企业社会责任与消费者反应:一个实验

Adriana C. Ribeiro, Margarida Catalão‐Lopes, A. S. Costa
{"title":"企业社会责任与消费者反应:一个实验","authors":"Adriana C. Ribeiro, Margarida Catalão‐Lopes, A. S. Costa","doi":"10.30564/jsbe.v5i3.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Companies differ in their motivation to corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices, with some companies taking a genuine, altruistic approach and others preferring an opportunistic approach (and attempting to mimic the former). If consumers can distinguish them, they will eventually reward the altruistic (being willing to pay more) and penalize the opportunistic ones. This paper performs an experimental study to assess whether differences in consumers’ willingness to pay are statistically significant for different classifications of CSR activities: i) proactive or reactive, ii) environment, employees, or social, iii) involving more or less expensive products, iv) being performed by firms facing competition or not. Results show that consumers are willing to reward CSR initiatives that follow a reactive approach; consumers’ decisions are more moderate when rewarding initiatives associated with more expensive products; the rewards provided depend on the CSR dimension; a relationship between market structure and consumers’ reaction to CSR was not found.","PeriodicalId":387670,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainable Business and Economics","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers’ Reaction: An Experiment\",\"authors\":\"Adriana C. Ribeiro, Margarida Catalão‐Lopes, A. S. Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.30564/jsbe.v5i3.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Companies differ in their motivation to corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices, with some companies taking a genuine, altruistic approach and others preferring an opportunistic approach (and attempting to mimic the former). If consumers can distinguish them, they will eventually reward the altruistic (being willing to pay more) and penalize the opportunistic ones. This paper performs an experimental study to assess whether differences in consumers’ willingness to pay are statistically significant for different classifications of CSR activities: i) proactive or reactive, ii) environment, employees, or social, iii) involving more or less expensive products, iv) being performed by firms facing competition or not. Results show that consumers are willing to reward CSR initiatives that follow a reactive approach; consumers’ decisions are more moderate when rewarding initiatives associated with more expensive products; the rewards provided depend on the CSR dimension; a relationship between market structure and consumers’ reaction to CSR was not found.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sustainable Business and Economics\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sustainable Business and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30564/jsbe.v5i3.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainable Business and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30564/jsbe.v5i3.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

企业社会责任(CSR)实践的动机各不相同,一些公司采取真诚的、利他的方式,而另一些公司则倾向于机会主义的方式(并试图模仿前者)。如果消费者能够区分他们,他们最终会奖励利他主义者(愿意花更多的钱),惩罚机会主义者。本文进行了一项实验研究,以评估消费者支付意愿的差异在不同类别的企业社会责任活动中是否具有统计学意义:i)主动或被动,ii)环境,员工或社会,iii)涉及更多或更便宜的产品,iv)是否由面临竞争的企业执行。结果表明,消费者愿意奖励采取被动方法的企业社会责任举措;当奖励与更昂贵的产品相关的举措时,消费者的决定更为温和;所提供的奖励取决于企业社会责任维度;市场结构与消费者对企业社会责任的反应之间没有关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumers’ Reaction: An Experiment
Companies differ in their motivation to corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices, with some companies taking a genuine, altruistic approach and others preferring an opportunistic approach (and attempting to mimic the former). If consumers can distinguish them, they will eventually reward the altruistic (being willing to pay more) and penalize the opportunistic ones. This paper performs an experimental study to assess whether differences in consumers’ willingness to pay are statistically significant for different classifications of CSR activities: i) proactive or reactive, ii) environment, employees, or social, iii) involving more or less expensive products, iv) being performed by firms facing competition or not. Results show that consumers are willing to reward CSR initiatives that follow a reactive approach; consumers’ decisions are more moderate when rewarding initiatives associated with more expensive products; the rewards provided depend on the CSR dimension; a relationship between market structure and consumers’ reaction to CSR was not found.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信