RELAX和MODE在多径寻高中的性能比较

A. Laribi, Markus Hahn, J. Dickmann, C. Waldschmidt
{"title":"RELAX和MODE在多径寻高中的性能比较","authors":"A. Laribi, Markus Hahn, J. Dickmann, C. Waldschmidt","doi":"10.23919/IRS.2017.8008122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To measure the height of extended targets using radar wave multipath propagation, the line-of-sight (LOS) and the longest non-line-of-sight (NLOS) echos from a coherent target must be resolved accurately. This paper compares the performance of the recursive Fourier algorithm RELAX and the Method of Direction Estimation (MODE) algorithm for the purpose of multipath height finding. The main comparison consists of determining how accurate can a target height be estimated based on the LOS and NLOS spectrum output of the RELAX and the MODE algorithm. A multipath propagation model is presented and a target height formula is derived based on Sensor-Target geometry. It is then shown from the derived height formula that the height estimation accuracy of the algorithm highly depends on the range resolution of the sensor. The RELAX and MODE algorithms are applied separately to real world data for multipath components resolving. The extracted frequency and amplitude parameters are then used to retrieve target heights. The estimated height results based on RELAX and MODE spectrum are then compared and discussed. The results show that under sufficient Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), MODE can achieve similar performance as RELAX using lower computation costs.","PeriodicalId":430241,"journal":{"name":"2017 18th International Radar Symposium (IRS)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A performance comparison of RELAX and MODE for multipath height finding\",\"authors\":\"A. Laribi, Markus Hahn, J. Dickmann, C. Waldschmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/IRS.2017.8008122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To measure the height of extended targets using radar wave multipath propagation, the line-of-sight (LOS) and the longest non-line-of-sight (NLOS) echos from a coherent target must be resolved accurately. This paper compares the performance of the recursive Fourier algorithm RELAX and the Method of Direction Estimation (MODE) algorithm for the purpose of multipath height finding. The main comparison consists of determining how accurate can a target height be estimated based on the LOS and NLOS spectrum output of the RELAX and the MODE algorithm. A multipath propagation model is presented and a target height formula is derived based on Sensor-Target geometry. It is then shown from the derived height formula that the height estimation accuracy of the algorithm highly depends on the range resolution of the sensor. The RELAX and MODE algorithms are applied separately to real world data for multipath components resolving. The extracted frequency and amplitude parameters are then used to retrieve target heights. The estimated height results based on RELAX and MODE spectrum are then compared and discussed. The results show that under sufficient Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), MODE can achieve similar performance as RELAX using lower computation costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 18th International Radar Symposium (IRS)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 18th International Radar Symposium (IRS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/IRS.2017.8008122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 18th International Radar Symposium (IRS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/IRS.2017.8008122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了利用雷达波多径传播测量扩展目标高度,必须对相干目标的视距回波和最长非视距回波进行精确分辨。本文比较了用于多径寻高的递推傅立叶算法RELAX和方向估计方法(MODE)算法的性能。主要的比较包括确定基于RELAX和MODE算法的LOS和NLOS频谱输出来估计目标高度的精度。提出了一种基于传感器-目标几何的多径传播模型,并推导了目标高度公式。由推导出的高度公式可知,该算法的高度估计精度高度依赖于传感器的距离分辨率。RELAX和MODE算法分别应用于多路径组件解析的真实世界数据。然后使用提取的频率和幅度参数来检索目标高度。然后对基于RELAX和MODE谱的高度估计结果进行了比较和讨论。结果表明,在足够的信噪比(SNR)下,MODE可以获得与RELAX相似的性能,且计算成本更低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A performance comparison of RELAX and MODE for multipath height finding
To measure the height of extended targets using radar wave multipath propagation, the line-of-sight (LOS) and the longest non-line-of-sight (NLOS) echos from a coherent target must be resolved accurately. This paper compares the performance of the recursive Fourier algorithm RELAX and the Method of Direction Estimation (MODE) algorithm for the purpose of multipath height finding. The main comparison consists of determining how accurate can a target height be estimated based on the LOS and NLOS spectrum output of the RELAX and the MODE algorithm. A multipath propagation model is presented and a target height formula is derived based on Sensor-Target geometry. It is then shown from the derived height formula that the height estimation accuracy of the algorithm highly depends on the range resolution of the sensor. The RELAX and MODE algorithms are applied separately to real world data for multipath components resolving. The extracted frequency and amplitude parameters are then used to retrieve target heights. The estimated height results based on RELAX and MODE spectrum are then compared and discussed. The results show that under sufficient Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR), MODE can achieve similar performance as RELAX using lower computation costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信