盲目的经济

R. Parsons
{"title":"盲目的经济","authors":"R. Parsons","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1875773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that the various theories of economics can all add value, yet educational institutions each seem overly committed to only one theory. The intense debates between economists are destructive and should be replaced with attempts to combine and use each of the theories in situations where they are most appropriate. This paper demonstrates an econometric approach that can verify that there is valuable information and relationships in each of the theories that if combined can improve overall understanding. This paper recommends that economics education investigate all the various theories and describes the specific situation for which each theory's assumptions best apply.","PeriodicalId":158767,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Other Social Sciences Education (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blind Economics\",\"authors\":\"R. Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1875773\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that the various theories of economics can all add value, yet educational institutions each seem overly committed to only one theory. The intense debates between economists are destructive and should be replaced with attempts to combine and use each of the theories in situations where they are most appropriate. This paper demonstrates an econometric approach that can verify that there is valuable information and relationships in each of the theories that if combined can improve overall understanding. This paper recommends that economics education investigate all the various theories and describes the specific situation for which each theory's assumptions best apply.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EduRN: Other Social Sciences Education (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EduRN: Other Social Sciences Education (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1875773\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Other Social Sciences Education (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1875773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文认为,各种各样的经济学理论都可以增加价值,但每个教育机构似乎都过于专注于一种理论。经济学家之间的激烈争论是破坏性的,应该被尝试在最合适的情况下结合和使用每一种理论所取代。本文展示了一种计量经济学方法,可以验证每个理论中都有有价值的信息和关系,如果结合起来可以提高整体理解。本文建议经济学教育研究所有不同的理论,并描述每种理论假设最适用的具体情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blind Economics
This paper argues that the various theories of economics can all add value, yet educational institutions each seem overly committed to only one theory. The intense debates between economists are destructive and should be replaced with attempts to combine and use each of the theories in situations where they are most appropriate. This paper demonstrates an econometric approach that can verify that there is valuable information and relationships in each of the theories that if combined can improve overall understanding. This paper recommends that economics education investigate all the various theories and describes the specific situation for which each theory's assumptions best apply.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信