无芯片RFID中极化对读取范围的影响

N. Barbot, E. Perret
{"title":"无芯片RFID中极化对读取范围的影响","authors":"N. Barbot, E. Perret","doi":"10.1109/RFID-TA53372.2021.9617398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a fair comparison between the read range of chipless RFID in co-polarization and cross-polarization in real environments. This comparison is a direct consequence of the bound on the read range for the chipless technology presented in [1]. The approach is based on an analytical model and validated by simulations and measurements. Results are mainly function of the considered residual environment. In static environments (such as anechoic chambers), co-polarization offers the highest read range due to the higher Radar Cross-Section (RCS) of the resonators with identical residual environments. However in dynamic environments (which include all real environments), cross-polarization is more robust since, even if resonators RCS is 6 dB lower than co-polarized tags, the associated residual environment is 10 dB lower. Thus read range in cross-polarization outperforms by a factor of 26% the one obtained in co-polarization in almost all real applications.","PeriodicalId":212607,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on RFID Technology and Applications (RFID-TA)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the Polarization over the Read Range in Chipless RFID\",\"authors\":\"N. Barbot, E. Perret\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RFID-TA53372.2021.9617398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a fair comparison between the read range of chipless RFID in co-polarization and cross-polarization in real environments. This comparison is a direct consequence of the bound on the read range for the chipless technology presented in [1]. The approach is based on an analytical model and validated by simulations and measurements. Results are mainly function of the considered residual environment. In static environments (such as anechoic chambers), co-polarization offers the highest read range due to the higher Radar Cross-Section (RCS) of the resonators with identical residual environments. However in dynamic environments (which include all real environments), cross-polarization is more robust since, even if resonators RCS is 6 dB lower than co-polarized tags, the associated residual environment is 10 dB lower. Thus read range in cross-polarization outperforms by a factor of 26% the one obtained in co-polarization in almost all real applications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on RFID Technology and Applications (RFID-TA)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on RFID Technology and Applications (RFID-TA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RFID-TA53372.2021.9617398\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on RFID Technology and Applications (RFID-TA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RFID-TA53372.2021.9617398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文对无芯片RFID在实际环境下的共极化和交叉极化的读取范围进行了比较。这种比较是[1]中提出的无芯片技术读取范围限制的直接结果。该方法基于分析模型,并通过仿真和测量验证。结果主要是考虑残留环境的函数。在静态环境(如暗室)中,由于具有相同残余环境的谐振器具有较高的雷达截面(RCS),因此共极化提供了最高的读取范围。然而,在动态环境(包括所有真实环境)中,交叉极化更具鲁棒性,因为即使谐振器的RCS比共极化标签低6 dB,相关的残余环境也低10 dB。因此,在几乎所有实际应用中,交叉极化的读取范围比共极化的读取范围要好26%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the Polarization over the Read Range in Chipless RFID
This paper presents a fair comparison between the read range of chipless RFID in co-polarization and cross-polarization in real environments. This comparison is a direct consequence of the bound on the read range for the chipless technology presented in [1]. The approach is based on an analytical model and validated by simulations and measurements. Results are mainly function of the considered residual environment. In static environments (such as anechoic chambers), co-polarization offers the highest read range due to the higher Radar Cross-Section (RCS) of the resonators with identical residual environments. However in dynamic environments (which include all real environments), cross-polarization is more robust since, even if resonators RCS is 6 dB lower than co-polarized tags, the associated residual environment is 10 dB lower. Thus read range in cross-polarization outperforms by a factor of 26% the one obtained in co-polarization in almost all real applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信