企业对新西兰排放交易计划的看法

Robert C. Brears
{"title":"企业对新西兰排放交易计划的看法","authors":"Robert C. Brears","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1309927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores, through semi-structured interviews, companies' perspectives from the mining, electricity and forestry industry on the key design elements of the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS), which are linking, pricing, liquidity, enforcement and allocation of credits. The results are as such. Regarding linkage, participants wish to link the NZ ETS with other schemes as climate change is a global issue in addition to providing lower abatement costs. There are two main arguments on the pricing of New Zealand emissions units (NZUs): floating and fixed price. Greater information disclosure and regulatory certainty will increase liquidity. There needs to be an independent regulator to ensure no political interference. The allocation of credits is a contentious issue with an almost unanimous agreement that an intensity-based regime is fairer. The linking of the NZ ETS enables a global concerted effort to reduce climate change. A two-staged pricing mechanism will protect the economy from international emission price volatility. In addition, a two-staged allocation regime from intensity to absolute obligation will provide an equitable base.","PeriodicalId":219371,"journal":{"name":"SEIN Environmental Impacts of Business eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Companies' Perspectives of The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme\",\"authors\":\"Robert C. Brears\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1309927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores, through semi-structured interviews, companies' perspectives from the mining, electricity and forestry industry on the key design elements of the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS), which are linking, pricing, liquidity, enforcement and allocation of credits. The results are as such. Regarding linkage, participants wish to link the NZ ETS with other schemes as climate change is a global issue in addition to providing lower abatement costs. There are two main arguments on the pricing of New Zealand emissions units (NZUs): floating and fixed price. Greater information disclosure and regulatory certainty will increase liquidity. There needs to be an independent regulator to ensure no political interference. The allocation of credits is a contentious issue with an almost unanimous agreement that an intensity-based regime is fairer. The linking of the NZ ETS enables a global concerted effort to reduce climate change. A two-staged pricing mechanism will protect the economy from international emission price volatility. In addition, a two-staged allocation regime from intensity to absolute obligation will provide an equitable base.\",\"PeriodicalId\":219371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SEIN Environmental Impacts of Business eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SEIN Environmental Impacts of Business eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1309927\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEIN Environmental Impacts of Business eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1309927","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究通过半结构化访谈,从矿业、电力和林业行业的公司角度探讨了新西兰排放交易计划(NZ ETS)的关键设计要素,即信用额度的联系、定价、流动性、执行和分配。结果是这样的。在联系方面,参与者希望将新西兰排放交易体系与其他计划联系起来,因为气候变化是一个全球性问题,除了提供更低的减排成本之外。关于新西兰排放单位(NZUs)的定价有两种主要观点:浮动价格和固定价格。更多的信息披露和监管确定性将增加流动性。需要有一个独立的监管机构来确保没有政治干预。信用额度的分配是一个有争议的问题,人们几乎一致认为,基于强度的机制更公平。新西兰排放交易体系之间的联系使全球共同努力减少气候变化。两阶段定价机制将保护经济不受国际排放价格波动的影响。此外,从强度到绝对义务的两阶段分配制度将提供一个公平的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Companies' Perspectives of The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme
This study explores, through semi-structured interviews, companies' perspectives from the mining, electricity and forestry industry on the key design elements of the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme (NZ ETS), which are linking, pricing, liquidity, enforcement and allocation of credits. The results are as such. Regarding linkage, participants wish to link the NZ ETS with other schemes as climate change is a global issue in addition to providing lower abatement costs. There are two main arguments on the pricing of New Zealand emissions units (NZUs): floating and fixed price. Greater information disclosure and regulatory certainty will increase liquidity. There needs to be an independent regulator to ensure no political interference. The allocation of credits is a contentious issue with an almost unanimous agreement that an intensity-based regime is fairer. The linking of the NZ ETS enables a global concerted effort to reduce climate change. A two-staged pricing mechanism will protect the economy from international emission price volatility. In addition, a two-staged allocation regime from intensity to absolute obligation will provide an equitable base.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信