朱维纳利斯的第二部讽刺作品

Tom Sapsford
{"title":"朱维纳利斯的第二部讽刺作品","authors":"Tom Sapsford","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198854326.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Juvenal’s second satire provides the most detailed literary description of cinaedi in antiquity. This chapter uses the poem’s central image of a double contagion—the mange spread among a herd and the blight passed between fruits—to execute a double reading of Juvenal’s text. It first explores the cinaedus’ legibility as a pervert, a significance which has been particularly generative for scholars of the history of sexuality, by exploring how the satire’s exhortation to seek out secret cinaedi resonates with the production of knowledge termed “the epistemology of the closet” by Eve Sedgwick, and by asking to what extent cinaedi constituted a clandestine subculture in early imperial Rome. It then mines the text for performative cues to argue that echoes of various forms of kinaidic speech can be found throughout the satire. Such echoes affirm that the cinaedus’ occupational and ontological significances are ultimately enmeshed and inseparable—a feature most clearly evidenced by the status category of infamia, a limitation of rights applicable to cinaedi whether they performed onstage, undertook sex work, or, as Roman men, allowed themselves to be penetrated.","PeriodicalId":421917,"journal":{"name":"Performing the Kinaidos","volume":"353 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Juvenal’s Second Satire\",\"authors\":\"Tom Sapsford\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198854326.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Juvenal’s second satire provides the most detailed literary description of cinaedi in antiquity. This chapter uses the poem’s central image of a double contagion—the mange spread among a herd and the blight passed between fruits—to execute a double reading of Juvenal’s text. It first explores the cinaedus’ legibility as a pervert, a significance which has been particularly generative for scholars of the history of sexuality, by exploring how the satire’s exhortation to seek out secret cinaedi resonates with the production of knowledge termed “the epistemology of the closet” by Eve Sedgwick, and by asking to what extent cinaedi constituted a clandestine subculture in early imperial Rome. It then mines the text for performative cues to argue that echoes of various forms of kinaidic speech can be found throughout the satire. Such echoes affirm that the cinaedus’ occupational and ontological significances are ultimately enmeshed and inseparable—a feature most clearly evidenced by the status category of infamia, a limitation of rights applicable to cinaedi whether they performed onstage, undertook sex work, or, as Roman men, allowed themselves to be penetrated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":421917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Performing the Kinaidos\",\"volume\":\"353 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Performing the Kinaidos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198854326.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performing the Kinaidos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198854326.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

朱维纳利斯的第二部讽刺作品提供了对古代cinaedi最详细的文学描述。这一章使用了这首诗的中心意象,即双重传染——牛瘟在牛群中传播,枯萎病在水果之间传播——来对尤维纳利斯的文本进行双重解读。它首先探讨了cinaedus作为一个堕落者的易读性,这一意义对性学历史的学者来说尤其重要,通过探索讽刺作品中寻找秘密cinaedi的劝诫是如何与Eve Sedgwick称为“壁橱认识论”的知识产生共鸣的,并通过询问cinaedi在多大程度上构成了早期罗马帝国的秘密亚文化。然后,它挖掘文本的表演线索,论证各种形式的kinaidic语言的回声可以在整个讽刺中找到。这种呼应肯定了cinaedus的职业和本体论意义最终是交织在一起的,不可分割的——这一特征最清楚地证明了臭名昭著的地位类别,适用于cinaedi的权利限制,无论他们是在舞台上表演,从事性工作,还是像罗马男人一样,允许自己被插入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Juvenal’s Second Satire
Juvenal’s second satire provides the most detailed literary description of cinaedi in antiquity. This chapter uses the poem’s central image of a double contagion—the mange spread among a herd and the blight passed between fruits—to execute a double reading of Juvenal’s text. It first explores the cinaedus’ legibility as a pervert, a significance which has been particularly generative for scholars of the history of sexuality, by exploring how the satire’s exhortation to seek out secret cinaedi resonates with the production of knowledge termed “the epistemology of the closet” by Eve Sedgwick, and by asking to what extent cinaedi constituted a clandestine subculture in early imperial Rome. It then mines the text for performative cues to argue that echoes of various forms of kinaidic speech can be found throughout the satire. Such echoes affirm that the cinaedus’ occupational and ontological significances are ultimately enmeshed and inseparable—a feature most clearly evidenced by the status category of infamia, a limitation of rights applicable to cinaedi whether they performed onstage, undertook sex work, or, as Roman men, allowed themselves to be penetrated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信