利用各种状态监测指标评价齿轮点蚀严重程度

Camelia Rodica Sfetcu, Z. Korka, A. Bloju, Dalina Elena Traistaru, Corneliu Hrimiuc
{"title":"利用各种状态监测指标评价齿轮点蚀严重程度","authors":"Camelia Rodica Sfetcu, Z. Korka, A. Bloju, Dalina Elena Traistaru, Corneliu Hrimiuc","doi":"10.14232/analecta.2022.1.34-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fault detection techniques based on vibration measurement are implemented to identify in an early stage failures appearing in gear transmissions. Condition monitoring indicators (CMI), like: Root Mean Square (RMS), Crest Factor, Kurtosis, FMO, FM4, Energy ratio, Energy operator, NA4 or NB4, are used to estimate the level of gear faults such as pitting, cracks, spalling, scuffing or scoring. However, in is multitude of indicators, the question that arises is: which CMI is the most sensitive in estimating the severity of defects? Thus, this paper presents an extensive comparison between the before mentioned indicators computed from vibration signals collected on four pinions with different pitting grades, created by artificial means. The pinions where incorporated in a single helical gearbox and the tests were performed on an open-energy test rig at three different input speeds. This comparative study assesses the receptivity of different condition monitoring indicators towards gear pitting failure.","PeriodicalId":213647,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Technica Szegedinensia","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of gear pitting severity by using various condition monitoring indicators\",\"authors\":\"Camelia Rodica Sfetcu, Z. Korka, A. Bloju, Dalina Elena Traistaru, Corneliu Hrimiuc\",\"doi\":\"10.14232/analecta.2022.1.34-41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fault detection techniques based on vibration measurement are implemented to identify in an early stage failures appearing in gear transmissions. Condition monitoring indicators (CMI), like: Root Mean Square (RMS), Crest Factor, Kurtosis, FMO, FM4, Energy ratio, Energy operator, NA4 or NB4, are used to estimate the level of gear faults such as pitting, cracks, spalling, scuffing or scoring. However, in is multitude of indicators, the question that arises is: which CMI is the most sensitive in estimating the severity of defects? Thus, this paper presents an extensive comparison between the before mentioned indicators computed from vibration signals collected on four pinions with different pitting grades, created by artificial means. The pinions where incorporated in a single helical gearbox and the tests were performed on an open-energy test rig at three different input speeds. This comparative study assesses the receptivity of different condition monitoring indicators towards gear pitting failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analecta Technica Szegedinensia\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analecta Technica Szegedinensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2022.1.34-41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analecta Technica Szegedinensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2022.1.34-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用基于振动测量的故障检测技术,对齿轮传动系统出现的故障进行早期识别。状态监测指标(CMI),如:均方根(RMS),波峰系数,峰度,FMO, FM4,能量比,能量算子,NA4或NB4,用于估计齿轮故障的水平,如点蚀,裂纹,剥落,磨损或划伤。然而,在众多的指标中,出现的问题是:哪一个CMI在估计缺陷的严重程度方面是最敏感的?因此,本文对上述指标进行了广泛的比较,这些指标是从人工制造的不同点蚀等级的四个小齿轮上收集的振动信号中计算出来的。这些小齿轮被整合在一个单一的螺旋齿轮箱中,并在一个开放能量试验台上以三种不同的输入速度进行测试。本比较研究评估了不同状态监测指标对齿轮点蚀失效的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of gear pitting severity by using various condition monitoring indicators
Fault detection techniques based on vibration measurement are implemented to identify in an early stage failures appearing in gear transmissions. Condition monitoring indicators (CMI), like: Root Mean Square (RMS), Crest Factor, Kurtosis, FMO, FM4, Energy ratio, Energy operator, NA4 or NB4, are used to estimate the level of gear faults such as pitting, cracks, spalling, scuffing or scoring. However, in is multitude of indicators, the question that arises is: which CMI is the most sensitive in estimating the severity of defects? Thus, this paper presents an extensive comparison between the before mentioned indicators computed from vibration signals collected on four pinions with different pitting grades, created by artificial means. The pinions where incorporated in a single helical gearbox and the tests were performed on an open-energy test rig at three different input speeds. This comparative study assesses the receptivity of different condition monitoring indicators towards gear pitting failure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信