基于ISR引文的专利质量测度:指标构建及其在中国企业层面数据中的应用

P. Boeing, Elisabeth F. Mueller
{"title":"基于ISR引文的专利质量测度:指标构建及其在中国企业层面数据中的应用","authors":"P. Boeing, Elisabeth F. Mueller","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3136171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering China’s policy-driven patent expansion, we validate domestic citations in comparison to foreign ones, which are exogenous to China’s policy, as economic indicators. We derive internationally comparable citation data from international search reports. Whereas foreign citations show that Chinese PCT applications reach only a third of the non-Chinese quality benchmark, the extension towards domestic and self citations suggests an increasing quality level that is closer to the benchmark. We investigate these differences based on firm-level regressions and find that only foreign citations, but not domestic and self citations, have a significant and positive relation to R&D stocks. As Chinese citations appear to suffer from an upward bias, we confirm that indicators fail as reliable measures if they become the target of policy. Taking Germany as a counterexample, we show that domestic and self citations may be used as quality measures if policy distortion is not a concern.","PeriodicalId":255007,"journal":{"name":"SRPN: Patents (Topic)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Patent Quality Based on ISR Citations: Development of Indices and Application to Chinese Firm-Level Data\",\"authors\":\"P. Boeing, Elisabeth F. Mueller\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3136171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Considering China’s policy-driven patent expansion, we validate domestic citations in comparison to foreign ones, which are exogenous to China’s policy, as economic indicators. We derive internationally comparable citation data from international search reports. Whereas foreign citations show that Chinese PCT applications reach only a third of the non-Chinese quality benchmark, the extension towards domestic and self citations suggests an increasing quality level that is closer to the benchmark. We investigate these differences based on firm-level regressions and find that only foreign citations, but not domestic and self citations, have a significant and positive relation to R&D stocks. As Chinese citations appear to suffer from an upward bias, we confirm that indicators fail as reliable measures if they become the target of policy. Taking Germany as a counterexample, we show that domestic and self citations may be used as quality measures if policy distortion is not a concern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SRPN: Patents (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SRPN: Patents (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3136171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SRPN: Patents (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3136171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

考虑到中国政策驱动的专利扩张,我们验证了国内引用与国外引用的比较,这是中国政策的外生因素,作为经济指标。我们从国际搜索报告中获得国际可比的引文数据。国外引用表明,中国的PCT申请仅达到非中国质量基准的三分之一,而国内引用和自我引用的扩展表明,中国的PCT申请质量水平越来越接近基准。我们基于企业层面的回归研究了这些差异,发现只有国外引用与研发股票有显著的正相关关系,而国内引用和自我引用与研发股票没有显著的正相关关系。由于中国的引用似乎存在向上的偏见,我们证实,如果这些指标成为政策目标,它们就不能作为可靠的衡量标准。以德国为例,我们表明,如果不担心政策扭曲,国内和自我引用可以作为质量衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Patent Quality Based on ISR Citations: Development of Indices and Application to Chinese Firm-Level Data
Considering China’s policy-driven patent expansion, we validate domestic citations in comparison to foreign ones, which are exogenous to China’s policy, as economic indicators. We derive internationally comparable citation data from international search reports. Whereas foreign citations show that Chinese PCT applications reach only a third of the non-Chinese quality benchmark, the extension towards domestic and self citations suggests an increasing quality level that is closer to the benchmark. We investigate these differences based on firm-level regressions and find that only foreign citations, but not domestic and self citations, have a significant and positive relation to R&D stocks. As Chinese citations appear to suffer from an upward bias, we confirm that indicators fail as reliable measures if they become the target of policy. Taking Germany as a counterexample, we show that domestic and self citations may be used as quality measures if policy distortion is not a concern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信