面向医疗服务的区块链数据可信度评价方法

M. Wang, Rong Jiang, Yue Yang, Chenguang Wang, Lin Zhang, Liang Yang, Xuetao Pu
{"title":"面向医疗服务的区块链数据可信度评价方法","authors":"M. Wang, Rong Jiang, Yue Yang, Chenguang Wang, Lin Zhang, Liang Yang, Xuetao Pu","doi":"10.1109/icss55994.2022.00050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the study of trusted platforms for medical services, many scholars use the tamper-evident property of blockchain and consensus mechanism to ensure the trusted storage and processing of on-chain data, but they ignore the basic and important issue of trustworthiness of blockchain medical data sources, i.e., medical data to be on-chain. The traditional data trustworthiness evaluation method monitors the historical behavior of data subjects, service quality and other characteristics, and then grades the trustworthiness of the data generated by them. However, this evaluation method has great limitations for medical data subjects (patients) who are highly mobile. Therefore, this paper proposes a trustworthiness evaluation method that combines skewed distribution and entropy weight method, classifies medical data and divides multiple evaluation indicators, integrates the weights of each indicator and performs statistical analysis and trustworthiness probability calculation on the indicators, so as to obtain the trustworthiness of the data to be chained and improve the quality of medical services.","PeriodicalId":327964,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Service Science (ICSS)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical service oriented blockchain data credibility evaluation method\",\"authors\":\"M. Wang, Rong Jiang, Yue Yang, Chenguang Wang, Lin Zhang, Liang Yang, Xuetao Pu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/icss55994.2022.00050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the study of trusted platforms for medical services, many scholars use the tamper-evident property of blockchain and consensus mechanism to ensure the trusted storage and processing of on-chain data, but they ignore the basic and important issue of trustworthiness of blockchain medical data sources, i.e., medical data to be on-chain. The traditional data trustworthiness evaluation method monitors the historical behavior of data subjects, service quality and other characteristics, and then grades the trustworthiness of the data generated by them. However, this evaluation method has great limitations for medical data subjects (patients) who are highly mobile. Therefore, this paper proposes a trustworthiness evaluation method that combines skewed distribution and entropy weight method, classifies medical data and divides multiple evaluation indicators, integrates the weights of each indicator and performs statistical analysis and trustworthiness probability calculation on the indicators, so as to obtain the trustworthiness of the data to be chained and improve the quality of medical services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":327964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 International Conference on Service Science (ICSS)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 International Conference on Service Science (ICSS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/icss55994.2022.00050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Service Science (ICSS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/icss55994.2022.00050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在医疗服务可信平台的研究中,许多学者利用区块链的防篡改特性和共识机制来保证链上数据的可信存储和处理,但忽略了区块链医疗数据源的可信度这一基本而重要的问题,即医疗数据的链上性。传统的数据可信度评价方法通过监测数据主体的历史行为、服务质量等特征,对其生成的数据的可信度进行分级。然而,这种评价方法对于高流动性的医疗数据主体(患者)有很大的局限性。因此,本文提出了一种将偏态分布和熵权法相结合的可信度评价方法,对医疗数据进行分类,划分多个评价指标,整合各指标的权重,对指标进行统计分析和可信度概率计算,从而获得待链数据的可信度,提高医疗服务质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medical service oriented blockchain data credibility evaluation method
In the study of trusted platforms for medical services, many scholars use the tamper-evident property of blockchain and consensus mechanism to ensure the trusted storage and processing of on-chain data, but they ignore the basic and important issue of trustworthiness of blockchain medical data sources, i.e., medical data to be on-chain. The traditional data trustworthiness evaluation method monitors the historical behavior of data subjects, service quality and other characteristics, and then grades the trustworthiness of the data generated by them. However, this evaluation method has great limitations for medical data subjects (patients) who are highly mobile. Therefore, this paper proposes a trustworthiness evaluation method that combines skewed distribution and entropy weight method, classifies medical data and divides multiple evaluation indicators, integrates the weights of each indicator and performs statistical analysis and trustworthiness probability calculation on the indicators, so as to obtain the trustworthiness of the data to be chained and improve the quality of medical services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信