从名古屋到里约再返回,途经布鲁塞尔。欧盟传统知识和遗传资源的保护

F. Papadopoulou
{"title":"从名古屋到里约再返回,途经布鲁塞尔。欧盟传统知识和遗传资源的保护","authors":"F. Papadopoulou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2924569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most important contribution for the international regulation and protection of traditional knowledge and genetic resources (TKGR) was made in Rio in 1992 by means of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The objective of the CBD was to remedy the market failure noted in cases such as that of the Hoodia cactus, the maca plant and the ayahuasca vine. This market failure depends on the fact that the countries where TKGR is found, the countries where traditional knowledge is developed are not the ones to reap the benefits of their application and use in research and commercial products. While the CBD constitutes the first international attempt to bring a certain institutional balance in the CBD market, it had to overcome a very important barrier, namely that of the strong and at the time of its entry into force, still growing stronger, Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) regime. The need to relate to the Intellectual Property (IP) system and to the extent possible, use it in order to achieve the Convention’s objectives has considerably influenced the final text of the CBD, as well as its implementation. It is also the existence of the IP system that has formed the subsequent international negotiations and the way contracting states (and non-contracting for that matter), have positioned themselves in the post-CBD negotiations.","PeriodicalId":125544,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Nagoya to Rio and Back, a Detour Through Brussels. The Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources in the EU\",\"authors\":\"F. Papadopoulou\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2924569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most important contribution for the international regulation and protection of traditional knowledge and genetic resources (TKGR) was made in Rio in 1992 by means of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The objective of the CBD was to remedy the market failure noted in cases such as that of the Hoodia cactus, the maca plant and the ayahuasca vine. This market failure depends on the fact that the countries where TKGR is found, the countries where traditional knowledge is developed are not the ones to reap the benefits of their application and use in research and commercial products. While the CBD constitutes the first international attempt to bring a certain institutional balance in the CBD market, it had to overcome a very important barrier, namely that of the strong and at the time of its entry into force, still growing stronger, Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) regime. The need to relate to the Intellectual Property (IP) system and to the extent possible, use it in order to achieve the Convention’s objectives has considerably influenced the final text of the CBD, as well as its implementation. It is also the existence of the IP system that has formed the subsequent international negotiations and the way contracting states (and non-contracting for that matter), have positioned themselves in the post-CBD negotiations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2924569\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2924569","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1992年在里约通过《生物多样性公约》对传统知识和遗传资源的国际管理和保护作出了最重要的贡献。《生物多样性公约》的目标是补救在胡迪亚仙人掌、玛卡植物和死藤等案例中注意到的市场失灵。这种市场失灵取决于这样一个事实,即发现TKGR的国家、开发传统知识的国家并不能从它们在研究和商业产品中的应用和使用中获益。虽然《生物多样性公约》是为生物多样性市场带来某种制度平衡的第一次国际尝试,但它必须克服一个非常重要的障碍,即强大的、在其生效时仍在日益强大的知识产权制度。涉及知识产权制度并尽可能利用这一制度以实现《公约》目标的需要,对《生物多样性公约》的最终案文及其实施产生了重大影响。知识产权制度的存在也形成了随后的国际谈判以及缔约国(和非缔约国)在后生物多样性公约谈判中定位自己的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Nagoya to Rio and Back, a Detour Through Brussels. The Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Genetic Resources in the EU
The most important contribution for the international regulation and protection of traditional knowledge and genetic resources (TKGR) was made in Rio in 1992 by means of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). The objective of the CBD was to remedy the market failure noted in cases such as that of the Hoodia cactus, the maca plant and the ayahuasca vine. This market failure depends on the fact that the countries where TKGR is found, the countries where traditional knowledge is developed are not the ones to reap the benefits of their application and use in research and commercial products. While the CBD constitutes the first international attempt to bring a certain institutional balance in the CBD market, it had to overcome a very important barrier, namely that of the strong and at the time of its entry into force, still growing stronger, Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) regime. The need to relate to the Intellectual Property (IP) system and to the extent possible, use it in order to achieve the Convention’s objectives has considerably influenced the final text of the CBD, as well as its implementation. It is also the existence of the IP system that has formed the subsequent international negotiations and the way contracting states (and non-contracting for that matter), have positioned themselves in the post-CBD negotiations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信