Corrigendum:多面性人性检查II重组版(MMPI-2-RF)对比创伤后应激障碍、主要抑郁障碍和工兵障碍的临床特征[Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 1-20]

Choi Ji Young, Kim,Keun-Hyang, Eun-Hee Park
{"title":"Corrigendum:多面性人性检查II重组版(MMPI-2-RF)对比创伤后应激障碍、主要抑郁障碍和工兵障碍的临床特征[Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 1-20]","authors":"Choi Ji Young, Kim,Keun-Hyang, Eun-Hee Park","doi":"10.15842/KJCP.2017.36.1.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to examine the similarities and distinctiveness among Postraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Major depressive disorder (MDD), and co-occuring PTSD and Depressive disorder (DD) with MMPI-2-RF. Data of 187 patients (59 with PTSD, 69 with MDD, 59 with PTSD+DD) were collected from the Department of Psychiatry of three university hospitals. Using Minnesota Multiple Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF), clinical characteristics were compared to determine which scale has utility in differentiating among the groups. Significant differences in all of the Higher-Order (H-O) Scales, almost of the Restructured Clinical Scales and the Specific Problems Scales were observed among three groups. Multinominal logistic regression analyses showed that Emotion/Internalizing Dysfunction (EID) and Thought Dysfunction (THD) in H-O Scales were useful in differentiating between PTSD and MDD. Emotion/ Internalizing Dysfunction (EID) in H-O Scale, Malaise(MLS) in Somatic/Cognitive Scales and Negative Emotionality/Neuroticism-Revised (NEGE-r) in PSY-5 Scales were significant predictors in distinguishing comorbid group from PTSD. The results suggest that there are distinct clinical characteristics among the three groups, although PTSD, MDD, and comorbid group share many symptoms.","PeriodicalId":115450,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corrigendum: 다면적 인성검사 II 재구성판(MMPI-2-RF)으로 살펴본 외상후스트레스장애군과 주요우울장애, 그리고 공병장애군의 임상 특성 비교 [Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 1-20]\",\"authors\":\"Choi Ji Young, Kim,Keun-Hyang, Eun-Hee Park\",\"doi\":\"10.15842/KJCP.2017.36.1.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to examine the similarities and distinctiveness among Postraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Major depressive disorder (MDD), and co-occuring PTSD and Depressive disorder (DD) with MMPI-2-RF. Data of 187 patients (59 with PTSD, 69 with MDD, 59 with PTSD+DD) were collected from the Department of Psychiatry of three university hospitals. Using Minnesota Multiple Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF), clinical characteristics were compared to determine which scale has utility in differentiating among the groups. Significant differences in all of the Higher-Order (H-O) Scales, almost of the Restructured Clinical Scales and the Specific Problems Scales were observed among three groups. Multinominal logistic regression analyses showed that Emotion/Internalizing Dysfunction (EID) and Thought Dysfunction (THD) in H-O Scales were useful in differentiating between PTSD and MDD. Emotion/ Internalizing Dysfunction (EID) in H-O Scale, Malaise(MLS) in Somatic/Cognitive Scales and Negative Emotionality/Neuroticism-Revised (NEGE-r) in PSY-5 Scales were significant predictors in distinguishing comorbid group from PTSD. The results suggest that there are distinct clinical characteristics among the three groups, although PTSD, MDD, and comorbid group share many symptoms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15842/KJCP.2017.36.1.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15842/KJCP.2017.36.1.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨MMPI-2-RF在创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、重度抑郁障碍(MDD)及合并PTSD和抑郁障碍(DD)之间的相似性和差异性。从3所大学附属医院精神科收集187例患者资料,其中PTSD合并59例,MDD合并69例,PTSD+DD合并59例。使用明尼苏达多重人格量表-2-重构表(MMPI-2-RF),比较临床特征,以确定哪种量表在区分组间具有效用。三组患者在所有高阶(H-O)量表、几乎所有重构临床量表和特定问题量表上均存在显著差异。多项逻辑回归分析显示,H-O量表中的情绪/内化功能障碍(EID)和思维功能障碍(THD)可用于区分PTSD和MDD。H-O量表中的情绪/内化功能障碍(EID)、躯体/认知量表中的不适(MLS)和心理-5量表中的负情绪/神经质修正(NEGE-r)是区分共病组与PTSD的显著预测因子。结果表明,尽管PTSD、MDD和共病组有许多共同的症状,但三组之间存在明显的临床特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corrigendum: 다면적 인성검사 II 재구성판(MMPI-2-RF)으로 살펴본 외상후스트레스장애군과 주요우울장애, 그리고 공병장애군의 임상 특성 비교 [Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 35, 1-20]
The purpose of this study was to examine the similarities and distinctiveness among Postraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Major depressive disorder (MDD), and co-occuring PTSD and Depressive disorder (DD) with MMPI-2-RF. Data of 187 patients (59 with PTSD, 69 with MDD, 59 with PTSD+DD) were collected from the Department of Psychiatry of three university hospitals. Using Minnesota Multiple Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF), clinical characteristics were compared to determine which scale has utility in differentiating among the groups. Significant differences in all of the Higher-Order (H-O) Scales, almost of the Restructured Clinical Scales and the Specific Problems Scales were observed among three groups. Multinominal logistic regression analyses showed that Emotion/Internalizing Dysfunction (EID) and Thought Dysfunction (THD) in H-O Scales were useful in differentiating between PTSD and MDD. Emotion/ Internalizing Dysfunction (EID) in H-O Scale, Malaise(MLS) in Somatic/Cognitive Scales and Negative Emotionality/Neuroticism-Revised (NEGE-r) in PSY-5 Scales were significant predictors in distinguishing comorbid group from PTSD. The results suggest that there are distinct clinical characteristics among the three groups, although PTSD, MDD, and comorbid group share many symptoms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信