Jeannine M. Siviy, Christopher J. Alberts, A. Moore, Carol Woody, Julia H. Allen
{"title":"价值映射和建模SoS保证技术和供应链","authors":"Jeannine M. Siviy, Christopher J. Alberts, A. Moore, Carol Woody, Julia H. Allen","doi":"10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A significant challenge for systems of systems assurance is that the return on investment from the adoption of assurance technologies and solutions — both technically and financially — is typically not realized by the organizations that directly make the investment. Consequently, decisions to adopt these technologies are difficult to justify, if not impossible. In turn, this devalues the return on investment of those who have funded the research and development of assurance-oriented technologies. In a recently launched project on software assurance, with specific focus on Systems of Systems (SoS) assurance, the SEI has begun characterizing and modeling interrelationships among organizations across the supply chain and the assurance technologies they fund, create and transition to multiple types of “consumers.” Taxonomies and an initial systems dynamics model describing organizations' roles in the “assurance supply chain” and technologies' assurance contribution have been developed. These can support investment and adoption decisions, even when the adopting organization and/or assurance technology is several degrees removed from the final system.","PeriodicalId":131616,"journal":{"name":"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value mapping and modeling SoS assurance technologies and supply chain\",\"authors\":\"Jeannine M. Siviy, Christopher J. Alberts, A. Moore, Carol Woody, Julia H. Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A significant challenge for systems of systems assurance is that the return on investment from the adoption of assurance technologies and solutions — both technically and financially — is typically not realized by the organizations that directly make the investment. Consequently, decisions to adopt these technologies are difficult to justify, if not impossible. In turn, this devalues the return on investment of those who have funded the research and development of assurance-oriented technologies. In a recently launched project on software assurance, with specific focus on Systems of Systems (SoS) assurance, the SEI has begun characterizing and modeling interrelationships among organizations across the supply chain and the assurance technologies they fund, create and transition to multiple types of “consumers.” Taxonomies and an initial systems dynamics model describing organizations' roles in the “assurance supply chain” and technologies' assurance contribution have been developed. These can support investment and adoption decisions, even when the adopting organization and/or assurance technology is several degrees removed from the final system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2009.4815804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Value mapping and modeling SoS assurance technologies and supply chain
A significant challenge for systems of systems assurance is that the return on investment from the adoption of assurance technologies and solutions — both technically and financially — is typically not realized by the organizations that directly make the investment. Consequently, decisions to adopt these technologies are difficult to justify, if not impossible. In turn, this devalues the return on investment of those who have funded the research and development of assurance-oriented technologies. In a recently launched project on software assurance, with specific focus on Systems of Systems (SoS) assurance, the SEI has begun characterizing and modeling interrelationships among organizations across the supply chain and the assurance technologies they fund, create and transition to multiple types of “consumers.” Taxonomies and an initial systems dynamics model describing organizations' roles in the “assurance supply chain” and technologies' assurance contribution have been developed. These can support investment and adoption decisions, even when the adopting organization and/or assurance technology is several degrees removed from the final system.