芬兰分布式能源生产中当地废弃物利用的未来

M. Horttanainen, M. Luoranen, N. Eriksson
{"title":"芬兰分布式能源生产中当地废弃物利用的未来","authors":"M. Horttanainen, M. Luoranen, N. Eriksson","doi":"10.15626/eco-tech.2005.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A very small part of waste management has been carried out by incineration in Finland.About 300 kt of waste is incinerated or burned with other fuels. Waste materials have beenused in energy production mostly as co-combustion fuels at several energy production plants.The waste incineration directive of the European Union sets tight regulations for the emissionlimits, their measurements, as well as for temperature and residence time conditions in thefurnace. The costs of solid recovered fuel (SRF) utilization will increase remarkablyespecially in small heating plants because of these demands.In this study we focus on the preconditions for the utilization of local waste materials indistributed energy production. We introduce two different cases where a fuel produced fromlocal waste materials is used in small-scale energy production (<l 0 MW). The first caseincludes an existing 3.5 MW district heating boiler which has used SRF with biofuels forseveral years with good experiences and low emissions. The fraction of SRF is only about I 0% of the total fuel. The second case is based on package and construction waste collectedfrom the economic area of about 75 000 people. It was assumed that the technology of thenew heating plant would not have to differ a lot from the modem biofuel-using plant becauseof the good SRF quality. The amount of the waste-derived fuel is 10 000 Ua.In the first case the continuation of the energy use of waste would cause at least a 38 % rise tothe waste management fee. In the second case the investment and operation costs could becovered without a gate-fee if the owner of the plant (e.g. a sawmill) could save about 25€/MWh (approximate price of heat for customer) in the purchase costs of heat for their ownconsumption. If the plant could sell the heat to the district heating network with the price of15.5 €/MWh, the gate-fee would be about 38 €/t at the break-even point, which is the same asthe gate-fee of the energy waste at the moment.","PeriodicalId":321575,"journal":{"name":"Linnaeus Eco-Tech","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The future of local waste material utilization in distributed energy production in Finland\",\"authors\":\"M. Horttanainen, M. Luoranen, N. Eriksson\",\"doi\":\"10.15626/eco-tech.2005.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A very small part of waste management has been carried out by incineration in Finland.About 300 kt of waste is incinerated or burned with other fuels. Waste materials have beenused in energy production mostly as co-combustion fuels at several energy production plants.The waste incineration directive of the European Union sets tight regulations for the emissionlimits, their measurements, as well as for temperature and residence time conditions in thefurnace. The costs of solid recovered fuel (SRF) utilization will increase remarkablyespecially in small heating plants because of these demands.In this study we focus on the preconditions for the utilization of local waste materials indistributed energy production. We introduce two different cases where a fuel produced fromlocal waste materials is used in small-scale energy production (<l 0 MW). The first caseincludes an existing 3.5 MW district heating boiler which has used SRF with biofuels forseveral years with good experiences and low emissions. The fraction of SRF is only about I 0% of the total fuel. The second case is based on package and construction waste collectedfrom the economic area of about 75 000 people. It was assumed that the technology of thenew heating plant would not have to differ a lot from the modem biofuel-using plant becauseof the good SRF quality. The amount of the waste-derived fuel is 10 000 Ua.In the first case the continuation of the energy use of waste would cause at least a 38 % rise tothe waste management fee. In the second case the investment and operation costs could becovered without a gate-fee if the owner of the plant (e.g. a sawmill) could save about 25€/MWh (approximate price of heat for customer) in the purchase costs of heat for their ownconsumption. If the plant could sell the heat to the district heating network with the price of15.5 €/MWh, the gate-fee would be about 38 €/t at the break-even point, which is the same asthe gate-fee of the energy waste at the moment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":321575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linnaeus Eco-Tech\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linnaeus Eco-Tech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15626/eco-tech.2005.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linnaeus Eco-Tech","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15626/eco-tech.2005.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在芬兰,只有很小一部分废物管理是通过焚烧进行的。大约30万吨的废物被焚烧或与其他燃料一起燃烧。在一些能源生产工厂中,废物主要作为共燃燃料用于能源生产。欧盟的垃圾焚烧指令对排放限值、测量以及炉内温度和停留时间条件都制定了严格的规定。由于这些需求,固体回收燃料(SRF)利用的成本将显著增加,特别是在小型供热厂。在本研究中,我们重点研究了利用当地废弃物进行分布式能源生产的前提条件。我们介绍了两个不同的案例,其中一种由当地废料生产的燃料被用于小规模能源生产(< 1 0 MW)。第一个案例包括一个现有的3.5兆瓦区域供热锅炉,该锅炉多年来一直使用SRF和生物燃料,具有良好的经验和低排放。SRF的比例仅占总燃料的1%左右。第二个案例是基于从约75,000人的经济区域收集的包装和建筑垃圾。由于SRF质量好,我们认为新供热厂的技术与现代生物燃料厂不会有太大的差别。废物衍生燃料的量为10,000 Ua。在第一种情况下,继续利用废物的能源将导致废物管理费至少增加38%。在第二种情况下,如果工厂的所有者(例如锯木厂)可以节省大约25欧元/兆瓦时(为客户提供的大致热量价格)的购买热量成本,则可以在不收取门票费的情况下收回投资和运营成本。如果电厂能够以15.5€/MWh的价格将热量出售给区域供热网络,那么在盈亏平衡点的门费约为38€/t,这与目前能源浪费的门费相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The future of local waste material utilization in distributed energy production in Finland
A very small part of waste management has been carried out by incineration in Finland.About 300 kt of waste is incinerated or burned with other fuels. Waste materials have beenused in energy production mostly as co-combustion fuels at several energy production plants.The waste incineration directive of the European Union sets tight regulations for the emissionlimits, their measurements, as well as for temperature and residence time conditions in thefurnace. The costs of solid recovered fuel (SRF) utilization will increase remarkablyespecially in small heating plants because of these demands.In this study we focus on the preconditions for the utilization of local waste materials indistributed energy production. We introduce two different cases where a fuel produced fromlocal waste materials is used in small-scale energy production (
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信