Y. Odeyemi, M. Pollind, Ryan Peeler, K. Nozawa, D. Vesely, Anthony M. Page, C. Rakovski, H. El-Askary
{"title":"1993 ~ 2017年气候研究与资助综述:一种多项式Logistic回归方法","authors":"Y. Odeyemi, M. Pollind, Ryan Peeler, K. Nozawa, D. Vesely, Anthony M. Page, C. Rakovski, H. El-Askary","doi":"10.3808/JEIL.201900011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research builds a multinomial regression framework to conduct a meta-analysis of trends in climate research and funding as related to the state of affairs in the last twenty-five years in this area of research. We used a climate research query-based strategy searching the Web of Science, National Science Foundation, Australia Department of Environment and Energy, African Development Bank’s African Climate Change Fund, the Asian Development Bank Climate Change Fund and Australia’s Department of Environment and Energy databases to perform quantitative and qualitative trend analysis. Data were harvested using a web scraper and filtered for the 1993 ~ 2017 window. Comparative analysis was carried out to evaluate the climate research output per continent. Also, we evaluated the role funding plays in the climate research outcomes. Different text processing and mining techniques were used to extract information and data needed for trend analysis and statistical modeling. The text processing revealed trends such as major key- words, key opinion leaders, and individual country’s contribution, monthly and yearly spread of published articles in the climate research domain. From these trends, we engineered some of the variables to build a multinomial regression model to further understand future trends in the climate research space. It is probabilistic in nature with the assumption of no inter correlation between variables, hence outputs are more significant. We found that funding for climate research has been on a steady increase in the last twenty-five years, with the US and European investing hundreds of millions of dollars in alternative and renewable energy. Lastly, the multinomial logistic regression assesses the impact of number of investigators, abstract word count and institution types on the class of grant awarded by NSF. This research builds a multinomial regression framework to conduct a meta-analysis of trends in climate research and funding as related to the state of affairs in the last twenty-five years in this area of research. We used a climate research query-based strategy searching the Web of Science, National Science Foundation, Australia Department of Environment and Energy, African Development Bank’s African Climate Change Fund, the Asian Development Bank Climate Change Fund and Australia’s Department of Environment and Energy databases to perform quantitative and qualitative trend analysis. Data were harvested using a web scraper and filtered for the 1993 ~ 2017 window. Comparative analysis was carried out to evaluate the climate research output per continent. Also, we evaluated the role funding plays in the climate research outcomes. Different text processing and mining techniques were used to extract information and data needed for trend analysis and statistical modeling. The text processing revealed trends such as major keywords, key opinion leaders, and individual country’s contribution, monthly and yearly spread of published articles in the climate research domain. From these trends, we engineered some of the variables to build a multinomial regression model to further understand future trends in the climate research space. It is probabilistic in nature with the assumption of no inter correlation between variables, hence outputs are more significant. We found that funding for climate research has been on a steady increase in the last twenty-five years, with the US and European investing hundreds of millions of dollars in alternative and renewable energy. Lastly, the multinomial logistic regression assesses the impact of number of investigators, abstract word count and institution types on the class of grant awarded by NSF.","PeriodicalId":143718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Climate Research and Funding 1993 ~ 2017: A Multinomial Logistic Regression Approach\",\"authors\":\"Y. Odeyemi, M. Pollind, Ryan Peeler, K. Nozawa, D. Vesely, Anthony M. Page, C. Rakovski, H. El-Askary\",\"doi\":\"10.3808/JEIL.201900011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research builds a multinomial regression framework to conduct a meta-analysis of trends in climate research and funding as related to the state of affairs in the last twenty-five years in this area of research. We used a climate research query-based strategy searching the Web of Science, National Science Foundation, Australia Department of Environment and Energy, African Development Bank’s African Climate Change Fund, the Asian Development Bank Climate Change Fund and Australia’s Department of Environment and Energy databases to perform quantitative and qualitative trend analysis. Data were harvested using a web scraper and filtered for the 1993 ~ 2017 window. Comparative analysis was carried out to evaluate the climate research output per continent. Also, we evaluated the role funding plays in the climate research outcomes. Different text processing and mining techniques were used to extract information and data needed for trend analysis and statistical modeling. The text processing revealed trends such as major key- words, key opinion leaders, and individual country’s contribution, monthly and yearly spread of published articles in the climate research domain. From these trends, we engineered some of the variables to build a multinomial regression model to further understand future trends in the climate research space. It is probabilistic in nature with the assumption of no inter correlation between variables, hence outputs are more significant. We found that funding for climate research has been on a steady increase in the last twenty-five years, with the US and European investing hundreds of millions of dollars in alternative and renewable energy. Lastly, the multinomial logistic regression assesses the impact of number of investigators, abstract word count and institution types on the class of grant awarded by NSF. This research builds a multinomial regression framework to conduct a meta-analysis of trends in climate research and funding as related to the state of affairs in the last twenty-five years in this area of research. We used a climate research query-based strategy searching the Web of Science, National Science Foundation, Australia Department of Environment and Energy, African Development Bank’s African Climate Change Fund, the Asian Development Bank Climate Change Fund and Australia’s Department of Environment and Energy databases to perform quantitative and qualitative trend analysis. Data were harvested using a web scraper and filtered for the 1993 ~ 2017 window. Comparative analysis was carried out to evaluate the climate research output per continent. Also, we evaluated the role funding plays in the climate research outcomes. Different text processing and mining techniques were used to extract information and data needed for trend analysis and statistical modeling. The text processing revealed trends such as major keywords, key opinion leaders, and individual country’s contribution, monthly and yearly spread of published articles in the climate research domain. From these trends, we engineered some of the variables to build a multinomial regression model to further understand future trends in the climate research space. It is probabilistic in nature with the assumption of no inter correlation between variables, hence outputs are more significant. We found that funding for climate research has been on a steady increase in the last twenty-five years, with the US and European investing hundreds of millions of dollars in alternative and renewable energy. Lastly, the multinomial logistic regression assesses the impact of number of investigators, abstract word count and institution types on the class of grant awarded by NSF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3808/JEIL.201900011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3808/JEIL.201900011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究建立了一个多项回归框架,对过去25年气候研究和资金状况的趋势进行了荟萃分析。我们使用基于气候研究查询的策略,检索Web of Science、美国国家科学基金会、澳大利亚环境与能源部、非洲开发银行的非洲气候变化基金、亚洲开发银行气候变化基金和澳大利亚环境与能源部的数据库,进行定量和定性趋势分析。使用web scraper收集数据,并对1993年至2017年的窗口进行过滤。对各大洲的气候研究成果进行了对比分析。此外,我们还评估了资金在气候研究成果中所起的作用。使用不同的文本处理和挖掘技术来提取趋势分析和统计建模所需的信息和数据。文本处理揭示了气候研究领域的主要关键词、主要意见领袖、单个国家的贡献、每月和每年发表的文章的传播等趋势。根据这些趋势,我们设计了一些变量来构建多项式回归模型,以进一步了解气候研究领域的未来趋势。它本质上是概率性的,假设变量之间没有相互关联,因此输出更重要。我们发现,在过去的25年里,气候研究的资金一直在稳步增长,美国和欧洲在替代能源和可再生能源上投入了数亿美元。最后,采用多项逻辑回归方法评估了研究人员数量、摘要字数和机构类型对NSF资助类别的影响。本研究建立了一个多项回归框架,对过去25年气候研究和资金状况的趋势进行了荟萃分析。我们使用基于气候研究查询的策略,检索Web of Science、美国国家科学基金会、澳大利亚环境与能源部、非洲开发银行的非洲气候变化基金、亚洲开发银行气候变化基金和澳大利亚环境与能源部的数据库,进行定量和定性趋势分析。使用web scraper收集数据,并对1993年至2017年的窗口进行过滤。对各大洲的气候研究成果进行了对比分析。此外,我们还评估了资金在气候研究成果中所起的作用。使用不同的文本处理和挖掘技术来提取趋势分析和统计建模所需的信息和数据。文本处理揭示了气候研究领域的主要关键词、主要意见领袖、单个国家的贡献、每月和每年发表的文章的传播等趋势。根据这些趋势,我们设计了一些变量来构建多项式回归模型,以进一步了解气候研究领域的未来趋势。它本质上是概率性的,假设变量之间没有相互关联,因此输出更重要。我们发现,在过去的25年里,气候研究的资金一直在稳步增长,美国和欧洲在替代能源和可再生能源上投入了数亿美元。最后,采用多项逻辑回归方法评估了研究人员数量、摘要字数和机构类型对NSF资助类别的影响。
Review of Climate Research and Funding 1993 ~ 2017: A Multinomial Logistic Regression Approach
This research builds a multinomial regression framework to conduct a meta-analysis of trends in climate research and funding as related to the state of affairs in the last twenty-five years in this area of research. We used a climate research query-based strategy searching the Web of Science, National Science Foundation, Australia Department of Environment and Energy, African Development Bank’s African Climate Change Fund, the Asian Development Bank Climate Change Fund and Australia’s Department of Environment and Energy databases to perform quantitative and qualitative trend analysis. Data were harvested using a web scraper and filtered for the 1993 ~ 2017 window. Comparative analysis was carried out to evaluate the climate research output per continent. Also, we evaluated the role funding plays in the climate research outcomes. Different text processing and mining techniques were used to extract information and data needed for trend analysis and statistical modeling. The text processing revealed trends such as major key- words, key opinion leaders, and individual country’s contribution, monthly and yearly spread of published articles in the climate research domain. From these trends, we engineered some of the variables to build a multinomial regression model to further understand future trends in the climate research space. It is probabilistic in nature with the assumption of no inter correlation between variables, hence outputs are more significant. We found that funding for climate research has been on a steady increase in the last twenty-five years, with the US and European investing hundreds of millions of dollars in alternative and renewable energy. Lastly, the multinomial logistic regression assesses the impact of number of investigators, abstract word count and institution types on the class of grant awarded by NSF. This research builds a multinomial regression framework to conduct a meta-analysis of trends in climate research and funding as related to the state of affairs in the last twenty-five years in this area of research. We used a climate research query-based strategy searching the Web of Science, National Science Foundation, Australia Department of Environment and Energy, African Development Bank’s African Climate Change Fund, the Asian Development Bank Climate Change Fund and Australia’s Department of Environment and Energy databases to perform quantitative and qualitative trend analysis. Data were harvested using a web scraper and filtered for the 1993 ~ 2017 window. Comparative analysis was carried out to evaluate the climate research output per continent. Also, we evaluated the role funding plays in the climate research outcomes. Different text processing and mining techniques were used to extract information and data needed for trend analysis and statistical modeling. The text processing revealed trends such as major keywords, key opinion leaders, and individual country’s contribution, monthly and yearly spread of published articles in the climate research domain. From these trends, we engineered some of the variables to build a multinomial regression model to further understand future trends in the climate research space. It is probabilistic in nature with the assumption of no inter correlation between variables, hence outputs are more significant. We found that funding for climate research has been on a steady increase in the last twenty-five years, with the US and European investing hundreds of millions of dollars in alternative and renewable energy. Lastly, the multinomial logistic regression assesses the impact of number of investigators, abstract word count and institution types on the class of grant awarded by NSF.