{"title":"Microsoft Academic、Google Scholar和ScienceDirect作为搜索引擎在学生获取图书馆资源中的比较","authors":"B. Wiyono, A. Valdez, J. Yunus","doi":"10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Obtaining library resources is the main task that carried out by students in attending lectures. The student learning experience will be achieved maximally if it is supported by complete library resources. The existence of strong development of information and communication technology makes everyone tend to seek information through the internet. For that reason, search engines are an easy way to get sufficient library resources. Many types of search engines are available, but which ones are effective and efficient are not studied in depth. Hence, it is necessary to research to find an effective search engine. In this study, three types of engines were taken from that were mostly used by the students, namely Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. A total of 134 doctoral program students were taken as research samples. The results showed that students used Google Scholar more in finding library sources, followed by ScienceDirect, and Microsoft Academic. There are differences in the advantages, disadvantages, and availability of information obtained through the three search engines.","PeriodicalId":187876,"journal":{"name":"2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparison of the Use of Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect as Search Engines in Obtaining Library Resources for Students\",\"authors\":\"B. Wiyono, A. Valdez, J. Yunus\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Obtaining library resources is the main task that carried out by students in attending lectures. The student learning experience will be achieved maximally if it is supported by complete library resources. The existence of strong development of information and communication technology makes everyone tend to seek information through the internet. For that reason, search engines are an easy way to get sufficient library resources. Many types of search engines are available, but which ones are effective and efficient are not studied in depth. Hence, it is necessary to research to find an effective search engine. In this study, three types of engines were taken from that were mostly used by the students, namely Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. A total of 134 doctoral program students were taken as research samples. The results showed that students used Google Scholar more in finding library sources, followed by ScienceDirect, and Microsoft Academic. There are differences in the advantages, disadvantages, and availability of information obtained through the three search engines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":187876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 7th International Conference on Education and Technology (ICET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICET53279.2021.9575087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
获取图书馆资源是学生听课的主要任务。如果有完整的图书馆资源支持,学生的学习体验将得到最大限度的实现。信息通信技术迅猛发展的存在使得每个人都倾向于通过互联网来寻找信息。因此,搜索引擎是获取充足图书馆资源的一种简单方法。搜索引擎的类型很多,但哪些是有效的和高效的并没有深入研究。因此,有必要研究找到一个有效的搜索引擎。在本研究中,我们选取了学生使用最多的三种搜索引擎,分别是Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar和ScienceDirect。以134名博士生为研究样本。结果显示,学生们更多地使用Google Scholar来查找图书馆资源,其次是ScienceDirect和Microsoft Academic。通过这三种搜索引擎获得的信息在优点、缺点和可用性方面存在差异。
The Comparison of the Use of Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect as Search Engines in Obtaining Library Resources for Students
Obtaining library resources is the main task that carried out by students in attending lectures. The student learning experience will be achieved maximally if it is supported by complete library resources. The existence of strong development of information and communication technology makes everyone tend to seek information through the internet. For that reason, search engines are an easy way to get sufficient library resources. Many types of search engines are available, but which ones are effective and efficient are not studied in depth. Hence, it is necessary to research to find an effective search engine. In this study, three types of engines were taken from that were mostly used by the students, namely Microsoft Academic, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect. A total of 134 doctoral program students were taken as research samples. The results showed that students used Google Scholar more in finding library sources, followed by ScienceDirect, and Microsoft Academic. There are differences in the advantages, disadvantages, and availability of information obtained through the three search engines.