预防涉及个人的海关法律纠纷

201906 Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.14451/2.132.26
Кожемякин Дмитрий Владимирович
{"title":"预防涉及个人的海关法律纠纷","authors":"Кожемякин Дмитрий Владимирович","doi":"10.14451/2.132.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to analyze the existing judicial practice concerning the jurisdiction domain disputes in its compliance with applicable laws and the doctrine. Today the vast majority of domain name disputes are considered by arbitration courts, which often proceed them in violation of the existing jurisdiction criteria and law. The current law-enforcement practice actually established the special jurisdiction of domain disputes to arbitration courts, although the current legislation does not allow its proper justification. The author suggests that the current situation reveals an objective necessity of establishing such jurisdiction, and the only reasonable way to remove the contradictions between the law and the existing \"custom\" is the introduction of relevant amendments to the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":409344,"journal":{"name":"201906","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Профилактика таможенно-правовых споров с участием физических лиц\",\"authors\":\"Кожемякин Дмитрий Владимирович\",\"doi\":\"10.14451/2.132.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this article is to analyze the existing judicial practice concerning the jurisdiction domain disputes in its compliance with applicable laws and the doctrine. Today the vast majority of domain name disputes are considered by arbitration courts, which often proceed them in violation of the existing jurisdiction criteria and law. The current law-enforcement practice actually established the special jurisdiction of domain disputes to arbitration courts, although the current legislation does not allow its proper justification. The author suggests that the current situation reveals an objective necessity of establishing such jurisdiction, and the only reasonable way to remove the contradictions between the law and the existing \\\"custom\\\" is the introduction of relevant amendments to the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":409344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"201906\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"201906\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14451/2.132.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"201906","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14451/2.132.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是分析我国现行司法实践中关于管辖权领域争议的适用法律和原则。今天,绝大多数域名争议都是由仲裁法院审理的,而仲裁法院的处理往往违反了现有的管辖权标准和法律。目前的执法实践实际上确立了领域争议对仲裁法院的特殊管辖权,尽管目前的立法不允许其适当的正当性。作者认为,目前的形势揭示了建立这种管辖权的客观必要性,消除法律与现有“习惯”之间矛盾的唯一合理途径是对俄罗斯联邦仲裁程序法典进行相关修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Профилактика таможенно-правовых споров с участием физических лиц
The purpose of this article is to analyze the existing judicial practice concerning the jurisdiction domain disputes in its compliance with applicable laws and the doctrine. Today the vast majority of domain name disputes are considered by arbitration courts, which often proceed them in violation of the existing jurisdiction criteria and law. The current law-enforcement practice actually established the special jurisdiction of domain disputes to arbitration courts, although the current legislation does not allow its proper justification. The author suggests that the current situation reveals an objective necessity of establishing such jurisdiction, and the only reasonable way to remove the contradictions between the law and the existing "custom" is the introduction of relevant amendments to the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信