致密砂土中预制混凝土桩的可钻性研究

P. Doherty, D. Igoe
{"title":"致密砂土中预制混凝土桩的可钻性研究","authors":"P. Doherty, D. Igoe","doi":"10.1179/dfi.2013.7.2.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A research study was recently completed by University College Dublin to examine the performance of various pile types including open steel tubular piles, concrete precast piles, and helical piers. At the outset of this project, one of the key risks identified was that the concrete piles could not be installed to the target depth due to (i) insufficient energy from the available hammer and (ii) the onset of pile material damage. In order to mitigate this risk a detailed pile driveability analysis was completed to predict the installation performance during driving. Selecting an appropriate model for predicting the Static Resistance to Driving (SRD) was seen as a critical component of the driveability process in order to predict reasonable stresses and blow counts. This paper describes the procedures adopted for a base case driveability analysis and the outcome of the pile installations. A comparison of the SRD using other models (including the API and IC-05 methods) was conducted and the results were compared to SRD profiles derived from dynamic pile monitoring conducted on one of the concrete piles. The base case driveability analysis indicated that the piles could be installed with the available hammer equipment, however it was noted that the driving stresses were relatively high and approached the failure stress of the concrete as the pile approached the target penetration. While hard driving was observed in the field, all of the piles reached their design depth of 7m (23 ft) with the exception of one pile which refused due to structural failure near the pile head. The driveability analysis and the measured stresses were interpreted to identify the cause of failure for the single pile, which was linked to the material properties of that specific pile.","PeriodicalId":272645,"journal":{"name":"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Driveability Study of Precast Concrete Piles in Dense Sand\",\"authors\":\"P. Doherty, D. Igoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/dfi.2013.7.2.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract A research study was recently completed by University College Dublin to examine the performance of various pile types including open steel tubular piles, concrete precast piles, and helical piers. At the outset of this project, one of the key risks identified was that the concrete piles could not be installed to the target depth due to (i) insufficient energy from the available hammer and (ii) the onset of pile material damage. In order to mitigate this risk a detailed pile driveability analysis was completed to predict the installation performance during driving. Selecting an appropriate model for predicting the Static Resistance to Driving (SRD) was seen as a critical component of the driveability process in order to predict reasonable stresses and blow counts. This paper describes the procedures adopted for a base case driveability analysis and the outcome of the pile installations. A comparison of the SRD using other models (including the API and IC-05 methods) was conducted and the results were compared to SRD profiles derived from dynamic pile monitoring conducted on one of the concrete piles. The base case driveability analysis indicated that the piles could be installed with the available hammer equipment, however it was noted that the driving stresses were relatively high and approached the failure stress of the concrete as the pile approached the target penetration. While hard driving was observed in the field, all of the piles reached their design depth of 7m (23 ft) with the exception of one pile which refused due to structural failure near the pile head. The driveability analysis and the measured stresses were interpreted to identify the cause of failure for the single pile, which was linked to the material properties of that specific pile.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/dfi.2013.7.2.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DFI Journal - The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/dfi.2013.7.2.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

都柏林大学最近完成了一项研究,研究了各种桩型的性能,包括开孔钢管桩、混凝土预铸桩和螺旋墩。在本项目开始时,确定的主要风险之一是由于(i)可用锤的能量不足和(ii)桩材料损坏的开始,混凝土桩无法安装到目标深度。为了降低这种风险,完成了详细的桩可打性分析,以预测在行驶过程中的安装性能。为了预测合理的应力和冲击次数,选择合适的模型来预测静阻力(SRD)被视为驾驶性过程的关键组成部分。本文介绍了基本情况下可驾驶性分析所采用的程序和桩安装的结果。对其他模型(包括API和IC-05方法)的SRD进行了比较,并将结果与其中一根混凝土桩的动态桩监测得到的SRD曲线进行了比较。基本情况下的可打性分析表明,现有的锤击设备可以安装桩,但需要注意的是,当桩接近目标穿透时,打入应力相对较高,接近混凝土的破坏应力。在现场观察到硬打桩时,除一桩因桩顶附近结构破坏而拒绝打桩外,所有桩均达到了7米(23英尺)的设计深度。对可驾驶性分析和实测应力进行解释,以确定单桩的破坏原因,这与特定桩的材料特性有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Driveability Study of Precast Concrete Piles in Dense Sand
Abstract A research study was recently completed by University College Dublin to examine the performance of various pile types including open steel tubular piles, concrete precast piles, and helical piers. At the outset of this project, one of the key risks identified was that the concrete piles could not be installed to the target depth due to (i) insufficient energy from the available hammer and (ii) the onset of pile material damage. In order to mitigate this risk a detailed pile driveability analysis was completed to predict the installation performance during driving. Selecting an appropriate model for predicting the Static Resistance to Driving (SRD) was seen as a critical component of the driveability process in order to predict reasonable stresses and blow counts. This paper describes the procedures adopted for a base case driveability analysis and the outcome of the pile installations. A comparison of the SRD using other models (including the API and IC-05 methods) was conducted and the results were compared to SRD profiles derived from dynamic pile monitoring conducted on one of the concrete piles. The base case driveability analysis indicated that the piles could be installed with the available hammer equipment, however it was noted that the driving stresses were relatively high and approached the failure stress of the concrete as the pile approached the target penetration. While hard driving was observed in the field, all of the piles reached their design depth of 7m (23 ft) with the exception of one pile which refused due to structural failure near the pile head. The driveability analysis and the measured stresses were interpreted to identify the cause of failure for the single pile, which was linked to the material properties of that specific pile.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信