Ł. Kuczek, W. Muzykiewicz, Marcin Mroczkowski, M. Wieczorek
{"title":"Propozycja modyfikacji metody miseczkowania AEG oceny tłoczności blach","authors":"Ł. Kuczek, W. Muzykiewicz, Marcin Mroczkowski, M. Wieczorek","doi":"10.7494/978-83-66727-48-9_6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The limiting drawing ratio is determined in the Swift deep drawing cup test or the AEG cupping method. However, the results obtained with the two methods may differ significantly. The total number of three measurement points (blank diameters) in the AEG method is insufficient. The paper proposes a modification of this method by using a larger number of measuring points, both for the maximum drawing force and the fracture force. Other, than linear, types of approximation functions were also analyzed (power, exponential function). With a greater number of points, the curvilinear character of the change in the maximum value of the drawing force as a function of the drawing ratio K1 was found, as well as the decrease in the fracture force value with the increase of the blank diameter. It was found that for the determination of the limiting drawing ratio by the modified AEG cupping method, the optimum is the description of the maximum force variation with a power function based on three representative measurement points, and the fracture force with a linear function based on at least two points. This made it possible to obtain results comparable to those obtained with the Swift cup test.","PeriodicalId":165954,"journal":{"name":"Nauka – Technika – Technologia. Tom 2","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauka – Technika – Technologia. Tom 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7494/978-83-66727-48-9_6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

极限拉拔比由Swift深拉杯试验或AEG拔罐法确定。然而,用这两种方法得到的结果可能有很大的不同。AEG法三个测点(毛坯直径)总数不足。本文提出了一种改进方法,在最大拉伸力和断裂力的测量中使用更多的测点。除线性函数外,还分析了其他类型的近似函数(幂函数、指数函数)。当点数较大时,拉伸力最大值随拉伸比K1的变化呈曲线特征,断裂力值随毛坯直径的增大而减小。研究发现,修正AEG拔罐法确定极限拉伸比时,最优的方法是基于3个代表性测点的幂函数描述最大力变化,以及基于至少2个代表性测点的线性函数描述断裂力。这使得获得与斯威夫特杯试验相当的结果成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Propozycja modyfikacji metody miseczkowania AEG oceny tłoczności blach
The limiting drawing ratio is determined in the Swift deep drawing cup test or the AEG cupping method. However, the results obtained with the two methods may differ significantly. The total number of three measurement points (blank diameters) in the AEG method is insufficient. The paper proposes a modification of this method by using a larger number of measuring points, both for the maximum drawing force and the fracture force. Other, than linear, types of approximation functions were also analyzed (power, exponential function). With a greater number of points, the curvilinear character of the change in the maximum value of the drawing force as a function of the drawing ratio K1 was found, as well as the decrease in the fracture force value with the increase of the blank diameter. It was found that for the determination of the limiting drawing ratio by the modified AEG cupping method, the optimum is the description of the maximum force variation with a power function based on three representative measurement points, and the fracture force with a linear function based on at least two points. This made it possible to obtain results comparable to those obtained with the Swift cup test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信