Ética e estacimtica。没有共同的两极分化,也没有共同的差异——伦理与美学。不是极性,而是差异

K. Bohrer
{"title":"Ética e estacimtica。没有共同的两极分化,也没有共同的差异——伦理与美学。不是极性,而是差异","authors":"K. Bohrer","doi":"10.22456/2596-0911.120157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Este ensaio discute a tensão entre ética e estética (que corresponde à oposição da filosofia da arte e da teoria estética) com a ajuda de três pensadores, que interiorizaram a experiência romântico-moderna, sem que se tornassem suspeitos de qualquer idealismo: Kierkegaard, Musil, Adorno.Palavras-chave: Estética. Ética. Kierkegaard. Musil. Adorno. AbstractThis essay discusses the tension between Ethics and Esthetics (which corresponds to the opposition of Philosophy of Arts and Esthetic Theory) helped by three thinkers, who interiorized the modern-romantic experience, without any suspicion of any idealism: Kiierkegaard, Musil, Adorno.Keywords: Esthetics. Ethics. Kierkegaard. Musil. Adorno.","PeriodicalId":429436,"journal":{"name":"Revista PHILIA | Filosofia, Literatura & Arte","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ética e estética. Não como polaridade, mas como diferença | Ethics and aesthetics. Not as polarity, but as a difference\",\"authors\":\"K. Bohrer\",\"doi\":\"10.22456/2596-0911.120157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Este ensaio discute a tensão entre ética e estética (que corresponde à oposição da filosofia da arte e da teoria estética) com a ajuda de três pensadores, que interiorizaram a experiência romântico-moderna, sem que se tornassem suspeitos de qualquer idealismo: Kierkegaard, Musil, Adorno.Palavras-chave: Estética. Ética. Kierkegaard. Musil. Adorno. AbstractThis essay discusses the tension between Ethics and Esthetics (which corresponds to the opposition of Philosophy of Arts and Esthetic Theory) helped by three thinkers, who interiorized the modern-romantic experience, without any suspicion of any idealism: Kiierkegaard, Musil, Adorno.Keywords: Esthetics. Ethics. Kierkegaard. Musil. Adorno.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista PHILIA | Filosofia, Literatura & Arte\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista PHILIA | Filosofia, Literatura & Arte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22456/2596-0911.120157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista PHILIA | Filosofia, Literatura & Arte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22456/2596-0911.120157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文在克尔凯郭尔、穆西尔、阿多诺这三位思想家的帮助下,探讨了伦理与美学之间的紧张关系(这与艺术哲学与美学理论的对立相对应),他们内化了现代浪漫主义的经验,却没有对任何唯心主义产生怀疑。关键词:审美。伦理。(古希腊。成功。装饰。这篇文章讨论了伦理学和美学之间的紧张关系(与艺术哲学和美学理论的对立相对应),由三位思想家所支持,他们内化了现代浪漫主义的经验,没有任何唯心主义的怀疑:Kiierkegaard, Musil, Adorno。关键词:Esthetics。道德。(古希腊。成功。装饰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ética e estética. Não como polaridade, mas como diferença | Ethics and aesthetics. Not as polarity, but as a difference
Este ensaio discute a tensão entre ética e estética (que corresponde à oposição da filosofia da arte e da teoria estética) com a ajuda de três pensadores, que interiorizaram a experiência romântico-moderna, sem que se tornassem suspeitos de qualquer idealismo: Kierkegaard, Musil, Adorno.Palavras-chave: Estética. Ética. Kierkegaard. Musil. Adorno. AbstractThis essay discusses the tension between Ethics and Esthetics (which corresponds to the opposition of Philosophy of Arts and Esthetic Theory) helped by three thinkers, who interiorized the modern-romantic experience, without any suspicion of any idealism: Kiierkegaard, Musil, Adorno.Keywords: Esthetics. Ethics. Kierkegaard. Musil. Adorno.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信