欧盟和美国对社交媒体算法的行政规制及其对中国的启示

Ting-ting Cai
{"title":"欧盟和美国对社交媒体算法的行政规制及其对中国的启示","authors":"Ting-ting Cai","doi":"10.22457/jmhr.v09a012355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While social media algorithms have brought positive effects, they have also brought a series of crises that have sparked public concern about algorithmic technology. In response, many countries have adopted a series of regulations on platform algorithms. The EU mainly adopts a collaborative regulatory model between administrative agencies and private institutions, emphasizing both ex-ante and ex-post regulation of algorithms, and further reinforcing the obligations and responsibilities of social media platforms, as well as adopting focused regulation on large social media platforms. The U.S. mainly focuses on external accountability, industry self-regulation, and the protection of freedom of expression and democratic politics. By analyzing the dynamics and practices of administrative regulation of social media algorithms in the EU and the U.S., it is suggested that China should: build a multiple regulation model, realize the substantial participation of other subjects, explore the hierarchical and categorical regulation of social media platforms, strengthen the construction of anti-monopoly for large social media platforms, and enhance the whole process regulation of social media algorithms, with a belief of building a perfect social media algorithm regulation system.","PeriodicalId":206239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management and Humanity Research","volume":"85 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Administrative Regulation of Social Media Algorithms in the European Union and America and Their Implications for China\",\"authors\":\"Ting-ting Cai\",\"doi\":\"10.22457/jmhr.v09a012355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While social media algorithms have brought positive effects, they have also brought a series of crises that have sparked public concern about algorithmic technology. In response, many countries have adopted a series of regulations on platform algorithms. The EU mainly adopts a collaborative regulatory model between administrative agencies and private institutions, emphasizing both ex-ante and ex-post regulation of algorithms, and further reinforcing the obligations and responsibilities of social media platforms, as well as adopting focused regulation on large social media platforms. The U.S. mainly focuses on external accountability, industry self-regulation, and the protection of freedom of expression and democratic politics. By analyzing the dynamics and practices of administrative regulation of social media algorithms in the EU and the U.S., it is suggested that China should: build a multiple regulation model, realize the substantial participation of other subjects, explore the hierarchical and categorical regulation of social media platforms, strengthen the construction of anti-monopoly for large social media platforms, and enhance the whole process regulation of social media algorithms, with a belief of building a perfect social media algorithm regulation system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management and Humanity Research\",\"volume\":\"85 6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management and Humanity Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22457/jmhr.v09a012355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management and Humanity Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22457/jmhr.v09a012355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体算法在带来积极影响的同时,也带来了一系列危机,引发了公众对算法技术的担忧。对此,许多国家对平台算法采取了一系列规定。欧盟主要采取行政机构和民间机构的协同监管模式,强调算法的事前和事后监管,并进一步强化社交媒体平台的义务和责任,对大型社交媒体平台采取集中监管。美国主要关注外部问责制、行业自律、保护言论自由和民主政治。通过分析欧盟和美国社交媒体算法行政监管的动态和实践,建议中国应该:构建多元监管模式,实现其他主体的实质性参与,探索社交媒体平台的分层分类监管,加强大型社交媒体平台的反垄断建设,加强社交媒体算法的全过程监管,以构建完善的社交媒体算法监管体系为信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Administrative Regulation of Social Media Algorithms in the European Union and America and Their Implications for China
While social media algorithms have brought positive effects, they have also brought a series of crises that have sparked public concern about algorithmic technology. In response, many countries have adopted a series of regulations on platform algorithms. The EU mainly adopts a collaborative regulatory model between administrative agencies and private institutions, emphasizing both ex-ante and ex-post regulation of algorithms, and further reinforcing the obligations and responsibilities of social media platforms, as well as adopting focused regulation on large social media platforms. The U.S. mainly focuses on external accountability, industry self-regulation, and the protection of freedom of expression and democratic politics. By analyzing the dynamics and practices of administrative regulation of social media algorithms in the EU and the U.S., it is suggested that China should: build a multiple regulation model, realize the substantial participation of other subjects, explore the hierarchical and categorical regulation of social media platforms, strengthen the construction of anti-monopoly for large social media platforms, and enhance the whole process regulation of social media algorithms, with a belief of building a perfect social media algorithm regulation system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信