改善Gleason评分升级的预测:前列腺特异性抗原密度的作用

Q4 Medicine
R. Ugalde-Resano, J.O. Herrera-Cáceres, C.I. Villeda-Sandoval, A. Cayetano-Alcaraz, B.E. Montaño-Roca, F. Rodríguez-Covarrubias, M. Sotomayor de Zavaleta
{"title":"改善Gleason评分升级的预测:前列腺特异性抗原密度的作用","authors":"R. Ugalde-Resano,&nbsp;J.O. Herrera-Cáceres,&nbsp;C.I. Villeda-Sandoval,&nbsp;A. Cayetano-Alcaraz,&nbsp;B.E. Montaño-Roca,&nbsp;F. Rodríguez-Covarrubias,&nbsp;M. Sotomayor de Zavaleta","doi":"10.1016/j.uromx.2016.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Conservative therapies, such as active surveillance, can be appropriate treatment for low-risk prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of Gleason score (GS) upgrading in patients with a low-grade GS. We reviewed our prospectively maintained database of patients with prostate cancer that underwent radical prostatectomy within the time frame of 2004–2015. Potential predictors of upgrading in patients with GS 3<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->3 were studied. Of the 342 patients in our database, 125 had GS 3<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->3. Biopsy GS and surgical GS were identical in 71 (56.8%) patients with GS 3<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->3, whereas 54 (43.2%) patients had an upgrade. The GS was upgraded to 7 in 70% of those patients and to ≥8 in 30%. We found a statistically significant correlation between postoperative upgrade and the preoperative prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) value (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), prostate volume (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004), and patient age ≥70 years (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.011). We estimated an optimal PSAD cutoff point of 0.17<!--> <!-->ng/ml<sup>2</sup> through ROC analysis, with an AUC of 0.675 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). It is our opinion that every hospital center offering active surveillance should carry out a continuous review of upgrading and related risk factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34909,"journal":{"name":"Revista mexicana de urologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.uromx.2016.07.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving the prediction of Gleason score upgrading: The role of prostate-specific antigen density\",\"authors\":\"R. Ugalde-Resano,&nbsp;J.O. Herrera-Cáceres,&nbsp;C.I. Villeda-Sandoval,&nbsp;A. Cayetano-Alcaraz,&nbsp;B.E. Montaño-Roca,&nbsp;F. Rodríguez-Covarrubias,&nbsp;M. Sotomayor de Zavaleta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.uromx.2016.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Conservative therapies, such as active surveillance, can be appropriate treatment for low-risk prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of Gleason score (GS) upgrading in patients with a low-grade GS. We reviewed our prospectively maintained database of patients with prostate cancer that underwent radical prostatectomy within the time frame of 2004–2015. Potential predictors of upgrading in patients with GS 3<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->3 were studied. Of the 342 patients in our database, 125 had GS 3<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->3. Biopsy GS and surgical GS were identical in 71 (56.8%) patients with GS 3<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->3, whereas 54 (43.2%) patients had an upgrade. The GS was upgraded to 7 in 70% of those patients and to ≥8 in 30%. We found a statistically significant correlation between postoperative upgrade and the preoperative prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) value (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), prostate volume (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.004), and patient age ≥70 years (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.011). We estimated an optimal PSAD cutoff point of 0.17<!--> <!-->ng/ml<sup>2</sup> through ROC analysis, with an AUC of 0.675 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.001). It is our opinion that every hospital center offering active surveillance should carry out a continuous review of upgrading and related risk factors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista mexicana de urologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.uromx.2016.07.002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista mexicana de urologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007408516300465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista mexicana de urologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007408516300465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保守疗法,如主动监测,是治疗低风险前列腺癌的合适方法。本研究的目的是分析低度GS患者Gleason评分(GS)升级的频率。我们回顾了2004-2015年期间接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者的前瞻性数据库。研究了GS 3 + 3患者升级的潜在预测因素。在我们数据库中的342例患者中,125例为GS 3 + 3。活检GS和手术GS在71例(56.8%)GS 3 + 3患者中相同,而54例(43.2%)患者GS升级。在这些患者中,70%的患者的GS评分提高到7分,30%的患者的GS评分提高到≥8分。我们发现术后升级与术前前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)值有统计学意义的相关性(p <0.001)、前列腺体积(p = 0.004)和患者年龄≥70岁(p = 0.011)。通过ROC分析,我们估计最佳PSAD截断点为0.17 ng/ml2, AUC为0.675 (p = 0.001)。我们认为,每个提供主动监测的医院中心都应该对升级和相关风险因素进行持续审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving the prediction of Gleason score upgrading: The role of prostate-specific antigen density

Conservative therapies, such as active surveillance, can be appropriate treatment for low-risk prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of Gleason score (GS) upgrading in patients with a low-grade GS. We reviewed our prospectively maintained database of patients with prostate cancer that underwent radical prostatectomy within the time frame of 2004–2015. Potential predictors of upgrading in patients with GS 3 + 3 were studied. Of the 342 patients in our database, 125 had GS 3 + 3. Biopsy GS and surgical GS were identical in 71 (56.8%) patients with GS 3 + 3, whereas 54 (43.2%) patients had an upgrade. The GS was upgraded to 7 in 70% of those patients and to ≥8 in 30%. We found a statistically significant correlation between postoperative upgrade and the preoperative prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) value (p < 0.001), prostate volume (p = 0.004), and patient age ≥70 years (p = 0.011). We estimated an optimal PSAD cutoff point of 0.17 ng/ml2 through ROC analysis, with an AUC of 0.675 (p = 0.001). It is our opinion that every hospital center offering active surveillance should carry out a continuous review of upgrading and related risk factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista mexicana de urologia
Revista mexicana de urologia Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Revista Mexicana de Urología (RMU) [Mexican Journal of Urology] (ISSN: 0185-4542 / ISSN electronic: 2007-4085) is bimonthly publication that disseminates research by academicians and professionals of the international medical community interested in urological subjects, in the format of original articles, clinical cases, review articles brief communications and letters to the editor. Owing to its nature, it is publication with international scope that disseminates contributions in Spanish and English that are rigorously reviewed by peers under the double blind modality. Neither journalistic documents nor those that lack rigorous medical or scientific support are suitable for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信