价值映射和建模SoS保证技术和供应链

Jeannine M. Siviy, Christopher J. Alberts, A. Moore, Carol Woody, Julia H. Allen
{"title":"价值映射和建模SoS保证技术和供应链","authors":"Jeannine M. Siviy, Christopher J. Alberts, A. Moore, Carol Woody, Julia H. Allen","doi":"10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A significant challenge for systems of systems assurance is that the return on investment from the adoption of assurance technologies and solutions — both technically and financially — is typically not realized by the organizations that directly make the investment. Consequently, decisions to adopt these technologies are difficult to justify, if not impossible. In turn, this devalues the return on investment of those who have funded the research and development of assurance-oriented technologies. In a recently launched project on software assurance, with specific focus on Systems of Systems (SoS) assurance, the SEI has begun characterizing and modeling interrelationships among organizations across the supply chain and the assurance technologies they fund, create and transition to multiple types of “consumers.” Taxonomies and an initial systems dynamics model describing organizations' roles in the “assurance supply chain” and technologies' assurance contribution have been developed. These can support investment and adoption decisions, even when the adopting organization and/or assurance technology is several degrees removed from the final system.","PeriodicalId":131616,"journal":{"name":"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value mapping and modeling SoS assurance technologies and supply chain\",\"authors\":\"Jeannine M. Siviy, Christopher J. Alberts, A. Moore, Carol Woody, Julia H. Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A significant challenge for systems of systems assurance is that the return on investment from the adoption of assurance technologies and solutions — both technically and financially — is typically not realized by the organizations that directly make the investment. Consequently, decisions to adopt these technologies are difficult to justify, if not impossible. In turn, this devalues the return on investment of those who have funded the research and development of assurance-oriented technologies. In a recently launched project on software assurance, with specific focus on Systems of Systems (SoS) assurance, the SEI has begun characterizing and modeling interrelationships among organizations across the supply chain and the assurance technologies they fund, create and transition to multiple types of “consumers.” Taxonomies and an initial systems dynamics model describing organizations' roles in the “assurance supply chain” and technologies' assurance contribution have been developed. These can support investment and adoption decisions, even when the adopting organization and/or assurance technology is several degrees removed from the final system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

系统保证系统面临的一个重大挑战是,采用保证技术和解决方案的投资回报——技术上和财务上——通常没有由直接进行投资的组织实现。因此,采用这些技术的决定即使不是不可能,也很难证明是合理的。反过来,这降低了那些为面向保证的技术的研究和开发提供资金的人的投资回报。在最近启动的一个关于软件保证的项目中,特别关注于系统的系统(SoS)保证,SEI已经开始描述和建模跨供应链的组织之间的相互关系,以及他们资助、创建和过渡到多种类型的“消费者”的保证技术。分类法和初始系统动力学模型描述了组织在“保证供应链”中的角色以及技术对保证的贡献。这些可以支持投资和采用决策,即使采用组织和/或保证技术在一定程度上与最终系统分离。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Value mapping and modeling SoS assurance technologies and supply chain
A significant challenge for systems of systems assurance is that the return on investment from the adoption of assurance technologies and solutions — both technically and financially — is typically not realized by the organizations that directly make the investment. Consequently, decisions to adopt these technologies are difficult to justify, if not impossible. In turn, this devalues the return on investment of those who have funded the research and development of assurance-oriented technologies. In a recently launched project on software assurance, with specific focus on Systems of Systems (SoS) assurance, the SEI has begun characterizing and modeling interrelationships among organizations across the supply chain and the assurance technologies they fund, create and transition to multiple types of “consumers.” Taxonomies and an initial systems dynamics model describing organizations' roles in the “assurance supply chain” and technologies' assurance contribution have been developed. These can support investment and adoption decisions, even when the adopting organization and/or assurance technology is several degrees removed from the final system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信