种族和瑞德西韦:纽约市一个种族和民族多样化队列的临床结果检查

Ofole Mgbako, M. Mehta, Donald E Dietz, Matthew Neidell, Simian Huang, J. Zucker, Sherif M Shoucri, C. Kubin, D. Castor
{"title":"种族和瑞德西韦:纽约市一个种族和民族多样化队列的临床结果检查","authors":"Ofole Mgbako, M. Mehta, Donald E Dietz, Matthew Neidell, Simian Huang, J. Zucker, Sherif M Shoucri, C. Kubin, D. Castor","doi":"10.18865/1653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To compare clinical characteristics and examine in-hospital length of stay (LOS) differences for COVID-19 patients who received remdesivir, by race or ethnicity.\n \n \n \n Retrospective descriptive analysis comparing cumulative LOS as a proxy of recovery time.\n \n \n \n A large academic medical center serving a minoritized community in Northern Manhattan, New York City.\n \n \n \n Inpatients (N=1024) who received remdesivir from March 30, 2020–April 20, 2021.\n \n \n \n We conducted descriptive analyses among patients who received remdesivir. Patients were described by proxies of social determinants of health (SDOH): race and ethnicity, residence, insurance coverage, and clinical characteristics. We calculated median hospital LOS as the cumulative incidence of hospitalized patients who were discharged alive, and tested differences between groups by using the Gray test. Patients who died or were discharged to hospice were censored at 29 days.\n \n \n \n The primary outcome was hospital LOS. The secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality.\n \n \n \n Median LOS was 11.9 days (95% CI, 10.8-13.2) overall, with Black patients having the shortest (10.0 days, 95% CI, 8.0-13.2) and Asian patients having the longest (16.2 days, 95% CI, 8.3-27.2) LOS. A total of 214 patients (21%) died or were discharged to hospice, ranging from 16.5% to 23.7% of patients who identified as Black and Other (multiracial, biracial, declined), respectively.\n \n \n \n COVID-19 has disproportionately burdened communities of color. We observed no difference in median LOS between racial or ethnic groups, which supports the notion that the heterogeneous effect of remdesivir in the literature may be explained in part by underrecruitment or participation of Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients in clinical trials.\n","PeriodicalId":315728,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity and Disease","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Race and Remdesivir: Examination of Clinical Outcomes in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Cohort in New York City\",\"authors\":\"Ofole Mgbako, M. Mehta, Donald E Dietz, Matthew Neidell, Simian Huang, J. Zucker, Sherif M Shoucri, C. Kubin, D. Castor\",\"doi\":\"10.18865/1653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n To compare clinical characteristics and examine in-hospital length of stay (LOS) differences for COVID-19 patients who received remdesivir, by race or ethnicity.\\n \\n \\n \\n Retrospective descriptive analysis comparing cumulative LOS as a proxy of recovery time.\\n \\n \\n \\n A large academic medical center serving a minoritized community in Northern Manhattan, New York City.\\n \\n \\n \\n Inpatients (N=1024) who received remdesivir from March 30, 2020–April 20, 2021.\\n \\n \\n \\n We conducted descriptive analyses among patients who received remdesivir. Patients were described by proxies of social determinants of health (SDOH): race and ethnicity, residence, insurance coverage, and clinical characteristics. We calculated median hospital LOS as the cumulative incidence of hospitalized patients who were discharged alive, and tested differences between groups by using the Gray test. Patients who died or were discharged to hospice were censored at 29 days.\\n \\n \\n \\n The primary outcome was hospital LOS. The secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality.\\n \\n \\n \\n Median LOS was 11.9 days (95% CI, 10.8-13.2) overall, with Black patients having the shortest (10.0 days, 95% CI, 8.0-13.2) and Asian patients having the longest (16.2 days, 95% CI, 8.3-27.2) LOS. A total of 214 patients (21%) died or were discharged to hospice, ranging from 16.5% to 23.7% of patients who identified as Black and Other (multiracial, biracial, declined), respectively.\\n \\n \\n \\n COVID-19 has disproportionately burdened communities of color. We observed no difference in median LOS between racial or ethnic groups, which supports the notion that the heterogeneous effect of remdesivir in the literature may be explained in part by underrecruitment or participation of Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients in clinical trials.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":315728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnicity and Disease\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnicity and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18865/1653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18865/1653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较接受瑞德西韦治疗的COVID-19患者的临床特征,并按种族或民族检查住院时间(LOS)差异。回顾性描述性分析比较累积LOS作为恢复时间的代理。这是一个大型学术医疗中心,服务于纽约市曼哈顿北部的一个少数族裔社区。2020年3月30日至2021年4月20日期间接受瑞德西韦治疗的住院患者(N=1024)。我们对接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者进行了描述性分析。通过健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)来描述患者:种族和民族、居住地、保险覆盖率和临床特征。我们将医院LOS的中位数计算为活着出院的住院患者的累积发生率,并使用Gray检验来检验组间的差异。死亡或出院至临终关怀的患者在29天内被审查。主要结局为医院LOS。次要终点是住院死亡率。中位生存期总体为11.9天(95% CI, 10.8-13.2),其中黑人患者生存期最短(10.0天,95% CI, 8.0-13.2),亚裔患者生存期最长(16.2天,95% CI, 8.3-27.2)。共有214名患者(21%)死亡或出院至临终关怀,其中黑人和其他(多种族,混血人种,下降)患者的比例分别为16.5%至23.7%。COVID-19给有色人种社区造成了不成比例的负担。我们观察到不同种族或民族之间的中位LOS没有差异,这支持了文献中瑞德西韦的异质效应可能部分解释为临床试验中招募不足或黑人、西班牙裔和亚洲患者参与的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Race and Remdesivir: Examination of Clinical Outcomes in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Cohort in New York City
To compare clinical characteristics and examine in-hospital length of stay (LOS) differences for COVID-19 patients who received remdesivir, by race or ethnicity. Retrospective descriptive analysis comparing cumulative LOS as a proxy of recovery time. A large academic medical center serving a minoritized community in Northern Manhattan, New York City. Inpatients (N=1024) who received remdesivir from March 30, 2020–April 20, 2021. We conducted descriptive analyses among patients who received remdesivir. Patients were described by proxies of social determinants of health (SDOH): race and ethnicity, residence, insurance coverage, and clinical characteristics. We calculated median hospital LOS as the cumulative incidence of hospitalized patients who were discharged alive, and tested differences between groups by using the Gray test. Patients who died or were discharged to hospice were censored at 29 days. The primary outcome was hospital LOS. The secondary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Median LOS was 11.9 days (95% CI, 10.8-13.2) overall, with Black patients having the shortest (10.0 days, 95% CI, 8.0-13.2) and Asian patients having the longest (16.2 days, 95% CI, 8.3-27.2) LOS. A total of 214 patients (21%) died or were discharged to hospice, ranging from 16.5% to 23.7% of patients who identified as Black and Other (multiracial, biracial, declined), respectively. COVID-19 has disproportionately burdened communities of color. We observed no difference in median LOS between racial or ethnic groups, which supports the notion that the heterogeneous effect of remdesivir in the literature may be explained in part by underrecruitment or participation of Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients in clinical trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信