转诊在劳动力市场的不流动性、不平等和低效率中的作用

Lukas Bolte, Nicole Immorlica, M. Jackson
{"title":"转诊在劳动力市场的不流动性、不平等和低效率中的作用","authors":"Lukas Bolte, Nicole Immorlica, M. Jackson","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3512293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the consequences of job markets' heavy reliance on referrals. Referrals screen candidates and lead to better matches and increased productivity, but disadvantage job-seekers who have few or no connections to employed workers, leading to increased inequality. Coupled with homophily, referrals also lead to immobility: a demographic group's low employment rate in one period leads that group to have relatively low employment in future periods as well. We identify conditions under which distributing referrals more evenly across a population not only reduces inequality, but also improves economic mobility across generations as well as future productivity. We use the model to examine optimal policies, showing that one-time affirmative action policies involve short-run production losses, but lead to long-term improvements in equality, mobility, and productivity due to induced changes in future referrals. We also show how the possibility of firing workers changes the effects of referrals.","PeriodicalId":448175,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Referrals in Immobility, Inequality, and Inefficiency in Labor Markets\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Bolte, Nicole Immorlica, M. Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3512293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the consequences of job markets' heavy reliance on referrals. Referrals screen candidates and lead to better matches and increased productivity, but disadvantage job-seekers who have few or no connections to employed workers, leading to increased inequality. Coupled with homophily, referrals also lead to immobility: a demographic group's low employment rate in one period leads that group to have relatively low employment in future periods as well. We identify conditions under which distributing referrals more evenly across a population not only reduces inequality, but also improves economic mobility across generations as well as future productivity. We use the model to examine optimal policies, showing that one-time affirmative action policies involve short-run production losses, but lead to long-term improvements in equality, mobility, and productivity due to induced changes in future referrals. We also show how the possibility of firing workers changes the effects of referrals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":448175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3512293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Political Economy: Comparative Capitalism eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3512293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

我们研究了就业市场严重依赖推荐人的后果。推荐会筛选候选人,带来更好的匹配和更高的生产率,但对那些与在职员工很少或没有联系的求职者不利,导致不平等加剧。再加上同质性,转介也导致不流动性:一个人口群体在一个时期的低就业率导致该群体在未来时期的就业率也相对较低。我们确定了在人口中更均匀地分配转诊的条件,不仅可以减少不平等,还可以提高代际经济流动性和未来生产率。我们使用该模型来检验最优政策,结果表明,一次性平权行动政策涉及短期的生产损失,但由于未来引荐的诱导变化,导致了平等、流动性和生产率的长期改善。我们还展示了解雇员工的可能性如何改变推荐的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Referrals in Immobility, Inequality, and Inefficiency in Labor Markets
We study the consequences of job markets' heavy reliance on referrals. Referrals screen candidates and lead to better matches and increased productivity, but disadvantage job-seekers who have few or no connections to employed workers, leading to increased inequality. Coupled with homophily, referrals also lead to immobility: a demographic group's low employment rate in one period leads that group to have relatively low employment in future periods as well. We identify conditions under which distributing referrals more evenly across a population not only reduces inequality, but also improves economic mobility across generations as well as future productivity. We use the model to examine optimal policies, showing that one-time affirmative action policies involve short-run production losses, but lead to long-term improvements in equality, mobility, and productivity due to induced changes in future referrals. We also show how the possibility of firing workers changes the effects of referrals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信