探索高层管理团队与任务相关的断层线与高管傲慢之间的倒u型关系

Qing Xie, Wuwei Li, X. Lou
{"title":"探索高层管理团队与任务相关的断层线与高管傲慢之间的倒u型关系","authors":"Qing Xie, Wuwei Li, X. Lou","doi":"10.1108/lodj-01-2022-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeTop executive hubris is associated with positive/negative outcome. Little is known about the antecedent of hubris in top management team (TMT) and how they can be weakened to capitalize on TMT size and market complexity. This paper aims to address these issues.Design/methodology/approachThis study draws on the social information processing theory. Subsequently, it proposes and tests an inverted U-shaped relationship between task-related faultlines and top executive hubris. Top management team size and complexity can weaken the relationship between them. Panel data were collected longitudinally from 2011 to 2016 on China's listed firm on growth enterprises board.FindingsHierarchical regression analyses indicate that medium task-related faultlines experience stronger than weak and strong faultlines. TMT size and market complexity can weaken the inverted U-shaped relationship between them.Originality/valueThis study provides pioneering evidence for an inverted U-shaped relationship between task-related faultlines and top executive hubris. These findings inform practice by suggesting a tipping point of team faultlines.","PeriodicalId":132021,"journal":{"name":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring an inverted U-shaped relationship between top management team task-related faultlines and top executive hubris\",\"authors\":\"Qing Xie, Wuwei Li, X. Lou\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/lodj-01-2022-0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeTop executive hubris is associated with positive/negative outcome. Little is known about the antecedent of hubris in top management team (TMT) and how they can be weakened to capitalize on TMT size and market complexity. This paper aims to address these issues.Design/methodology/approachThis study draws on the social information processing theory. Subsequently, it proposes and tests an inverted U-shaped relationship between task-related faultlines and top executive hubris. Top management team size and complexity can weaken the relationship between them. Panel data were collected longitudinally from 2011 to 2016 on China's listed firm on growth enterprises board.FindingsHierarchical regression analyses indicate that medium task-related faultlines experience stronger than weak and strong faultlines. TMT size and market complexity can weaken the inverted U-shaped relationship between them.Originality/valueThis study provides pioneering evidence for an inverted U-shaped relationship between task-related faultlines and top executive hubris. These findings inform practice by suggesting a tipping point of team faultlines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leadership & Organization Development Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leadership & Organization Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-01-2022-0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-01-2022-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:高层管理者的傲慢与积极/消极的结果有关。人们对高层管理团队傲慢的成因知之甚少,也不知道如何削弱他们,以利用高层管理团队的规模和市场复杂性。本文旨在解决这些问题。设计/方法/途径本研究借鉴了社会信息加工理论。随后,它提出并检验了与任务相关的断层线与高管傲慢之间的倒u型关系。高层管理团队的规模和复杂性会削弱他们之间的关系。纵向收集2011 - 2016年中国创业板上市公司的面板数据。发现层次回归分析表明,中等任务相关断层线比弱断层线和强断层线经历更强。TMT规模和市场复杂性之间的倒u型关系可以被削弱。独创性/价值这项研究为任务相关断层线与高管傲慢之间的倒u型关系提供了开创性的证据。这些发现通过暗示团队断层的临界点来告知实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring an inverted U-shaped relationship between top management team task-related faultlines and top executive hubris
PurposeTop executive hubris is associated with positive/negative outcome. Little is known about the antecedent of hubris in top management team (TMT) and how they can be weakened to capitalize on TMT size and market complexity. This paper aims to address these issues.Design/methodology/approachThis study draws on the social information processing theory. Subsequently, it proposes and tests an inverted U-shaped relationship between task-related faultlines and top executive hubris. Top management team size and complexity can weaken the relationship between them. Panel data were collected longitudinally from 2011 to 2016 on China's listed firm on growth enterprises board.FindingsHierarchical regression analyses indicate that medium task-related faultlines experience stronger than weak and strong faultlines. TMT size and market complexity can weaken the inverted U-shaped relationship between them.Originality/valueThis study provides pioneering evidence for an inverted U-shaped relationship between task-related faultlines and top executive hubris. These findings inform practice by suggesting a tipping point of team faultlines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信