政策协调的正式模型

C. Basile, A. Lioy, Christian Pitscheider, Shilong Zhao
{"title":"政策协调的正式模型","authors":"C. Basile, A. Lioy, Christian Pitscheider, Shilong Zhao","doi":"10.1109/PDP.2015.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a novel approach to perform the reconciliation of security policies by means of user-defined reconciliation strategies. The proposed policy reconciliation model allows several degree of freedom when specifying reconciliation strategies, which can be based not only on rule actions, like most of the works in literature, but also on other rule data (e.g., the conditions) and other external data (e.g., rule priorities, policy priorities). Additionally, it can be applied to reconcile policies at runtime and off-line, that is, it allows the generation of a reconciled policy. Moreover, the reconciliation process generates a detailed report on all the decision taken. Given its expressiveness, the approach can be also applied to simplify the policy specification process. The model has been validated against a practical example, the definition of the application layer filtering policy in a corporate scenario, and its performance has been tested with synthetic policies. Both validation and performance analysis gave encouraging results.","PeriodicalId":285111,"journal":{"name":"2015 23rd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Formal Model of Policy Reconciliation\",\"authors\":\"C. Basile, A. Lioy, Christian Pitscheider, Shilong Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PDP.2015.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a novel approach to perform the reconciliation of security policies by means of user-defined reconciliation strategies. The proposed policy reconciliation model allows several degree of freedom when specifying reconciliation strategies, which can be based not only on rule actions, like most of the works in literature, but also on other rule data (e.g., the conditions) and other external data (e.g., rule priorities, policy priorities). Additionally, it can be applied to reconcile policies at runtime and off-line, that is, it allows the generation of a reconciled policy. Moreover, the reconciliation process generates a detailed report on all the decision taken. Given its expressiveness, the approach can be also applied to simplify the policy specification process. The model has been validated against a practical example, the definition of the application layer filtering policy in a corporate scenario, and its performance has been tested with synthetic policies. Both validation and performance analysis gave encouraging results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 23rd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 23rd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP.2015.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 23rd Euromicro International Conference on Parallel, Distributed, and Network-Based Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDP.2015.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文提出了一种利用用户自定义协调策略实现安全策略协调的新方法。在指定协调策略时,建议的策略协调模型允许多个自由度,这些策略不仅可以基于规则操作,就像文献中的大多数作品一样,还可以基于其他规则数据(例如,条件)和其他外部数据(例如,规则优先级,策略优先级)。此外,它可以应用于在运行时和离线时协调策略,也就是说,它允许生成协调的策略。此外,核对过程产生一份关于所作出的所有决定的详细报告。考虑到其表达性,该方法还可以用于简化策略规范过程。该模型已通过一个实际示例(企业场景中应用层过滤策略的定义)进行了验证,并使用综合策略测试了其性能。验证和性能分析都给出了令人鼓舞的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Formal Model of Policy Reconciliation
This paper proposes a novel approach to perform the reconciliation of security policies by means of user-defined reconciliation strategies. The proposed policy reconciliation model allows several degree of freedom when specifying reconciliation strategies, which can be based not only on rule actions, like most of the works in literature, but also on other rule data (e.g., the conditions) and other external data (e.g., rule priorities, policy priorities). Additionally, it can be applied to reconcile policies at runtime and off-line, that is, it allows the generation of a reconciled policy. Moreover, the reconciliation process generates a detailed report on all the decision taken. Given its expressiveness, the approach can be also applied to simplify the policy specification process. The model has been validated against a practical example, the definition of the application layer filtering policy in a corporate scenario, and its performance has been tested with synthetic policies. Both validation and performance analysis gave encouraging results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信