{"title":"用于检索评估的动态测试集合","authors":"Ben Carterette, Ashraf Bah Rabiou, M. Zengin","doi":"10.1145/2808194.2809470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Batch evaluation with test collections of documents, search topics, and relevance judgments has been the bedrock of IR evaluation since its adoption by Salton for his experiments on vector space systems. Such test collections have limitations: they contain no user interaction data; there is typically only one query per topic; they have limited size due to the cost of constructing them. In the last 15-20 years, it has become evident that having a log of user interactions and a large space of queries is invaluable for building effective retrieval systems, but such data is generally only available to search engine companies. Thus there is a gap between what academics can study using static test collections and what industrial researchers can study using dynamic user data. In this work we propose dynamic test collections to help bridge this gap. Like traditional test collections, a dynamic test collection consists of a set of topics and relevance judgments. But instead of static one-time queries, dynamic test collections generate queries in response to the system. They can generate other actions such as clicks and time spent reading documents. Like static test collections, there is no human in the loop, but since the queries are dynamic they can generate much more data for evaluation than static test collections can. And since they can simulate user interactions across a session, they can be used for evaluating retrieval systems that make use of session history or other user information to try to improve results.","PeriodicalId":440325,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic Test Collections for Retrieval Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Ben Carterette, Ashraf Bah Rabiou, M. Zengin\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2808194.2809470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Batch evaluation with test collections of documents, search topics, and relevance judgments has been the bedrock of IR evaluation since its adoption by Salton for his experiments on vector space systems. Such test collections have limitations: they contain no user interaction data; there is typically only one query per topic; they have limited size due to the cost of constructing them. In the last 15-20 years, it has become evident that having a log of user interactions and a large space of queries is invaluable for building effective retrieval systems, but such data is generally only available to search engine companies. Thus there is a gap between what academics can study using static test collections and what industrial researchers can study using dynamic user data. In this work we propose dynamic test collections to help bridge this gap. Like traditional test collections, a dynamic test collection consists of a set of topics and relevance judgments. But instead of static one-time queries, dynamic test collections generate queries in response to the system. They can generate other actions such as clicks and time spent reading documents. Like static test collections, there is no human in the loop, but since the queries are dynamic they can generate much more data for evaluation than static test collections can. And since they can simulate user interactions across a session, they can be used for evaluating retrieval systems that make use of session history or other user information to try to improve results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2808194.2809470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on The Theory of Information Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2808194.2809470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Batch evaluation with test collections of documents, search topics, and relevance judgments has been the bedrock of IR evaluation since its adoption by Salton for his experiments on vector space systems. Such test collections have limitations: they contain no user interaction data; there is typically only one query per topic; they have limited size due to the cost of constructing them. In the last 15-20 years, it has become evident that having a log of user interactions and a large space of queries is invaluable for building effective retrieval systems, but such data is generally only available to search engine companies. Thus there is a gap between what academics can study using static test collections and what industrial researchers can study using dynamic user data. In this work we propose dynamic test collections to help bridge this gap. Like traditional test collections, a dynamic test collection consists of a set of topics and relevance judgments. But instead of static one-time queries, dynamic test collections generate queries in response to the system. They can generate other actions such as clicks and time spent reading documents. Like static test collections, there is no human in the loop, but since the queries are dynamic they can generate much more data for evaluation than static test collections can. And since they can simulate user interactions across a session, they can be used for evaluating retrieval systems that make use of session history or other user information to try to improve results.