基于通用漏洞评分系统(CVSS)的SHA512和MD5算法漏洞测试

Fahmi Basya, M. Hardjanto, Ikbal Permana Putra
{"title":"基于通用漏洞评分系统(CVSS)的SHA512和MD5算法漏洞测试","authors":"Fahmi Basya, M. Hardjanto, Ikbal Permana Putra","doi":"10.36805/bit-cs.v3i1.2046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the comparison of the results of testing the OTP (One Time Password) algorithm on two encryptions, namely SHA512 and MD5 which are applied to the Reconciliation Application of the Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Desa Kabupaten Sukabumi. This study uses the Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT) method, which combines two forms of vulnerability testing to achieve a much more complete vulnerability analysis by performing different tasks in the same focus area. The vulnerability assessment uses the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) method. The results showed that the Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT) method was proven to be able to identify the level of security vulnerability in the Reconciliation Application at the Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Desa Kabupaten Sukabumi with a vulnerability level score of 5.3 in the SHA512 environment with a medium rating and 7.5 in the MD5 environment. with high ratings. So, it can be concluded that the best algorithm for implementing OTP is SHA512","PeriodicalId":389042,"journal":{"name":"Buana Information Technology and Computer Sciences (BIT and CS)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SHA512 and MD5 Algorithm Vulnerability Testing Using Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS)\",\"authors\":\"Fahmi Basya, M. Hardjanto, Ikbal Permana Putra\",\"doi\":\"10.36805/bit-cs.v3i1.2046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the comparison of the results of testing the OTP (One Time Password) algorithm on two encryptions, namely SHA512 and MD5 which are applied to the Reconciliation Application of the Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Desa Kabupaten Sukabumi. This study uses the Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT) method, which combines two forms of vulnerability testing to achieve a much more complete vulnerability analysis by performing different tasks in the same focus area. The vulnerability assessment uses the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) method. The results showed that the Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT) method was proven to be able to identify the level of security vulnerability in the Reconciliation Application at the Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Desa Kabupaten Sukabumi with a vulnerability level score of 5.3 in the SHA512 environment with a medium rating and 7.5 in the MD5 environment. with high ratings. So, it can be concluded that the best algorithm for implementing OTP is SHA512\",\"PeriodicalId\":389042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buana Information Technology and Computer Sciences (BIT and CS)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buana Information Technology and Computer Sciences (BIT and CS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36805/bit-cs.v3i1.2046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buana Information Technology and Computer Sciences (BIT and CS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36805/bit-cs.v3i1.2046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文讨论了OTP (One Time Password)算法在用于Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Desa Kabupaten Sukabumi对账应用的SHA512和MD5两种加密上的测试结果的比较。本研究使用了漏洞评估和渗透测试(VAPT)方法,该方法结合了两种形式的漏洞测试,通过在同一重点领域执行不同的任务来实现更完整的漏洞分析。漏洞评估采用通用漏洞评分系统(Common vulnerability Scoring System, CVSS)方法。结果表明,脆弱性评估和渗透测试(VAPT)方法被证明能够识别出Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Desa Kabupaten Sukabumi的和解应用程序的安全漏洞级别,在SHA512环境下的漏洞级别得分为5.3,评级中等,在MD5环境下的漏洞级别得分为7.5。收视率很高。因此,可以得出实现OTP的最佳算法是SHA512
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SHA512 and MD5 Algorithm Vulnerability Testing Using Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS)
This paper discusses the comparison of the results of testing the OTP (One Time Password) algorithm on two encryptions, namely SHA512 and MD5 which are applied to the Reconciliation Application of the Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Desa Kabupaten Sukabumi. This study uses the Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT) method, which combines two forms of vulnerability testing to achieve a much more complete vulnerability analysis by performing different tasks in the same focus area. The vulnerability assessment uses the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) method. The results showed that the Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing (VAPT) method was proven to be able to identify the level of security vulnerability in the Reconciliation Application at the Dinas Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dan Desa Kabupaten Sukabumi with a vulnerability level score of 5.3 in the SHA512 environment with a medium rating and 7.5 in the MD5 environment. with high ratings. So, it can be concluded that the best algorithm for implementing OTP is SHA512
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信