《系统分析与设计:一种结构化的方法》,Davis, William S.著,Addison-Wesley出版公司,1983年

John F. Schrage
{"title":"《系统分析与设计:一种结构化的方法》,Davis, William S.著,Addison-Wesley出版公司,1983年","authors":"John F. Schrage","doi":"10.1145/1113500.1113509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"About ten years ago, the structured concepts hit programming, and books were published with \"structured\" in the title but little in the material. The structured programs concept was easy to see but adapting it by programmers was difficult. Structured for systems is now becoming popular, and in the same fashion, \"structured\" is somewhere in the title. In addition, the structured systems concepts have several methodologies and few examples have been available without high costs to an organization. The above noted book seems to have met the challenge of content and examples better than others I have examined or reviewed. While some books have been strong in content, the examples have been weak. Also some books have emphasized more real methodology or skimmed several.","PeriodicalId":152518,"journal":{"name":"ACM Sigmis Database","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of \\\"Systems Analysis and Design: A Structured Approach, by Davis, William S.\\\", Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1983\",\"authors\":\"John F. Schrage\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1113500.1113509\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"About ten years ago, the structured concepts hit programming, and books were published with \\\"structured\\\" in the title but little in the material. The structured programs concept was easy to see but adapting it by programmers was difficult. Structured for systems is now becoming popular, and in the same fashion, \\\"structured\\\" is somewhere in the title. In addition, the structured systems concepts have several methodologies and few examples have been available without high costs to an organization. The above noted book seems to have met the challenge of content and examples better than others I have examined or reviewed. While some books have been strong in content, the examples have been weak. Also some books have emphasized more real methodology or skimmed several.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Sigmis Database\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Sigmis Database\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1113500.1113509\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Sigmis Database","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1113500.1113509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大约十年前,结构化概念开始流行于编程领域,出版的书籍标题中都有“结构化”,但材料中却很少有。结构化程序的概念很容易理解,但程序员很难适应它。系统的结构化现在变得流行起来,以同样的方式,“结构化”在标题的某个地方。此外,结构化系统概念有几种方法,并且很少有例子可以在不给组织带来高成本的情况下使用。上面提到的书似乎比我看过或看过的其他书更好地应对了内容和例子的挑战。虽然有些书在内容上很强大,但例子却很薄弱。还有一些书强调了更真实的方法论,或者略读了一些。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of "Systems Analysis and Design: A Structured Approach, by Davis, William S.", Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1983
About ten years ago, the structured concepts hit programming, and books were published with "structured" in the title but little in the material. The structured programs concept was easy to see but adapting it by programmers was difficult. Structured for systems is now becoming popular, and in the same fashion, "structured" is somewhere in the title. In addition, the structured systems concepts have several methodologies and few examples have been available without high costs to an organization. The above noted book seems to have met the challenge of content and examples better than others I have examined or reviewed. While some books have been strong in content, the examples have been weak. Also some books have emphasized more real methodology or skimmed several.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信