病理学中的患者安全问题:从错误标记的标本到解释错误

D. Tang, Peter A. Dowbeus, M. Firstenberg, T. Papadimos
{"title":"病理学中的患者安全问题:从错误标记的标本到解释错误","authors":"D. Tang, Peter A. Dowbeus, M. Firstenberg, T. Papadimos","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Catastrophic breaches in patient safety often involve point-of-care settings such as the operating theater or intensive care unit, quite frequently without due consideration given to the elements leading up to such errors. Among such occurrences, wrong site procedures (WSPs) and diagnostic discrepancies continue to result in significant morbidity and mor tality among patients. Addressing adverse events is difficult for all stakeholders involved. Furthermore, clinician familiarity with the workflow specific to particular disciplines or procedures may be poor, amplifying communication lapses that precede patient safety occurrences. The patient care paradigm has become increasingly multidisciplinary, and it is important to discuss, improve, and be more cognizant of measures required to achieve “zero defect” performance. Despite the rarity of “never events,” their consequences may damage patient and community trust, provider morale, and institutional reputation. This chapter aims to assess current preventive measures and risks in the context of errors involving surgical pathology in the setting of the operating theater utilizing the framework of clinical vignettes. The discussion below will further center on the practical and inter pretative errors that occur in the pathological workflow, and the potential for compound - ing of such errors in the operating theater. Definitions concerning WSP and diagnostic discrepancies will be outlined to characterize potential outcomes of communication errors.","PeriodicalId":222529,"journal":{"name":"Vignettes in Patient Safety - Volume 3","volume":"365 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Safety Issues in Pathology: From Mislabeled Specimens to Interpretation Errors\",\"authors\":\"D. Tang, Peter A. Dowbeus, M. Firstenberg, T. Papadimos\",\"doi\":\"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Catastrophic breaches in patient safety often involve point-of-care settings such as the operating theater or intensive care unit, quite frequently without due consideration given to the elements leading up to such errors. Among such occurrences, wrong site procedures (WSPs) and diagnostic discrepancies continue to result in significant morbidity and mor tality among patients. Addressing adverse events is difficult for all stakeholders involved. Furthermore, clinician familiarity with the workflow specific to particular disciplines or procedures may be poor, amplifying communication lapses that precede patient safety occurrences. The patient care paradigm has become increasingly multidisciplinary, and it is important to discuss, improve, and be more cognizant of measures required to achieve “zero defect” performance. Despite the rarity of “never events,” their consequences may damage patient and community trust, provider morale, and institutional reputation. This chapter aims to assess current preventive measures and risks in the context of errors involving surgical pathology in the setting of the operating theater utilizing the framework of clinical vignettes. The discussion below will further center on the practical and inter pretative errors that occur in the pathological workflow, and the potential for compound - ing of such errors in the operating theater. Definitions concerning WSP and diagnostic discrepancies will be outlined to characterize potential outcomes of communication errors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vignettes in Patient Safety - Volume 3\",\"volume\":\"365 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vignettes in Patient Safety - Volume 3\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79634\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vignettes in Patient Safety - Volume 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者安全的灾难性破坏通常涉及手术室或重症监护病房等护理点环境,往往没有适当考虑导致此类错误的因素。在这些事件中,错误的部位程序(WSPs)和诊断差异继续导致患者的显著发病率和死亡率。处理不良事件对所有相关利益相关者来说都是困难的。此外,临床医生对特定学科或程序的工作流程的熟悉程度可能较差,从而放大了在患者安全事件发生之前的沟通失误。患者护理范式已经变得越来越多学科,重要的是讨论,改进,并更加认识到实现“零缺陷”绩效所需的措施。尽管“从不发生的事件”很少见,但它们的后果可能会损害患者和社区的信任、提供者的士气和机构的声誉。本章的目的是评估当前的预防措施和风险,在涉及手术病理的背景下,在手术室的设置利用临床小插曲的框架。下面的讨论将进一步集中在病理工作流程中出现的实际错误和解释错误,以及在手术室中这些错误复合的可能性。将概述有关WSP和诊断差异的定义,以描述通信错误的潜在结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Safety Issues in Pathology: From Mislabeled Specimens to Interpretation Errors
Catastrophic breaches in patient safety often involve point-of-care settings such as the operating theater or intensive care unit, quite frequently without due consideration given to the elements leading up to such errors. Among such occurrences, wrong site procedures (WSPs) and diagnostic discrepancies continue to result in significant morbidity and mor tality among patients. Addressing adverse events is difficult for all stakeholders involved. Furthermore, clinician familiarity with the workflow specific to particular disciplines or procedures may be poor, amplifying communication lapses that precede patient safety occurrences. The patient care paradigm has become increasingly multidisciplinary, and it is important to discuss, improve, and be more cognizant of measures required to achieve “zero defect” performance. Despite the rarity of “never events,” their consequences may damage patient and community trust, provider morale, and institutional reputation. This chapter aims to assess current preventive measures and risks in the context of errors involving surgical pathology in the setting of the operating theater utilizing the framework of clinical vignettes. The discussion below will further center on the practical and inter pretative errors that occur in the pathological workflow, and the potential for compound - ing of such errors in the operating theater. Definitions concerning WSP and diagnostic discrepancies will be outlined to characterize potential outcomes of communication errors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信