Yavuz Birinci, Hakan Özerol, Yavuz Selim Divriklioğlu, Asım Enes Özbek, E. Çelik, S. Yılmaz, H. C. Halhalli
{"title":"牙龈弹性布基与Macintosh喉镜在院前儿童气道管理中的比较一项随机、前瞻性研究","authors":"Yavuz Birinci, Hakan Özerol, Yavuz Selim Divriklioğlu, Asım Enes Özbek, E. Çelik, S. Yılmaz, H. C. Halhalli","doi":"10.4274/globecc.galenos..2022.65375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) in children requires good techniques and experience. Gum elastic bougie (GEB) is a practical, inexpensive, easy-to-use airway method in the adult airway. Through GEB, ETI is a method that can be learned after a short training. We evaluated the effectiveness of this method, which has not yet been validated in pediatric patients in prehospital pediatric airway applications. Materials and Methods: This study was designed as a study simulating the prehospital period with a mankin. Practitioners were asked to perform intubation by conventional intubation or GEB. This study was conducted with 48 emergency medical technicians and paramedics. Four (8.3%) of the practitioners had experience using GEB. In terms of first-pass success, no difference was found between ETI via GEB and Macintosh blade conventional ETI [91.7% (44/48), 93.8% (45/48), respectively, p=1.000]. Use of GEB increased ETI time [28.6±6.0 sec vs. 17.1±4.0 sec, mean df: 11.3 sec (95% CI: 9.7-12.8), p<0.001]. While 87.6% of the practitioners evaluated the use of GEB as very easy and easy, 83.3% of the practitioners evaluated the traditional method as very easy and easy (p=0.914). Conclusion: GEB does not make any difference in pediatric airway management in terms of first-pass success. However, the use of GEB in terms of ETI durations increases the duration of ETI. Besides, the use of GEB is seen as a method that can be applied more efficiently, even in inexperienced groups.","PeriodicalId":309908,"journal":{"name":"Global Emergency and Critical Care","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Gum Elastic Bougie and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Pre-hospital Pediatric Airway Management; A Randomized, Prospective Study\",\"authors\":\"Yavuz Birinci, Hakan Özerol, Yavuz Selim Divriklioğlu, Asım Enes Özbek, E. Çelik, S. Yılmaz, H. C. Halhalli\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/globecc.galenos..2022.65375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) in children requires good techniques and experience. Gum elastic bougie (GEB) is a practical, inexpensive, easy-to-use airway method in the adult airway. Through GEB, ETI is a method that can be learned after a short training. We evaluated the effectiveness of this method, which has not yet been validated in pediatric patients in prehospital pediatric airway applications. Materials and Methods: This study was designed as a study simulating the prehospital period with a mankin. Practitioners were asked to perform intubation by conventional intubation or GEB. This study was conducted with 48 emergency medical technicians and paramedics. Four (8.3%) of the practitioners had experience using GEB. In terms of first-pass success, no difference was found between ETI via GEB and Macintosh blade conventional ETI [91.7% (44/48), 93.8% (45/48), respectively, p=1.000]. Use of GEB increased ETI time [28.6±6.0 sec vs. 17.1±4.0 sec, mean df: 11.3 sec (95% CI: 9.7-12.8), p<0.001]. While 87.6% of the practitioners evaluated the use of GEB as very easy and easy, 83.3% of the practitioners evaluated the traditional method as very easy and easy (p=0.914). Conclusion: GEB does not make any difference in pediatric airway management in terms of first-pass success. However, the use of GEB in terms of ETI durations increases the duration of ETI. Besides, the use of GEB is seen as a method that can be applied more efficiently, even in inexperienced groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Emergency and Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Emergency and Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/globecc.galenos..2022.65375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Emergency and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/globecc.galenos..2022.65375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Gum Elastic Bougie and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Pre-hospital Pediatric Airway Management; A Randomized, Prospective Study
Objective: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) in children requires good techniques and experience. Gum elastic bougie (GEB) is a practical, inexpensive, easy-to-use airway method in the adult airway. Through GEB, ETI is a method that can be learned after a short training. We evaluated the effectiveness of this method, which has not yet been validated in pediatric patients in prehospital pediatric airway applications. Materials and Methods: This study was designed as a study simulating the prehospital period with a mankin. Practitioners were asked to perform intubation by conventional intubation or GEB. This study was conducted with 48 emergency medical technicians and paramedics. Four (8.3%) of the practitioners had experience using GEB. In terms of first-pass success, no difference was found between ETI via GEB and Macintosh blade conventional ETI [91.7% (44/48), 93.8% (45/48), respectively, p=1.000]. Use of GEB increased ETI time [28.6±6.0 sec vs. 17.1±4.0 sec, mean df: 11.3 sec (95% CI: 9.7-12.8), p<0.001]. While 87.6% of the practitioners evaluated the use of GEB as very easy and easy, 83.3% of the practitioners evaluated the traditional method as very easy and easy (p=0.914). Conclusion: GEB does not make any difference in pediatric airway management in terms of first-pass success. However, the use of GEB in terms of ETI durations increases the duration of ETI. Besides, the use of GEB is seen as a method that can be applied more efficiently, even in inexperienced groups.