农村配电系统的成本分析

E. Hreinsson
{"title":"农村配电系统的成本分析","authors":"E. Hreinsson","doi":"10.1109/UPEC.2006.367767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An activity based distribution cost model, APOWER, is applied to a rural distribution system, where multiple classes or bilateral contracts of energy are assumed. In particular, primary and secondary energy classes are considered where these classes share both system costs and benefits. Also, the cost of losses is shared by explicitly treating power and energy losses in the model. Different approaches to sharing other cost factors are suggested. The model is tested on an actual rural distribution network in Iceland and delivery and distribution costs are compared, with respect to rural and community delivery, voltage levels and bilateral contracts. Results can form a basis for designing transmission and distribution tariffs for network companies and can help shape the regulating environment for these companies by developing a unified framework in distribution system cost estimation","PeriodicalId":184186,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st International Universities Power Engineering Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost Analysis in a Rural Power Distribution System\",\"authors\":\"E. Hreinsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/UPEC.2006.367767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An activity based distribution cost model, APOWER, is applied to a rural distribution system, where multiple classes or bilateral contracts of energy are assumed. In particular, primary and secondary energy classes are considered where these classes share both system costs and benefits. Also, the cost of losses is shared by explicitly treating power and energy losses in the model. Different approaches to sharing other cost factors are suggested. The model is tested on an actual rural distribution network in Iceland and delivery and distribution costs are compared, with respect to rural and community delivery, voltage levels and bilateral contracts. Results can form a basis for designing transmission and distribution tariffs for network companies and can help shape the regulating environment for these companies by developing a unified framework in distribution system cost estimation\",\"PeriodicalId\":184186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 41st International Universities Power Engineering Conference\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 41st International Universities Power Engineering Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2006.367767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st International Universities Power Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2006.367767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

一个基于活动的分配成本模型,power,应用于农村分配系统,其中假定了多个类别或双边能源合同。特别是,考虑一次和二次能源类别,这些类别共享系统成本和收益。此外,通过在模型中明确处理功率和能量损失来分担损失成本。提出了分担其他成本因素的不同方法。该模型在冰岛的一个实际农村配电网上进行了测试,并就农村和社区的交付、电压水平和双边合同进行了交付和分配成本的比较。研究结果可以为网络公司设计输电和配电费率提供基础,并可以通过制定配电系统成本估算的统一框架,帮助塑造这些公司的监管环境
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost Analysis in a Rural Power Distribution System
An activity based distribution cost model, APOWER, is applied to a rural distribution system, where multiple classes or bilateral contracts of energy are assumed. In particular, primary and secondary energy classes are considered where these classes share both system costs and benefits. Also, the cost of losses is shared by explicitly treating power and energy losses in the model. Different approaches to sharing other cost factors are suggested. The model is tested on an actual rural distribution network in Iceland and delivery and distribution costs are compared, with respect to rural and community delivery, voltage levels and bilateral contracts. Results can form a basis for designing transmission and distribution tariffs for network companies and can help shape the regulating environment for these companies by developing a unified framework in distribution system cost estimation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信