参数时间自动机中不变量的表达能力

É. André, D. Lime, Mathias Ramparison
{"title":"参数时间自动机中不变量的表达能力","authors":"É. André, D. Lime, Mathias Ramparison","doi":"10.1109/ICECCS.2019.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The verification of systems combining hard timing constraints with concurrency is challenging. This challenge becomes even harder when some timing constants are missing or unknown. Parametric timed formalisms, such as parametric timed automata (PTAs), tackle the synthesis of such timing constants (seen as parameters) for which a property holds. Such formalisms are highly expressive, but also undecidable, and few decidable subclasses were proposed. We propose here a syntactic restriction on PTAs consisting in removing guards (constraints on transitions) to keep only invariants (constraints on locations). While this restriction preserves the expressiveness of PTAs (and therefore their undecidability), an additional restriction on the type of constraints allows to not only prove decidability, but also to perform the exact synthesis of parameter valuations satisfying reachability. This formalism, that seems trivial at first sight as it benefits from the decidability of the reachability problem with a better complexity than Timed Automata (TAs), suffers from the undecidability of the whole TCTL logic that TAs, on the contrary enjoy. We believe our formalism allows for an interesting trade-off between decidability and practical expressiveness and is therefore promising. We show its applicability in a small case study.","PeriodicalId":432828,"journal":{"name":"2019 24th International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS)","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Expressive Power of Invariants in Parametric Timed Automata\",\"authors\":\"É. André, D. Lime, Mathias Ramparison\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICECCS.2019.00017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The verification of systems combining hard timing constraints with concurrency is challenging. This challenge becomes even harder when some timing constants are missing or unknown. Parametric timed formalisms, such as parametric timed automata (PTAs), tackle the synthesis of such timing constants (seen as parameters) for which a property holds. Such formalisms are highly expressive, but also undecidable, and few decidable subclasses were proposed. We propose here a syntactic restriction on PTAs consisting in removing guards (constraints on transitions) to keep only invariants (constraints on locations). While this restriction preserves the expressiveness of PTAs (and therefore their undecidability), an additional restriction on the type of constraints allows to not only prove decidability, but also to perform the exact synthesis of parameter valuations satisfying reachability. This formalism, that seems trivial at first sight as it benefits from the decidability of the reachability problem with a better complexity than Timed Automata (TAs), suffers from the undecidability of the whole TCTL logic that TAs, on the contrary enjoy. We believe our formalism allows for an interesting trade-off between decidability and practical expressiveness and is therefore promising. We show its applicability in a small case study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 24th International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS)\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 24th International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCS.2019.00017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 24th International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems (ICECCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCS.2019.00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将硬时序约束与并发性相结合的系统的验证是具有挑战性的。当某些时间常数缺失或未知时,这一挑战变得更加困难。参数时间形式,如参数时间自动机(pta),处理这样的时间常数(被视为参数)的合成,为一个性质持有。这种形式具有很强的表达能力,但也具有不可判定性,并且很少提出可判定的子类。我们在这里提出对pta的语法限制,包括删除保护(对转换的约束)以只保留不变量(对位置的约束)。虽然此限制保留了pta的表达性(因此保留了它们的不可判定性),但对约束类型的附加限制不仅允许证明可判定性,而且还允许执行满足可达性的参数估值的精确综合。这种形式主义乍一看似乎微不足道,因为它受益于可达性问题的可判定性,具有比时间自动机(TAs)更好的复杂性,但却受到整个TCTL逻辑的不可判定性的影响,而TAs恰恰相反。我们相信我们的形式主义允许在可决定性和实际表现力之间进行有趣的权衡,因此是有希望的。我们在一个小案例研究中展示了它的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Expressive Power of Invariants in Parametric Timed Automata
The verification of systems combining hard timing constraints with concurrency is challenging. This challenge becomes even harder when some timing constants are missing or unknown. Parametric timed formalisms, such as parametric timed automata (PTAs), tackle the synthesis of such timing constants (seen as parameters) for which a property holds. Such formalisms are highly expressive, but also undecidable, and few decidable subclasses were proposed. We propose here a syntactic restriction on PTAs consisting in removing guards (constraints on transitions) to keep only invariants (constraints on locations). While this restriction preserves the expressiveness of PTAs (and therefore their undecidability), an additional restriction on the type of constraints allows to not only prove decidability, but also to perform the exact synthesis of parameter valuations satisfying reachability. This formalism, that seems trivial at first sight as it benefits from the decidability of the reachability problem with a better complexity than Timed Automata (TAs), suffers from the undecidability of the whole TCTL logic that TAs, on the contrary enjoy. We believe our formalism allows for an interesting trade-off between decidability and practical expressiveness and is therefore promising. We show its applicability in a small case study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信