移动应用中第三方用户跟踪的综合研究

F. Paci, Jacopo Pizzoli, Nicola Zannone
{"title":"移动应用中第三方用户跟踪的综合研究","authors":"F. Paci, Jacopo Pizzoli, Nicola Zannone","doi":"10.1145/3600160.3605079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Third-party tracking is becoming a prevalent practice in mobile app ecosystems. While providing benefits for app developers, this practice also introduces several privacy issues for end-users. The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the ePrivacy Directive (ePD) mandate that mobile apps must obtain user consent before sharing users’ personal data with third-party trackers. This work presents an empirical study investigating the compliance of 400 popular mobile apps (200 Android apps and their corresponding version for iOS) with the ePD and GDPR requirements on valid consent. Moreover, we determined whether these mobile apps actually enforce the consent given by users on being tracked and which are the more common third-party tracker domains contacted by the apps. The analysis shows that none of the studied apps fully comply with ePD and GDPR requirements on valid consent. The most common violations were associated with the principles of freely-given, specific, and revocable consent. Moreover, we found that almost half of the analyzed apps contact third-party tracker domains even when the user has not given their consent to be tracked.","PeriodicalId":107145,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comprehensive Study on Third-Party User Tracking in Mobile Applications\",\"authors\":\"F. Paci, Jacopo Pizzoli, Nicola Zannone\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3600160.3605079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Third-party tracking is becoming a prevalent practice in mobile app ecosystems. While providing benefits for app developers, this practice also introduces several privacy issues for end-users. The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the ePrivacy Directive (ePD) mandate that mobile apps must obtain user consent before sharing users’ personal data with third-party trackers. This work presents an empirical study investigating the compliance of 400 popular mobile apps (200 Android apps and their corresponding version for iOS) with the ePD and GDPR requirements on valid consent. Moreover, we determined whether these mobile apps actually enforce the consent given by users on being tracked and which are the more common third-party tracker domains contacted by the apps. The analysis shows that none of the studied apps fully comply with ePD and GDPR requirements on valid consent. The most common violations were associated with the principles of freely-given, specific, and revocable consent. Moreover, we found that almost half of the analyzed apps contact third-party tracker domains even when the user has not given their consent to be tracked.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3600160.3605079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3600160.3605079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

第三方跟踪正在成为移动应用生态系统中的一种普遍做法。在为应用程序开发人员提供好处的同时,这种做法也给最终用户带来了一些隐私问题。欧洲通用数据保护条例(GDPR)和电子隐私指令(ePD)规定,移动应用程序在与第三方跟踪器共享用户个人数据之前必须获得用户同意。这项工作提出了一项实证研究,调查了400个流行的移动应用程序(200个Android应用程序及其对应的iOS版本)在有效同意方面符合ePD和GDPR要求。此外,我们还确定了这些移动应用程序是否真正执行了用户对被跟踪的同意,以及应用程序更常见的第三方跟踪器域。分析表明,研究的应用程序中没有一个完全符合ePD和GDPR对有效同意的要求。最常见的违规行为与自由给予、具体和可撤销同意的原则有关。此外,我们发现,即使在用户未同意被跟踪的情况下,几乎一半的分析应用程序也会联系第三方跟踪器域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comprehensive Study on Third-Party User Tracking in Mobile Applications
Third-party tracking is becoming a prevalent practice in mobile app ecosystems. While providing benefits for app developers, this practice also introduces several privacy issues for end-users. The European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the ePrivacy Directive (ePD) mandate that mobile apps must obtain user consent before sharing users’ personal data with third-party trackers. This work presents an empirical study investigating the compliance of 400 popular mobile apps (200 Android apps and their corresponding version for iOS) with the ePD and GDPR requirements on valid consent. Moreover, we determined whether these mobile apps actually enforce the consent given by users on being tracked and which are the more common third-party tracker domains contacted by the apps. The analysis shows that none of the studied apps fully comply with ePD and GDPR requirements on valid consent. The most common violations were associated with the principles of freely-given, specific, and revocable consent. Moreover, we found that almost half of the analyzed apps contact third-party tracker domains even when the user has not given their consent to be tracked.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信