平台内纠纷与民主裁决

P. Xue, Rongdong Zhang
{"title":"平台内纠纷与民主裁决","authors":"P. Xue, Rongdong Zhang","doi":"10.23977/law.2022.010208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": History has selected and determined the position of the court in reconciling the conflict of rights, but this judicial mechanism is not omnipotent, and the cost of litigation and the complicated procedure have become the first threshold. These preconditions make people with the desire for rights subject to rational guidance to decide whether to continue to maintain rights, especially when the object of dispute is relatively small. Some e-commerce platforms have developed a mechanism to deal with internal disputes through mutual review among users. Whether this can become an ideal means to supplement traditional justice is a topic that needs to be discussed under the Internet economy.","PeriodicalId":271650,"journal":{"name":"Science of Law Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-platform disputes and democratic adjudication\",\"authors\":\"P. Xue, Rongdong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.23977/law.2022.010208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": History has selected and determined the position of the court in reconciling the conflict of rights, but this judicial mechanism is not omnipotent, and the cost of litigation and the complicated procedure have become the first threshold. These preconditions make people with the desire for rights subject to rational guidance to decide whether to continue to maintain rights, especially when the object of dispute is relatively small. Some e-commerce platforms have developed a mechanism to deal with internal disputes through mutual review among users. Whether this can become an ideal means to supplement traditional justice is a topic that needs to be discussed under the Internet economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2022.010208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2022.010208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:历史选择并确定了法院在调解权利冲突中的地位,但这种司法机制并非万能,诉讼成本和复杂的程序成为第一道门槛。这些前提条件使有权利欲望的人在理性的指导下决定是否继续维护权利,尤其是当争议对象相对较小的时候。一些电子商务平台已经建立了一种机制,通过用户之间的相互审查来处理内部纠纷。这能否成为补充传统司法的理想手段,是互联网经济下需要探讨的话题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intra-platform disputes and democratic adjudication
: History has selected and determined the position of the court in reconciling the conflict of rights, but this judicial mechanism is not omnipotent, and the cost of litigation and the complicated procedure have become the first threshold. These preconditions make people with the desire for rights subject to rational guidance to decide whether to continue to maintain rights, especially when the object of dispute is relatively small. Some e-commerce platforms have developed a mechanism to deal with internal disputes through mutual review among users. Whether this can become an ideal means to supplement traditional justice is a topic that needs to be discussed under the Internet economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信