确保工人免受电击和电弧闪光危害的最关键工具之一。自2004年版本以来,它已被NFPA 70E®-工作场所电气安全标准[1]所要求,各版本之间略有变化。2021年版本在第120.5(7)条中包含了这一非常重要的实践,其中部分规定“使用适当额定的便携式测试仪器测试每个相位导体或电路部分以测试是否存在电压。”测试每个相导体或电路部分的相对相和相对地。然而,术语“相对相”仅与交流(ac)系统同义,而“相对地”仅与有意接地的交流系统同义。与此相反,不接地的配电系统和现在直流(dc)电路的扩散,特别是电动汽车充电站,太阳能发电厂和直流配电系统,术语“相对相”和“相对地”似乎不足够或适用于今天不断变化的电气技术世界。其次,一旦根据120.4(6)进行了初始测试,重新进行没有电压测试的频率似乎不符合目前的规定。本文将为第120条更新提供基础,以提高技术准确性和清晰度,这将为暴露于当今现代设备中发现的额外电气危险的工人提供更大的安全余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is Absence of Voltage “Live-Dead-Live” Testing According to NFPA 70E Adequate?
As the second to last step for an electrically safe work condition (ESWC) to exist, testing for the absence of voltage, commonly called “Live-Dead-Live” testing, is one of the most critical tools to ensure the safety of workers from electric shock and arc flash hazards. It has been required by NFPA 70E® - Standard for Electrical Safety in the Workplace [1] since the 2004 edition, with slight changes between revisions. The 2021 version houses this very important practice in article 120.5(7) which states in part “Use an adequately rated portable test instrument to test each phase conductor or circuit part to test for the absence of voltage. Test each phase conductor or circuit part both phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground.” However, the term “phase-to-phase” is synonymous with only alternate current (ac) systems and “phase-to-ground” with only intentionally grounded ac systems. Contrary to this, ungrounded distribution systems and now with the proliferation of direct current (dc) circuits, especially with the electric vehicle charging stations, solar power plants and dc distribution systems, the terms “phase-to-phase” and “phase-to-ground” doesn't appear to be adequate or applicable in today's ever-changing world of electrical technology. Secondly is the frequency to reperform absence of voltage testing once the initial has been performed per 120.4(6) seems inadequate as currently stipulated. This paper will provide a basis that article 120 should be updated for greater technical accuracy and clarity which will provide greater safety margin for workers who are exposed to additional electrical hazards found in today's modern equipment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信