Camelia Rodica Sfetcu, Z. Korka, A. Bloju, Dalina Elena Traistaru, Corneliu Hrimiuc
{"title":"利用各种状态监测指标评价齿轮点蚀严重程度","authors":"Camelia Rodica Sfetcu, Z. Korka, A. Bloju, Dalina Elena Traistaru, Corneliu Hrimiuc","doi":"10.14232/analecta.2022.1.34-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fault detection techniques based on vibration measurement are implemented to identify in an early stage failures appearing in gear transmissions. Condition monitoring indicators (CMI), like: Root Mean Square (RMS), Crest Factor, Kurtosis, FMO, FM4, Energy ratio, Energy operator, NA4 or NB4, are used to estimate the level of gear faults such as pitting, cracks, spalling, scuffing or scoring. However, in is multitude of indicators, the question that arises is: which CMI is the most sensitive in estimating the severity of defects? Thus, this paper presents an extensive comparison between the before mentioned indicators computed from vibration signals collected on four pinions with different pitting grades, created by artificial means. The pinions where incorporated in a single helical gearbox and the tests were performed on an open-energy test rig at three different input speeds. This comparative study assesses the receptivity of different condition monitoring indicators towards gear pitting failure.","PeriodicalId":213647,"journal":{"name":"Analecta Technica Szegedinensia","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of gear pitting severity by using various condition monitoring indicators\",\"authors\":\"Camelia Rodica Sfetcu, Z. Korka, A. Bloju, Dalina Elena Traistaru, Corneliu Hrimiuc\",\"doi\":\"10.14232/analecta.2022.1.34-41\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fault detection techniques based on vibration measurement are implemented to identify in an early stage failures appearing in gear transmissions. Condition monitoring indicators (CMI), like: Root Mean Square (RMS), Crest Factor, Kurtosis, FMO, FM4, Energy ratio, Energy operator, NA4 or NB4, are used to estimate the level of gear faults such as pitting, cracks, spalling, scuffing or scoring. However, in is multitude of indicators, the question that arises is: which CMI is the most sensitive in estimating the severity of defects? Thus, this paper presents an extensive comparison between the before mentioned indicators computed from vibration signals collected on four pinions with different pitting grades, created by artificial means. The pinions where incorporated in a single helical gearbox and the tests were performed on an open-energy test rig at three different input speeds. This comparative study assesses the receptivity of different condition monitoring indicators towards gear pitting failure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analecta Technica Szegedinensia\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analecta Technica Szegedinensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2022.1.34-41\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analecta Technica Szegedinensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14232/analecta.2022.1.34-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of gear pitting severity by using various condition monitoring indicators
Fault detection techniques based on vibration measurement are implemented to identify in an early stage failures appearing in gear transmissions. Condition monitoring indicators (CMI), like: Root Mean Square (RMS), Crest Factor, Kurtosis, FMO, FM4, Energy ratio, Energy operator, NA4 or NB4, are used to estimate the level of gear faults such as pitting, cracks, spalling, scuffing or scoring. However, in is multitude of indicators, the question that arises is: which CMI is the most sensitive in estimating the severity of defects? Thus, this paper presents an extensive comparison between the before mentioned indicators computed from vibration signals collected on four pinions with different pitting grades, created by artificial means. The pinions where incorporated in a single helical gearbox and the tests were performed on an open-energy test rig at three different input speeds. This comparative study assesses the receptivity of different condition monitoring indicators towards gear pitting failure.