作为公共物品的财产安全:制度、社会政治环境和五个国家的实验行为

Francisco Campos-Ortiz, L. Putterman, T. Ahn, Loukas Balafoutas, Mongoljin Batsaikhan, Matthias Sutter, Chentong Xu, I. Chen, J. Tarrasó, M'exico City, Benjamin Furlan, In Innsbruck, M. Kang, Sangyeol Ahn, Namun Cho, I. Seoul, Amarsanaa Dashdavaa, D. Batjargal
{"title":"作为公共物品的财产安全:制度、社会政治环境和五个国家的实验行为","authors":"Francisco Campos-Ortiz, L. Putterman, T. Ahn, Loukas Balafoutas, Mongoljin Batsaikhan, Matthias Sutter, Chentong Xu, I. Chen, J. Tarrasó, M'exico City, Benjamin Furlan, In Innsbruck, M. Kang, Sangyeol Ahn, Namun Cho, I. Seoul, Amarsanaa Dashdavaa, D. Batjargal","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2172473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study experimentally the protection of property in five widely distinct countries— Austria, Mexico, Mongolia, South Korea and the United States. Our main results are that the security of property varies with experimental institutions, and that our subject pools exhibit significantly different behaviors that correlate with country-level property security, trust and quality of government. Subjects from countries with higher levels of trust or perceptions of safety are more prone to abstain initially from theft and devote more resources to production, and subjects from countries with higher quality political institutions are more supportive of protecting property through compulsory taxation. This highlights the relevance of socio-political factors in determining countries’ success in addressing collective action problems including safeguarding property rights.","PeriodicalId":113748,"journal":{"name":"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Security of Property as a Public Good: Institutions, Socio-Political Environment and Experimental Behavior in Five Countries\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Campos-Ortiz, L. Putterman, T. Ahn, Loukas Balafoutas, Mongoljin Batsaikhan, Matthias Sutter, Chentong Xu, I. Chen, J. Tarrasó, M'exico City, Benjamin Furlan, In Innsbruck, M. Kang, Sangyeol Ahn, Namun Cho, I. Seoul, Amarsanaa Dashdavaa, D. Batjargal\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2172473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study experimentally the protection of property in five widely distinct countries— Austria, Mexico, Mongolia, South Korea and the United States. Our main results are that the security of property varies with experimental institutions, and that our subject pools exhibit significantly different behaviors that correlate with country-level property security, trust and quality of government. Subjects from countries with higher levels of trust or perceptions of safety are more prone to abstain initially from theft and devote more resources to production, and subjects from countries with higher quality political institutions are more supportive of protecting property through compulsory taxation. This highlights the relevance of socio-political factors in determining countries’ success in addressing collective action problems including safeguarding property rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2172473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Economics: Publicly Provided Goods eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2172473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

摘要

我们对奥地利、墨西哥、蒙古、韩国和美国这五个截然不同的国家的财产保护进行了实验研究。我们的主要结果是,财产安全随实验机构的不同而不同,我们的受试者池在与国家一级的财产安全、信任和政府质量相关的行为上表现出显著不同。来自信任度或安全感较高的国家的被调查者最初更倾向于放弃盗窃行为,并将更多资源投入到生产中,而来自政治制度质量较高的国家的被调查者更支持通过强制征税来保护财产。这突出了社会政治因素在决定国家能否成功解决包括保护产权在内的集体行动问题方面的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Security of Property as a Public Good: Institutions, Socio-Political Environment and Experimental Behavior in Five Countries
We study experimentally the protection of property in five widely distinct countries— Austria, Mexico, Mongolia, South Korea and the United States. Our main results are that the security of property varies with experimental institutions, and that our subject pools exhibit significantly different behaviors that correlate with country-level property security, trust and quality of government. Subjects from countries with higher levels of trust or perceptions of safety are more prone to abstain initially from theft and devote more resources to production, and subjects from countries with higher quality political institutions are more supportive of protecting property through compulsory taxation. This highlights the relevance of socio-political factors in determining countries’ success in addressing collective action problems including safeguarding property rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信