多议题协商的元策略

Safeyah Tawil, Khalid Mansour, Yaser A. Al-Lahham
{"title":"多议题协商的元策略","authors":"Safeyah Tawil, Khalid Mansour, Yaser A. Al-Lahham","doi":"10.1109/ACIT47987.2019.8991030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated negotiation is a process where multiple software agents interact with each other over certain matters through making offers and counteroffers. This paper considers a buyer agent negotiating with a seller agent over multiple issues. A meta-negotiation strategy is proposed to improve the negotiation process outcomes. The presented negotiation strategy is a cooperative negotiation one that uses both, preference-based and fuzzy similarity mechanisms. The preference-based mechanism is used for generating quantitative offers while the fuzzy similarity is used for in the process of generating qualitative offers. The preference-based mechanism considers the preferences of the opponent when making offers; the agent makes more concessions on the negotiation issues that are believed to be more preferred to the opponent. In the fuzzy similarity approach, the agent formulates an offer that is believed to be most similar to the one received from the opponent in the last negotiation round. The experimental results show that the proposed cooperative negotiation strategy outperforms the basic negotiation strategy in all the evaluation criteria such as utility, agreement rate and Nash product.","PeriodicalId":314091,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Meta-strategy for Multi-issue Negotiation\",\"authors\":\"Safeyah Tawil, Khalid Mansour, Yaser A. Al-Lahham\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACIT47987.2019.8991030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automated negotiation is a process where multiple software agents interact with each other over certain matters through making offers and counteroffers. This paper considers a buyer agent negotiating with a seller agent over multiple issues. A meta-negotiation strategy is proposed to improve the negotiation process outcomes. The presented negotiation strategy is a cooperative negotiation one that uses both, preference-based and fuzzy similarity mechanisms. The preference-based mechanism is used for generating quantitative offers while the fuzzy similarity is used for in the process of generating qualitative offers. The preference-based mechanism considers the preferences of the opponent when making offers; the agent makes more concessions on the negotiation issues that are believed to be more preferred to the opponent. In the fuzzy similarity approach, the agent formulates an offer that is believed to be most similar to the one received from the opponent in the last negotiation round. The experimental results show that the proposed cooperative negotiation strategy outperforms the basic negotiation strategy in all the evaluation criteria such as utility, agreement rate and Nash product.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT47987.2019.8991030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Arab Conference on Information Technology (ACIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT47987.2019.8991030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自动谈判是一个过程,多个软件代理通过提供和还价在某些事项上相互交互。本文考虑一个买方代理与卖方代理就多个问题进行谈判。提出了一种元协商策略来改善协商过程的结果。所提出的协商策略是一种同时使用基于偏好和模糊相似机制的合作协商策略。定量报价采用基于偏好的机制,定性报价采用模糊相似度机制。基于偏好的机制在发牌时考虑对手的偏好;代理商在谈判问题上做出更多让步,被认为对对手更有利。在模糊相似法中,agent制定一个被认为与对手在最后一轮谈判中收到的报价最相似的报价。实验结果表明,所提出的合作协商策略在效用、协议率和纳什产品等评价指标上均优于基本协商策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Meta-strategy for Multi-issue Negotiation
Automated negotiation is a process where multiple software agents interact with each other over certain matters through making offers and counteroffers. This paper considers a buyer agent negotiating with a seller agent over multiple issues. A meta-negotiation strategy is proposed to improve the negotiation process outcomes. The presented negotiation strategy is a cooperative negotiation one that uses both, preference-based and fuzzy similarity mechanisms. The preference-based mechanism is used for generating quantitative offers while the fuzzy similarity is used for in the process of generating qualitative offers. The preference-based mechanism considers the preferences of the opponent when making offers; the agent makes more concessions on the negotiation issues that are believed to be more preferred to the opponent. In the fuzzy similarity approach, the agent formulates an offer that is believed to be most similar to the one received from the opponent in the last negotiation round. The experimental results show that the proposed cooperative negotiation strategy outperforms the basic negotiation strategy in all the evaluation criteria such as utility, agreement rate and Nash product.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信