脉冲频率解调无尖峰检测

J. Mcnames
{"title":"脉冲频率解调无尖峰检测","authors":"J. Mcnames","doi":"10.1109/CNE.2005.1419598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the primary goals in the analysis of microelectrode recordings (MER) is to estimate the time-varying component of the firing rate, also known as the process intensity. This is typically done by applying a spike detection algorithm to create a spike train and then smoothing the spike train to estimate the slowly-varying fluctuations in intensity. In noisy recordings from microelectrode arrays or low-impedance microelectrodes used in stereotactic neurosurgery, this approach is often not possible because spike detection algorithms cannot accurately discriminate action potentials from single neurons. This paper compares the performance of a traditional spike-detection approach with an optimal threshold to a power demodulation approach similar to the full-wave rectifiers that are often used for the analysis of electromyograms (EMG). The results demonstrate that, in most cases, the power demodulation approach is as accurate as an optimal threshold detector. In signals with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) less than 0.1, the power demodulation approach performs slightly better than the detection-based approach","PeriodicalId":113815,"journal":{"name":"Conference Proceedings. 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2005.","volume":"34 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulse Frequency Demodulation Without Spike Detection\",\"authors\":\"J. Mcnames\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CNE.2005.1419598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the primary goals in the analysis of microelectrode recordings (MER) is to estimate the time-varying component of the firing rate, also known as the process intensity. This is typically done by applying a spike detection algorithm to create a spike train and then smoothing the spike train to estimate the slowly-varying fluctuations in intensity. In noisy recordings from microelectrode arrays or low-impedance microelectrodes used in stereotactic neurosurgery, this approach is often not possible because spike detection algorithms cannot accurately discriminate action potentials from single neurons. This paper compares the performance of a traditional spike-detection approach with an optimal threshold to a power demodulation approach similar to the full-wave rectifiers that are often used for the analysis of electromyograms (EMG). The results demonstrate that, in most cases, the power demodulation approach is as accurate as an optimal threshold detector. In signals with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) less than 0.1, the power demodulation approach performs slightly better than the detection-based approach\",\"PeriodicalId\":113815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conference Proceedings. 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2005.\",\"volume\":\"34 3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conference Proceedings. 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CNE.2005.1419598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Proceedings. 2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CNE.2005.1419598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

微电极记录(MER)分析的主要目标之一是估计发射速率的时变成分,也称为过程强度。这通常是通过应用一个尖峰检测算法来创建一个尖峰序列,然后平滑尖峰序列来估计强度缓慢变化的波动。在立体定向神经外科中使用的微电极阵列或低阻抗微电极的噪声记录中,这种方法通常是不可能的,因为尖峰检测算法不能准确地区分单个神经元的动作电位。本文比较了具有最佳阈值的传统尖峰检测方法与功率解调方法的性能,功率解调方法类似于通常用于肌电图(EMG)分析的全波整流器。结果表明,在大多数情况下,功率解调方法与最佳阈值检测器一样精确。在信噪比小于0.1的信号中,功率解调方法的性能略好于基于检测的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulse Frequency Demodulation Without Spike Detection
One of the primary goals in the analysis of microelectrode recordings (MER) is to estimate the time-varying component of the firing rate, also known as the process intensity. This is typically done by applying a spike detection algorithm to create a spike train and then smoothing the spike train to estimate the slowly-varying fluctuations in intensity. In noisy recordings from microelectrode arrays or low-impedance microelectrodes used in stereotactic neurosurgery, this approach is often not possible because spike detection algorithms cannot accurately discriminate action potentials from single neurons. This paper compares the performance of a traditional spike-detection approach with an optimal threshold to a power demodulation approach similar to the full-wave rectifiers that are often used for the analysis of electromyograms (EMG). The results demonstrate that, in most cases, the power demodulation approach is as accurate as an optimal threshold detector. In signals with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) less than 0.1, the power demodulation approach performs slightly better than the detection-based approach
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信