双夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术(TCLC)与常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)优势的比较研究

Anshuk Attri, Parul Sharma, UK Chandel, Bhavash Devkaran, A. Kaundal, K. Syal
{"title":"双夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术(TCLC)与常规腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)优势的比较研究","authors":"Anshuk Attri, Parul Sharma, UK Chandel, Bhavash Devkaran, A. Kaundal, K. Syal","doi":"10.47310/iarjs.2022.v02i02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the most commonly done, minimally invasive surgical procedure. Advanced energy sources, such as the harmonic scalpel, though expensive, may provide the advantage of shorter operating time by reducing smoke, bloodless dissection in the GB bed, lower risk of bleeding from the cystic artery due to secure vessel sealing, and avoiding the use of a larger number of titanium clips. Thus, a study was undertaken to compare the advantages of Two Clips Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (TCLC) over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Material and Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted in the Department of Surgery IGMC, Shimla over a period of 1 year starting from 1st july 2019 to 30th june 2020. In this study 100 consecutive patients of symptomatic cholelithiasis confirmed by USG reporting were participated and randomized into 2 groups of 50 each. Group 1 patients underwent CLC and Group 2 patients underwent TCLC. Outcomes were measured in terms of operative time, intra operative stone spillage, intra operative blood loss, amount of CO2 used , post operative pain , conversion into open cholecystectomy and post operative complications. Results: In the present study among 100 patients, 19 were males and 81 were females. Among them,5 males and 45 females underwent CLC using electrocautery while 14 males and 36 females underwent TCLC.Mean age of males were 47.60 ± 3.36 years and females were 45.20 ± 15.82 years in CLC group and mean age of males were 45.36 ± 14.53 and females were 45.25 ± 15.97 in TCLC group. Present study showed that there was significant less Operative Time, Less Mean CO2 used, less Approx. Blood Loss, less Average pain score at 6 and 24 hours, less Average Length of hospital stay, less Intra Op. Stone spillage, less Use of Drain and Post op. Complications in TCLC as compared to CLC but there was no significant difference in Conversion to Open Cholecystectomy in both groups. Conclusion: Study concluded that TCLC had advantage over CLC in terms of operative time ,intra operative stone spillage , intra operative blood loss , amount of CO2 used , post operative pain and post operative complications","PeriodicalId":299013,"journal":{"name":"International Academic Research Journal of Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advantages of Two Clips Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (TCLC) and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC): A Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Anshuk Attri, Parul Sharma, UK Chandel, Bhavash Devkaran, A. Kaundal, K. Syal\",\"doi\":\"10.47310/iarjs.2022.v02i02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the most commonly done, minimally invasive surgical procedure. Advanced energy sources, such as the harmonic scalpel, though expensive, may provide the advantage of shorter operating time by reducing smoke, bloodless dissection in the GB bed, lower risk of bleeding from the cystic artery due to secure vessel sealing, and avoiding the use of a larger number of titanium clips. Thus, a study was undertaken to compare the advantages of Two Clips Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (TCLC) over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Material and Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted in the Department of Surgery IGMC, Shimla over a period of 1 year starting from 1st july 2019 to 30th june 2020. In this study 100 consecutive patients of symptomatic cholelithiasis confirmed by USG reporting were participated and randomized into 2 groups of 50 each. Group 1 patients underwent CLC and Group 2 patients underwent TCLC. Outcomes were measured in terms of operative time, intra operative stone spillage, intra operative blood loss, amount of CO2 used , post operative pain , conversion into open cholecystectomy and post operative complications. Results: In the present study among 100 patients, 19 were males and 81 were females. Among them,5 males and 45 females underwent CLC using electrocautery while 14 males and 36 females underwent TCLC.Mean age of males were 47.60 ± 3.36 years and females were 45.20 ± 15.82 years in CLC group and mean age of males were 45.36 ± 14.53 and females were 45.25 ± 15.97 in TCLC group. Present study showed that there was significant less Operative Time, Less Mean CO2 used, less Approx. Blood Loss, less Average pain score at 6 and 24 hours, less Average Length of hospital stay, less Intra Op. Stone spillage, less Use of Drain and Post op. Complications in TCLC as compared to CLC but there was no significant difference in Conversion to Open Cholecystectomy in both groups. Conclusion: Study concluded that TCLC had advantage over CLC in terms of operative time ,intra operative stone spillage , intra operative blood loss , amount of CO2 used , post operative pain and post operative complications\",\"PeriodicalId\":299013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Academic Research Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Academic Research Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjs.2022.v02i02.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Academic Research Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47310/iarjs.2022.v02i02.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是最常用的微创手术。先进的能源,如谐波手术刀,虽然价格昂贵,但可以减少烟雾,在GB床上无血剥离,由于血管密封安全,降低囊性动脉出血的风险,并避免使用大量钛夹,从而缩短手术时间。因此,我们进行了一项研究来比较双夹腹腔镜胆囊切除术(TCLC)与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术(CLC)的优势。材料和方法:本前瞻性随机研究在西姆拉IGMC外科进行,为期1年,从2019年7月1日至2020年6月30日。本研究连续100例经USG报告确诊的症状性胆石症患者,随机分为两组,每组50例。1组患者行小细胞肺癌,2组患者行TCLC。观察手术时间、术中结石溢漏、术中出血量、CO2用量、术后疼痛、转开腹胆囊切除术及术后并发症。结果:100例患者中,男性19例,女性81例。其中男5例,女45例,男14例,女36例。CLC组患者的平均年龄男性为47.60±3.36岁,女性为45.20±15.82岁;TCLC组患者的平均年龄男性为45.36±14.53岁,女性为45.25±15.97岁。目前的研究表明,手术时间明显缩短,平均二氧化碳用量减少,约。与小细胞肺癌相比,TCLC的失血量、6小时和24小时的平均疼痛评分更低、平均住院时间更短、术中结石溢漏更少、使用引流管和术后并发症更少,但两组在转开腹胆囊切除术方面无显著差异。结论:TCLC在手术时间、术中结石溢漏、术中出血量、CO2用量、术后疼痛、术后并发症等方面优于CLC
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advantages of Two Clips Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (TCLC) and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC): A Comparative Study
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the most commonly done, minimally invasive surgical procedure. Advanced energy sources, such as the harmonic scalpel, though expensive, may provide the advantage of shorter operating time by reducing smoke, bloodless dissection in the GB bed, lower risk of bleeding from the cystic artery due to secure vessel sealing, and avoiding the use of a larger number of titanium clips. Thus, a study was undertaken to compare the advantages of Two Clips Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (TCLC) over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). Material and Methods: This prospective randomized study was conducted in the Department of Surgery IGMC, Shimla over a period of 1 year starting from 1st july 2019 to 30th june 2020. In this study 100 consecutive patients of symptomatic cholelithiasis confirmed by USG reporting were participated and randomized into 2 groups of 50 each. Group 1 patients underwent CLC and Group 2 patients underwent TCLC. Outcomes were measured in terms of operative time, intra operative stone spillage, intra operative blood loss, amount of CO2 used , post operative pain , conversion into open cholecystectomy and post operative complications. Results: In the present study among 100 patients, 19 were males and 81 were females. Among them,5 males and 45 females underwent CLC using electrocautery while 14 males and 36 females underwent TCLC.Mean age of males were 47.60 ± 3.36 years and females were 45.20 ± 15.82 years in CLC group and mean age of males were 45.36 ± 14.53 and females were 45.25 ± 15.97 in TCLC group. Present study showed that there was significant less Operative Time, Less Mean CO2 used, less Approx. Blood Loss, less Average pain score at 6 and 24 hours, less Average Length of hospital stay, less Intra Op. Stone spillage, less Use of Drain and Post op. Complications in TCLC as compared to CLC but there was no significant difference in Conversion to Open Cholecystectomy in both groups. Conclusion: Study concluded that TCLC had advantage over CLC in terms of operative time ,intra operative stone spillage , intra operative blood loss , amount of CO2 used , post operative pain and post operative complications
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信