C

Alexandra Uma, Dmitry Sityaev
{"title":"C","authors":"Alexandra Uma, Dmitry Sityaev","doi":"10.1515/9783112530603-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides results of evaluating some text summarisation techniques for the purpose of producing call summaries for contact centre solutions. We specifically focus on extractive summarisation methods, as they do not require any labelled data and are fairly quick and easy to implement for production use. We experimentally compare several such methods by using them to produce summaries of calls, and evaluating these summaries objectively (using ROUGE-L) and subjectively (by aggregating the judgements of several annotators). We found that TopicSum and Lead-N outperform the other summarisation methods, whilst BERTSum received comparatively lower scores in both subjective and objective evaluations. The results demonstrate that even such simple heuristics-based methods like Lead-N can produce meaningful and useful summaries of call centre dialogues.","PeriodicalId":341583,"journal":{"name":"Entomologisches Wörterbuch mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der morphologischen Terminologie","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1955-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"C\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Uma, Dmitry Sityaev\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783112530603-008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides results of evaluating some text summarisation techniques for the purpose of producing call summaries for contact centre solutions. We specifically focus on extractive summarisation methods, as they do not require any labelled data and are fairly quick and easy to implement for production use. We experimentally compare several such methods by using them to produce summaries of calls, and evaluating these summaries objectively (using ROUGE-L) and subjectively (by aggregating the judgements of several annotators). We found that TopicSum and Lead-N outperform the other summarisation methods, whilst BERTSum received comparatively lower scores in both subjective and objective evaluations. The results demonstrate that even such simple heuristics-based methods like Lead-N can produce meaningful and useful summaries of call centre dialogues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":341583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Entomologisches Wörterbuch mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der morphologischen Terminologie\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1955-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Entomologisches Wörterbuch mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der morphologischen Terminologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112530603-008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Entomologisches Wörterbuch mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der morphologischen Terminologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112530603-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提供了评估一些文本摘要技术的结果,目的是为联络中心解决方案生产呼叫摘要。我们特别关注提取摘要方法,因为它们不需要任何标记数据,并且在生产使用中相当快速和容易实现。我们通过实验比较了几种这样的方法,使用它们来生成呼叫摘要,并客观地(使用ROUGE-L)和主观地(通过汇总几个注释者的判断)评估这些摘要。我们发现TopicSum和Lead-N的总结方法优于其他方法,而BERTSum在主观和客观评价中得分相对较低。结果表明,即使是像Lead-N这样简单的基于启发式的方法,也可以产生有意义和有用的呼叫中心对话摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
C
This paper provides results of evaluating some text summarisation techniques for the purpose of producing call summaries for contact centre solutions. We specifically focus on extractive summarisation methods, as they do not require any labelled data and are fairly quick and easy to implement for production use. We experimentally compare several such methods by using them to produce summaries of calls, and evaluating these summaries objectively (using ROUGE-L) and subjectively (by aggregating the judgements of several annotators). We found that TopicSum and Lead-N outperform the other summarisation methods, whilst BERTSum received comparatively lower scores in both subjective and objective evaluations. The results demonstrate that even such simple heuristics-based methods like Lead-N can produce meaningful and useful summaries of call centre dialogues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信