{"title":"卡恩1931年6月在《经济杂志》上发表的乘数文章中的数学风格,与凯恩斯从1921年开始在《概率论》(A Treatise on Probability)中呈现数学结果的风格相同","authors":"M. E. Brady","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3286471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The manner in which R. Kahn presented his mathematical results on the multiplier in the Economic Journal of June, 1931, is identical to the style of presenting mathematical results used by Keynes to present his mathematical analysis starting with the A Treatise on Probability in 1921. Keynes’s style was to present only the initial statement of the problem and the main, final results. Keynes assumed that the mathematically interested reader would have sufficient training to be able to work backwards from the final result that he had given to the intermediate steps. A mathematically trained reader would finally arrive at the initial conditions that had been set up to specify what the problem was.<br><br>This style is in contrast to all of the other presentations made by Kahn, who would incorporate intermediate steps.<br><br>The only conclusion which is possible is that Keynes, who was the editor of the EJ and probably the referee of Kahn’s paper, showed Kahn his analysis from the A Treatise on Probability in 1921 dealing with the problem of taking the limit of a geometrical series of declining, infinite numbers, so as to arrive at a finite sum for the series. The only difference between Kahn and Keynes is that Kahn uses the variable k, whereas Keynes used the variable q. Nowhere in his 1931 article does Kahn present any technical explanation of how he arrives at the limit value or provide any of the needed, intermediate steps required in order to arrive at the finite answer.","PeriodicalId":176096,"journal":{"name":"Economic History eJournal","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kahn’s Mathematical Style, in His June, 1931 Multiplier Article in the Economic Journal, Is Identical to Keynes’ Style of Presenting Mathematical Results Starting in 1921 in the A Treatise on Probability\",\"authors\":\"M. E. Brady\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3286471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The manner in which R. Kahn presented his mathematical results on the multiplier in the Economic Journal of June, 1931, is identical to the style of presenting mathematical results used by Keynes to present his mathematical analysis starting with the A Treatise on Probability in 1921. Keynes’s style was to present only the initial statement of the problem and the main, final results. Keynes assumed that the mathematically interested reader would have sufficient training to be able to work backwards from the final result that he had given to the intermediate steps. A mathematically trained reader would finally arrive at the initial conditions that had been set up to specify what the problem was.<br><br>This style is in contrast to all of the other presentations made by Kahn, who would incorporate intermediate steps.<br><br>The only conclusion which is possible is that Keynes, who was the editor of the EJ and probably the referee of Kahn’s paper, showed Kahn his analysis from the A Treatise on Probability in 1921 dealing with the problem of taking the limit of a geometrical series of declining, infinite numbers, so as to arrive at a finite sum for the series. The only difference between Kahn and Keynes is that Kahn uses the variable k, whereas Keynes used the variable q. Nowhere in his 1931 article does Kahn present any technical explanation of how he arrives at the limit value or provide any of the needed, intermediate steps required in order to arrive at the finite answer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic History eJournal\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic History eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3286471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic History eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3286471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
卡恩在1931年6月的《经济杂志》(Economic Journal)上展示乘数数学结果的方式,与凯恩斯在1921年发表《概率论》(A Treatise on Probability)以来展示数学分析所用的数学结果的风格相同。凯恩斯的风格是只提出问题的初步陈述和主要的、最终的结果。凯恩斯认为,对数学感兴趣的读者应该受过足够的训练,能够从他给出的最终结果回溯到中间步骤。一个受过数学训练的读者最终会得到用来说明问题所在的初始条件。这种风格与卡恩所做的所有其他展示形成鲜明对比,他会采用中间步骤。唯一可能的结论是,凯恩斯是《经济学人》的编辑,也可能是卡恩论文的审稿人,他向卡恩展示了他在1921年的《概率论》(A Treatise on Probability)中所做的分析,该分析处理的问题是取递减的无限数的几何级数的极限,从而得出该级数的有限和。卡恩和凯恩斯之间的唯一区别是,卡恩使用了变量k,而凯恩斯使用了变量q。在他1931年的文章中,卡恩没有提供任何技术解释,说明他是如何得到极限值的,也没有提供任何必要的中间步骤,以便得到有限的答案。
Kahn’s Mathematical Style, in His June, 1931 Multiplier Article in the Economic Journal, Is Identical to Keynes’ Style of Presenting Mathematical Results Starting in 1921 in the A Treatise on Probability
The manner in which R. Kahn presented his mathematical results on the multiplier in the Economic Journal of June, 1931, is identical to the style of presenting mathematical results used by Keynes to present his mathematical analysis starting with the A Treatise on Probability in 1921. Keynes’s style was to present only the initial statement of the problem and the main, final results. Keynes assumed that the mathematically interested reader would have sufficient training to be able to work backwards from the final result that he had given to the intermediate steps. A mathematically trained reader would finally arrive at the initial conditions that had been set up to specify what the problem was.
This style is in contrast to all of the other presentations made by Kahn, who would incorporate intermediate steps.
The only conclusion which is possible is that Keynes, who was the editor of the EJ and probably the referee of Kahn’s paper, showed Kahn his analysis from the A Treatise on Probability in 1921 dealing with the problem of taking the limit of a geometrical series of declining, infinite numbers, so as to arrive at a finite sum for the series. The only difference between Kahn and Keynes is that Kahn uses the variable k, whereas Keynes used the variable q. Nowhere in his 1931 article does Kahn present any technical explanation of how he arrives at the limit value or provide any of the needed, intermediate steps required in order to arrive at the finite answer.