生物原油生产微藻采收技术的选择

Abdul Rozaq Albaqi, Nugroho Dewayanto, Eko Agus Suyono, Arief Budiman
{"title":"生物原油生产微藻采收技术的选择","authors":"Abdul Rozaq Albaqi, Nugroho Dewayanto, Eko Agus Suyono, Arief Budiman","doi":"10.22146/free.v1i1.3847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy consumption of fossil fuel which keeps increasing has led to the urgency of research and development on the field  of  renewable  energy  for  the  future. Microalgae are considered to be the most promising new source of biomass compared with first and second-generation feedstocks. A great challenge is a choice of an effective approach for microalgae harvesting. Additional challenges of microalgae harvesting come from the small size of microalgae cells (3-30µm) and the similarity of the density of the microalgae cells to the growth medium. This research is aimed to determine the appropriate microalgae harvesting technology for bio-crude oil production. Several potential microalgae harvesting technologies are centrifugation, filtration, inorganic flocculation, organic flocculation, bioflocculation, electrocoagulation, and flocculation-sedimentation. The  method  used  in  this  research  is Analytic  Hierarchy  Process  (AHP). The  results  indicate  that  the parameters  taken  into  consideration  are  energy need (0.339), cost (0.214), risk of contamination (0.098), efficiency (0.133), technology availability  (0.066),  microalgae strain flexibility (0.079),  and  production time (0.071). In a case study, the pairwise comparison of seven alternatives each for the harvesting and seven criteria are compared. The best alternative that can be recommended as a microalgae harvesting technology is flocculation-sedimentation with a weight of 0.202.","PeriodicalId":120071,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Renewable Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of Microalgae Harvesting Technology for Bio-crude Oil Production\",\"authors\":\"Abdul Rozaq Albaqi, Nugroho Dewayanto, Eko Agus Suyono, Arief Budiman\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/free.v1i1.3847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Energy consumption of fossil fuel which keeps increasing has led to the urgency of research and development on the field  of  renewable  energy  for  the  future. Microalgae are considered to be the most promising new source of biomass compared with first and second-generation feedstocks. A great challenge is a choice of an effective approach for microalgae harvesting. Additional challenges of microalgae harvesting come from the small size of microalgae cells (3-30µm) and the similarity of the density of the microalgae cells to the growth medium. This research is aimed to determine the appropriate microalgae harvesting technology for bio-crude oil production. Several potential microalgae harvesting technologies are centrifugation, filtration, inorganic flocculation, organic flocculation, bioflocculation, electrocoagulation, and flocculation-sedimentation. The  method  used  in  this  research  is Analytic  Hierarchy  Process  (AHP). The  results  indicate  that  the parameters  taken  into  consideration  are  energy need (0.339), cost (0.214), risk of contamination (0.098), efficiency (0.133), technology availability  (0.066),  microalgae strain flexibility (0.079),  and  production time (0.071). In a case study, the pairwise comparison of seven alternatives each for the harvesting and seven criteria are compared. The best alternative that can be recommended as a microalgae harvesting technology is flocculation-sedimentation with a weight of 0.202.\",\"PeriodicalId\":120071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Renewable Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Renewable Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/free.v1i1.3847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Renewable Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/free.v1i1.3847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

化石燃料的能源消耗不断增加,使得未来可再生能源领域的研究和开发迫在眉睫。与第一代和第二代原料相比,微藻被认为是最有前途的生物质新来源。选择一种有效的微藻收获方法是一个巨大的挑战。微藻收获的其他挑战来自于微藻细胞的小尺寸(3-30µm)和微藻细胞与生长培养基的密度相似。本研究旨在确定适合生物原油生产的微藻收获技术。几种潜在的微藻收集技术有离心、过滤、无机絮凝、有机絮凝、生物絮凝、电絮凝和絮凝沉淀。本研究使用的方法是层次分析法(AHP)。结果表明:考虑的参数为能量需求(0.339)、成本(0.214)、污染风险(0.098)、效率(0.133)、技术可得性(0.066)、微藻菌株灵活性(0.079)和生产时间(0.071)。在一个案例研究中,两两比较了七个选择的收获和七个标准进行了比较。可推荐的最佳微藻收获技术是絮凝沉降,重量为0.202。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selection of Microalgae Harvesting Technology for Bio-crude Oil Production
Energy consumption of fossil fuel which keeps increasing has led to the urgency of research and development on the field  of  renewable  energy  for  the  future. Microalgae are considered to be the most promising new source of biomass compared with first and second-generation feedstocks. A great challenge is a choice of an effective approach for microalgae harvesting. Additional challenges of microalgae harvesting come from the small size of microalgae cells (3-30µm) and the similarity of the density of the microalgae cells to the growth medium. This research is aimed to determine the appropriate microalgae harvesting technology for bio-crude oil production. Several potential microalgae harvesting technologies are centrifugation, filtration, inorganic flocculation, organic flocculation, bioflocculation, electrocoagulation, and flocculation-sedimentation. The  method  used  in  this  research  is Analytic  Hierarchy  Process  (AHP). The  results  indicate  that  the parameters  taken  into  consideration  are  energy need (0.339), cost (0.214), risk of contamination (0.098), efficiency (0.133), technology availability  (0.066),  microalgae strain flexibility (0.079),  and  production time (0.071). In a case study, the pairwise comparison of seven alternatives each for the harvesting and seven criteria are compared. The best alternative that can be recommended as a microalgae harvesting technology is flocculation-sedimentation with a weight of 0.202.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信