聪明得难以言表:俄勒冈州7号法案的废止

E. Sullivan
{"title":"聪明得难以言表:俄勒冈州7号法案的废止","authors":"E. Sullivan","doi":"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract On October 4 2002, the Oregon Supreme Court upheld invalidation of a voter-approved measure that would have required government payment for most regulations that had the effect of devaluing property. The court held that the measure, is presented, violated those provisions for amending the Oregon Constitution requiring separate votes on each state constitutional provision amended unless the amendments were “closely related.” By excepting certain disfavored uses—such as bars, casinos, and strip clubs—from the payment scheme, the court ruled that the drafters of the measure impermissibly implicated other rights protected by the state constitution. Thus ended a journey that had begun with an effort to gain government payments for regulation and ended with a determination that negating that payment for uses that involved expressive conduct undermined the measure.","PeriodicalId":154411,"journal":{"name":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","volume":"2493 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Too Clever for Words: The Demise of Oregon's Measure 7\",\"authors\":\"E. Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00947598.2002.10394788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract On October 4 2002, the Oregon Supreme Court upheld invalidation of a voter-approved measure that would have required government payment for most regulations that had the effect of devaluing property. The court held that the measure, is presented, violated those provisions for amending the Oregon Constitution requiring separate votes on each state constitutional provision amended unless the amendments were “closely related.” By excepting certain disfavored uses—such as bars, casinos, and strip clubs—from the payment scheme, the court ruled that the drafters of the measure impermissibly implicated other rights protected by the state constitution. Thus ended a journey that had begun with an effort to gain government payments for regulation and ended with a determination that negating that payment for uses that involved expressive conduct undermined the measure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest\",\"volume\":\"2493 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use Law & Zoning Digest","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00947598.2002.10394788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2002年10月4日,俄勒冈州最高法院裁定选民通过的一项法案无效,该法案要求政府为大多数导致财产贬值的法规买单。法院认为,该措施违反了修改俄勒冈州宪法的规定,该规定要求对每一项被修改的州宪法条款进行单独投票,除非修正案“密切相关”。通过将某些不受欢迎的用途——如酒吧、赌场和脱衣舞俱乐部——排除在支付计划之外,法院裁定,该措施的起草者不允许牵连到受州宪法保护的其他权利。这样结束了一段旅程,这段旅程开始于争取政府为监管支付费用的努力,结束于否定为涉及表达性行为的使用支付费用破坏了该措施的决心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Too Clever for Words: The Demise of Oregon's Measure 7
Abstract On October 4 2002, the Oregon Supreme Court upheld invalidation of a voter-approved measure that would have required government payment for most regulations that had the effect of devaluing property. The court held that the measure, is presented, violated those provisions for amending the Oregon Constitution requiring separate votes on each state constitutional provision amended unless the amendments were “closely related.” By excepting certain disfavored uses—such as bars, casinos, and strip clubs—from the payment scheme, the court ruled that the drafters of the measure impermissibly implicated other rights protected by the state constitution. Thus ended a journey that had begun with an effort to gain government payments for regulation and ended with a determination that negating that payment for uses that involved expressive conduct undermined the measure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信