咬掉你能嚼的东西?知识获取策略与吸收能力演化

Wendy Ham
{"title":"咬掉你能嚼的东西?知识获取策略与吸收能力演化","authors":"Wendy Ham","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2201058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I present a computational study to examine a common assumption in organizational learning, that an exploitative knowledge acquisition strategy will accumulate less diverse knowledge than an explorative strategy. I show that this is not always the case: When taking into account factors that influence the ease of knowledge acquisition, such as sensitivity of absorptive capacity to knowledge distance, requirement for repeated engagements with particular knowledge, and depreciation of knowledge due to forgetting, sometimes an exploitative strategy can outperform an explorative strategy both in terms of acquisition success rate and diversity of the resulting knowledge stock.","PeriodicalId":350660,"journal":{"name":"POL: Other Resource Based Strategy & Policy (Topic)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bite Off What You Can Chew? Knowledge Acquisition Strategy and the Evolution of Absorptive Capacity\",\"authors\":\"Wendy Ham\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2201058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I present a computational study to examine a common assumption in organizational learning, that an exploitative knowledge acquisition strategy will accumulate less diverse knowledge than an explorative strategy. I show that this is not always the case: When taking into account factors that influence the ease of knowledge acquisition, such as sensitivity of absorptive capacity to knowledge distance, requirement for repeated engagements with particular knowledge, and depreciation of knowledge due to forgetting, sometimes an exploitative strategy can outperform an explorative strategy both in terms of acquisition success rate and diversity of the resulting knowledge stock.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"POL: Other Resource Based Strategy & Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"POL: Other Resource Based Strategy & Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2201058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POL: Other Resource Based Strategy & Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2201058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我提出了一项计算研究来检验组织学习中的一个常见假设,即利用性知识获取策略将比探索性策略积累较少的多样化知识。我表明,情况并非总是如此:当考虑到影响知识获取难易程度的因素时,例如吸收能力对知识距离的敏感性,对特定知识的重复接触的要求,以及由于遗忘而导致的知识贬值,有时利用策略在获取成功率和由此产生的知识储备的多样性方面都优于探索策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bite Off What You Can Chew? Knowledge Acquisition Strategy and the Evolution of Absorptive Capacity
I present a computational study to examine a common assumption in organizational learning, that an exploitative knowledge acquisition strategy will accumulate less diverse knowledge than an explorative strategy. I show that this is not always the case: When taking into account factors that influence the ease of knowledge acquisition, such as sensitivity of absorptive capacity to knowledge distance, requirement for repeated engagements with particular knowledge, and depreciation of knowledge due to forgetting, sometimes an exploitative strategy can outperform an explorative strategy both in terms of acquisition success rate and diversity of the resulting knowledge stock.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信