lambda(讨论)(关于X3J13的报告))(目的)

R. Mathis
{"title":"lambda(讨论)(关于X3J13的报告))(目的)","authors":"R. Mathis","doi":"10.1145/1317193.1317201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"X3Ji3, the technical committee for the standardization of Common Lisp, is moving ahead in a number of areas. At the meeting in Palo Alto (March 1618, 1987) there was a long presentation and discussion on the object system proposal. The object system proposal has evolved from a number of different proposals all of which had individual names and all of which had their strong proponents. Some of the initial discussions seemed to be centered around what we would call it and thereby which group would get more credit for proposing it. The committee working on this proposal has made a lot of progress and developed an approach that draws many of the best ideas together. This approach now seems to be so much a part of the way people are thinking about the language that what to call it no longer seems to be a topic for discussion. I think this is a very positive sign about the mutual support for this proposal.","PeriodicalId":262740,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGPLAN Lisp Pointers","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"((lambda (discussions) (report on X3J13)) (purposes))\",\"authors\":\"R. Mathis\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1317193.1317201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"X3Ji3, the technical committee for the standardization of Common Lisp, is moving ahead in a number of areas. At the meeting in Palo Alto (March 1618, 1987) there was a long presentation and discussion on the object system proposal. The object system proposal has evolved from a number of different proposals all of which had individual names and all of which had their strong proponents. Some of the initial discussions seemed to be centered around what we would call it and thereby which group would get more credit for proposing it. The committee working on this proposal has made a lot of progress and developed an approach that draws many of the best ideas together. This approach now seems to be so much a part of the way people are thinking about the language that what to call it no longer seems to be a topic for discussion. I think this is a very positive sign about the mutual support for this proposal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":262740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGPLAN Lisp Pointers\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGPLAN Lisp Pointers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1317193.1317201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGPLAN Lisp Pointers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1317193.1317201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

X3Ji3, Common Lisp标准化技术委员会,正在许多领域取得进展。在帕洛阿尔托(1618年3月,1987年)的会议上,有一个很长的介绍和讨论的对象系统的建议。对象系统提案是从许多不同的提案演变而来的,所有这些提案都有各自的名字,并且都有强有力的支持者。一些最初的讨论似乎围绕着我们该如何称呼它,以及哪个小组会因为提出它而获得更多的信任。负责这项提案的委员会已经取得了很大进展,并制定了一种将许多最好的想法结合在一起的方法。这种方法现在似乎是人们思考语言的方式的一部分,以至于如何称呼它似乎不再是一个讨论的话题。我认为这是一个非常积极的信号,表明大家都支持这个提议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
((lambda (discussions) (report on X3J13)) (purposes))
X3Ji3, the technical committee for the standardization of Common Lisp, is moving ahead in a number of areas. At the meeting in Palo Alto (March 1618, 1987) there was a long presentation and discussion on the object system proposal. The object system proposal has evolved from a number of different proposals all of which had individual names and all of which had their strong proponents. Some of the initial discussions seemed to be centered around what we would call it and thereby which group would get more credit for proposing it. The committee working on this proposal has made a lot of progress and developed an approach that draws many of the best ideas together. This approach now seems to be so much a part of the way people are thinking about the language that what to call it no longer seems to be a topic for discussion. I think this is a very positive sign about the mutual support for this proposal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信