导联内和导联间心电图成像的可变性

J. Stoks, B. V. Rees, S. A. Groeneveld, Diantha J. M. Schipaanboord, L. Blom, R. Hassink, M. Cluitmans, R. Peeters, P. Volders
{"title":"导联内和导联间心电图成像的可变性","authors":"J. Stoks, B. V. Rees, S. A. Groeneveld, Diantha J. M. Schipaanboord, L. Blom, R. Hassink, M. Cluitmans, R. Peeters, P. Volders","doi":"10.22489/CinC.2020.097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The variability of the inverse solution provided by electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) is largely unknown when comparing different leadsets or (similar) beats. In four patients, we compared activation times (ATs), recovery times (RTs), and correlation coefficients during QRS complex and STT segment between: 1) consecutive sinus beats within one leadset, and 2) multiple beats for two leadsets. Furthermore, reasons behind differences in RT were investigated. Zero-th order Tikhonov regularization was used to reconstruct ventricular epicardial potentials. A spatiotemporal estimation method was then used to determine the ATs and RTs from the reconstructed epicardial electrograms. Inter-leadset differences were generally low for ATs, but exceeded intra-leadset beat-to-beat variations. RTs, however, showed larger variation independent of leadset. Differences in RTs between beats or leadsets could partially be explained by low T-wave amplitudes and high levels of noise, which suggests that RT determination may require more advanced methods in these cases. These findings increase our understanding of the consequences of electrode placement for the inverse solution, as well as our understanding of the complexities of recovery time estimation in ECGI.","PeriodicalId":407282,"journal":{"name":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability of Electrocardiographic Imaging Within and Between Leadsets\",\"authors\":\"J. Stoks, B. V. Rees, S. A. Groeneveld, Diantha J. M. Schipaanboord, L. Blom, R. Hassink, M. Cluitmans, R. Peeters, P. Volders\",\"doi\":\"10.22489/CinC.2020.097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The variability of the inverse solution provided by electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) is largely unknown when comparing different leadsets or (similar) beats. In four patients, we compared activation times (ATs), recovery times (RTs), and correlation coefficients during QRS complex and STT segment between: 1) consecutive sinus beats within one leadset, and 2) multiple beats for two leadsets. Furthermore, reasons behind differences in RT were investigated. Zero-th order Tikhonov regularization was used to reconstruct ventricular epicardial potentials. A spatiotemporal estimation method was then used to determine the ATs and RTs from the reconstructed epicardial electrograms. Inter-leadset differences were generally low for ATs, but exceeded intra-leadset beat-to-beat variations. RTs, however, showed larger variation independent of leadset. Differences in RTs between beats or leadsets could partially be explained by low T-wave amplitudes and high levels of noise, which suggests that RT determination may require more advanced methods in these cases. These findings increase our understanding of the consequences of electrode placement for the inverse solution, as well as our understanding of the complexities of recovery time estimation in ECGI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Computing in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Computing in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Computing in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22489/CinC.2020.097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在比较不同导联组或(相似)心跳时,心电图成像(ECGI)提供的逆溶液的可变性在很大程度上是未知的。在4例患者中,我们比较了激活时间(ATs)、恢复时间(RTs)以及QRS复合段和STT段的相关系数:1)一个导联组内连续窦性搏动,2)两个导联组内多次搏动。此外,研究了RT差异背后的原因。采用零阶Tikhonov正则化方法重建心外膜心室电位。然后采用时空估计方法从重建的心外膜电图中确定ATs和RTs。导联组之间的差异通常较低,但超过了导联组内部的心跳变化。然而,RTs在独立于导联集的情况下表现出更大的变化。节拍或引线组之间的RT差异可以部分解释为低t波振幅和高水平的噪声,这表明在这些情况下,RT测定可能需要更先进的方法。这些发现增加了我们对电极放置对反溶液的影响的理解,以及我们对ECGI中恢复时间估计复杂性的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variability of Electrocardiographic Imaging Within and Between Leadsets
The variability of the inverse solution provided by electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) is largely unknown when comparing different leadsets or (similar) beats. In four patients, we compared activation times (ATs), recovery times (RTs), and correlation coefficients during QRS complex and STT segment between: 1) consecutive sinus beats within one leadset, and 2) multiple beats for two leadsets. Furthermore, reasons behind differences in RT were investigated. Zero-th order Tikhonov regularization was used to reconstruct ventricular epicardial potentials. A spatiotemporal estimation method was then used to determine the ATs and RTs from the reconstructed epicardial electrograms. Inter-leadset differences were generally low for ATs, but exceeded intra-leadset beat-to-beat variations. RTs, however, showed larger variation independent of leadset. Differences in RTs between beats or leadsets could partially be explained by low T-wave amplitudes and high levels of noise, which suggests that RT determination may require more advanced methods in these cases. These findings increase our understanding of the consequences of electrode placement for the inverse solution, as well as our understanding of the complexities of recovery time estimation in ECGI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信