理科生与非理科生学习偏好与学习挑战的比较

Ai-Hong Chen, Muhammad Syahiran Samsudin
{"title":"理科生与非理科生学习偏好与学习挑战的比较","authors":"Ai-Hong Chen, Muhammad Syahiran Samsudin","doi":"10.24191/smrj.v19i1.17249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the need for rethinking the education system designed centuries ago, it is essential to understand the current challenges of the university learning environment. We aimed to compare the learning preferences and learning challenges between science and non-science university students. 109 individuals participated in the online survey. The dependent, collaborative and independent learning preferences were inspected. The internal and external factors of learning challenges were examined jointly with social support systems, motivation, and coping styles. Both groups displayed comparable learning preferences (p>0.05) except for social media. Eight out of 17 learning challenges were significantly different between science and non-science students (p<0.05). Both groups reported analogous support systems (p>0.05) except for housemates. Similar intrinsic and extrinsic motivations were unveiled (p>0.01). Dissimilar mature and neurotic coping styles were revealed (p<0.05). In conclusion, learning preferences between science and non-science students are relatively similar, but the learning challenges vary.","PeriodicalId":352592,"journal":{"name":"Social &amp; Management Research Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Learning Preference and Learning Challenges Between Science and Non-Science University Students\",\"authors\":\"Ai-Hong Chen, Muhammad Syahiran Samsudin\",\"doi\":\"10.24191/smrj.v19i1.17249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the need for rethinking the education system designed centuries ago, it is essential to understand the current challenges of the university learning environment. We aimed to compare the learning preferences and learning challenges between science and non-science university students. 109 individuals participated in the online survey. The dependent, collaborative and independent learning preferences were inspected. The internal and external factors of learning challenges were examined jointly with social support systems, motivation, and coping styles. Both groups displayed comparable learning preferences (p>0.05) except for social media. Eight out of 17 learning challenges were significantly different between science and non-science students (p<0.05). Both groups reported analogous support systems (p>0.05) except for housemates. Similar intrinsic and extrinsic motivations were unveiled (p>0.01). Dissimilar mature and neurotic coping styles were revealed (p<0.05). In conclusion, learning preferences between science and non-science students are relatively similar, but the learning challenges vary.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social &amp; Management Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social &amp; Management Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v19i1.17249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social &amp; Management Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/smrj.v19i1.17249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于需要重新思考几个世纪前设计的教育体系,了解当前大学学习环境的挑战是至关重要的。本研究旨在比较理科生和非理科生的学习偏好和学习挑战。109人参与了在线调查。考察了依赖型、合作型和独立型学习偏好。学习挑战的内部和外部因素与社会支持系统、动机和应对方式共同研究。除社交媒体外,两组均表现出可比性学习偏好(p>0.05)。除室友外,理科生和非理科生在17项学习挑战中有8项存在显著差异(p0.05)。内在动机和外在动机相似(p < 0.01)。成熟应对方式与神经质应对方式差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。综上所述,理科学生和非理科学生的学习偏好相对相似,但学习挑战有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Learning Preference and Learning Challenges Between Science and Non-Science University Students
Due to the need for rethinking the education system designed centuries ago, it is essential to understand the current challenges of the university learning environment. We aimed to compare the learning preferences and learning challenges between science and non-science university students. 109 individuals participated in the online survey. The dependent, collaborative and independent learning preferences were inspected. The internal and external factors of learning challenges were examined jointly with social support systems, motivation, and coping styles. Both groups displayed comparable learning preferences (p>0.05) except for social media. Eight out of 17 learning challenges were significantly different between science and non-science students (p<0.05). Both groups reported analogous support systems (p>0.05) except for housemates. Similar intrinsic and extrinsic motivations were unveiled (p>0.01). Dissimilar mature and neurotic coping styles were revealed (p<0.05). In conclusion, learning preferences between science and non-science students are relatively similar, but the learning challenges vary.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信